Paper · 1994 · Crop Science

Competition between Nitrogen Accumulation and Grain Growth for Carbohydrates during Grain Filling of Wheat

M. Bänziger; B. Feil; P. Stamp

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
54
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

It has been hypothesized that N accumulation and carbohydrate synthesis compete for energy and carbon skeletons during the reproductive growth phase of small grain cereals. This study was conducted to determine whether an increased N accumulation during grain rifling of wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) may reduce carbohydrate availability for grain formation. In a 2‐yr field experiment, four spring wheat genotypes, grown under three early N regimes, were supplied with 0, 50, and 100 kg N ha −1 at heading. The effect of late N application on photosynthesis rate (only in 1991), water soluble carbohydrates (WSC), grain growth and yield was recorded. N application at heading reduced WSC content of the shoot at anthesis by 8.5 g WSC per gram of accumulated N. During grain filling, a steady regeneration of WSC reserves in the stem occurred, though N accumulation was still enhanced by late application of N. By 320 degree days (d°) after anthesis, differences in stem WSC reserves between late N levels had disappeared. Measurements of photosynthesis rate and leaf area duration indicated that photosynthetic capacity of the canopy was increased by application of late N. Apart from the detrimental effect of late tillers which were induced by late N application, late N application generally resulted in higher grain yields. Since N compounds can be invested in light interception (photosynthesis rate, leaf area duration) before they are translocated to the grains, the consumption of energy and carbon skeletons for assimilating N cannot be considered alone as reducing carbohydrate availability for grain formation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen at heading reduced shoot WSC at anthesis by 8.5 g per gram accumulated nitrogen.

Organ / stage
at anthesise0
Treatment
N application at headinge0
Outcome
WSC content of the shoote0
Direction
reducede0
Value
8.5 g WSC per gram of accumulated Ne0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N application at heading reduced WSC content of the shoot at anthesis by 8.5 g WSC per gram of accumulated N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–761 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem WSC reserves regenerated steadily during grain filling.

Organ / stage
During grain fillinge0
Outcome
a steady regeneration of WSC reserves in the steme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During grain filling, a steady regeneration of WSC reserves in the stem occurred, though N accumulation was still enhanced by late application of N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–910 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late nitrogen enhanced nitrogen accumulation during grain filling.

Treatment
late application of Ne0
Outcome
N accumulatione0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During grain filling, a steady regeneration of WSC reserves in the stem occurred, though N accumulation was still enhanced by late application of N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–910 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Differences between late nitrogen levels in stem WSC disappeared by 320 degree days after anthesis.

Outcome
differences in stem WSC reservese0
Direction
disappearede0
Qualifier
320 degree days (d°) after anthesise0
Comparator
late N levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“By 320 degree days (d°) after anthesis, differences in stem WSC reserves between late N levels had disappeared.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1022 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late nitrogen increased canopy photosynthetic capacity.

Treatment
application of late Ne0
Outcome
photosynthetic capacity of the canopye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“photosynthetic capacity of the canopy was increased by application of late N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1173 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late nitrogen induced detrimental late tillers.

Treatment
late N applicatione0
Outcome
late tillerse0
Direction
inducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“detrimental effect of late tillers which were induced by late N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1265 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late nitrogen generally increased grain yields.

Treatment
late N applicatione0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“late N application generally resulted in higher grain yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1327 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–106 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors concluded nitrogen assimilation alone does not reduce carbohydrate availability for grain formation.

Outcome
carbohydrate availability for grain formatione0
Qualifier
the consumption of energy and carbon skeletons for assimilating Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the consumption of energy and carbon skeletons for assimilating N cannot be considered alone as reducing carbohydrate availability for grain formation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1471–1621 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–106 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 28 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

479 papers: 410 positive, 69 negative or no effect

409 papers in the same direction as this paper · 64 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

475 papers more in this group

See all 479 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.