Paper · 2007 · Animal Science Journal

Comparative study on yield and chemical composition of maize (Zea mays L.) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor Moench) using different levels of manure application

Ahmad Darobin LUBIS; Hajime KUMAGAI

14
claims
16
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT The effects of three levels of manure application (0, 4 and 8 ton/10 a) with basic fertilizer (N : P : K = 10:10:10 kg/10 a) on the yield and chemical composition of maize (Pioneer 32K61) and sorghum (FS501) forages were examined in 2 successive years, 2001–2002. Maize was harvested at yellow ripe stage, while sorghum at dough stage. Dry matter yield (DMY) of sorghum was significantly higher than that of maize in both 2001 and 2002. Although, DMY of both sorghum and maize were not significantly affected by manure levels in 2001, they increased with the level of manure in 2002. Maize had higher levels of crude protein (CP) and lower crude fiber concentration than those of sorghum in both 2001 and 2002. Manure application had no effect on chemical compositions of both maize and sorghum except for CP in both years and organic a fraction (Oa) concentration in 2002. The higher manure application might have greater effects on sorghum and maize production because of higher DMY in the second year without any increase in fiber fraction.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum dry matter yield exceeded maize in both years.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Outcome
Dry matter yield (DMY)e0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
both 2001 and 2002e0
Comparator
maizee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry matter yield (DMY) of sorghum was significantly higher than that of maize in both 2001 and 2002”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 345–444 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure level did not significantly affect sorghum dry matter yield in 2001.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
manure levelse0
Outcome
DMYe0
Direction
not significantly affectede0
Qualifier
2001e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DMY of both sorghum and maize were not significantly affected by manure levels in 2001”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–542 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure level did not significantly affect maize dry matter yield in 2001.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
manure levelse0
Outcome
DMYe0
Direction
not significantly affectede0
Qualifier
2001e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DMY of both sorghum and maize were not significantly affected by manure levels in 2001”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–542 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum dry matter yield increased with manure level in 2002.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Treatment
level of manuree0
Outcome
DMYe1
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
2002e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“they increased with the level of manure in 2002”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–591 · show in text ↑
e1

“DMY of both sorghum and maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–485 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize dry matter yield increased with manure level in 2002.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
level of manuree0
Outcome
DMYe1
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
2002e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“they increased with the level of manure in 2002”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–591 · show in text ↑
e1

“DMY of both sorghum and maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–485 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize crude protein was higher than sorghum in both years.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Outcome
crude protein (CP)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
sorghume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize had higher levels of crude protein (CP) and lower crude fiber concentration than those of sorghum in both 2001 and 2002”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–718 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize crude fiber was lower than sorghum in both years.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Outcome
crude fiber concentratione0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
sorghume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize had higher levels of crude protein (CP) and lower crude fiber concentration than those of sorghum in both 2001 and 2002”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–718 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure affected sorghum crude protein in both years.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
Manure applicatione0
Outcome
CPe0
Qualifier
both yearse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Manure application had no effect on chemical compositions of both maize and sorghum except for CP in both years and organic a fraction (Oa) concentration in 2002”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–881 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure affected maize crude protein in both years.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Manure applicatione0
Outcome
CPe0
Qualifier
both yearse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Manure application had no effect on chemical compositions of both maize and sorghum except for CP in both years and organic a fraction (Oa) concentration in 2002”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–881 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure affected sorghum organic a fraction in 2002.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
Manure applicatione0
Outcome
organic a fraction (Oa) concentratione0
Qualifier
2002e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Manure application had no effect on chemical compositions of both maize and sorghum except for CP in both years and organic a fraction (Oa) concentration in 2002”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–881 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure affected maize organic a fraction in 2002.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Manure applicatione0
Outcome
organic a fraction (Oa) concentratione0
Qualifier
2002e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Manure application had no effect on chemical compositions of both maize and sorghum except for CP in both years and organic a fraction (Oa) concentration in 2002”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–881 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other measured sorghum composition did not change with manure application.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
Manure applicatione0
Outcome
chemical compositionse0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Manure application had no effect on chemical compositions of both maize and sorghum except for CP in both years and organic a fraction (Oa) concentration in 2002”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–881 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other measured maize composition did not change with manure application.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Manure applicatione0
Outcome
chemical compositionse0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Manure application had no effect on chemical compositions of both maize and sorghum except for CP in both years and organic a fraction (Oa) concentration in 2002”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–881 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Higher manure application may improve forage production through higher second-year yield without increasing fiber.

Taxon
sorghum and maizeSorghumZea mayse0
Outcome
higher manure applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The higher manure application might have greater effects on sorghum and maize production because of higher DMY in the second year without any increase in fiber fraction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1051 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

446 papers: 418 positive, 28 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 418 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

442 papers more in this group

See all 446 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

422 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,485 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.