Paper · 1980 · Canadian Journal of Microbiology

The effect of rhizobiophages on populations of Rhizobium trifolii in the root zone of clover plants

Yvonne M. Barnet

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
28
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of rhizobiophages CT3 and CT4 on Rhizobium trifolii SU91 and SU36, respectively, was examined. These phage-susceptible strains were used, either singly or paired with a competing phage-resistant type as inoculum for Trifolium subterraneum plants growing in vitro in agar medium. Addition of bacteriophage to single strain experiments produced no significant effects on total bacterial numbers, nodulation, or plant dry weight. However, when phages were added to the paired inocula, significant decreases in counts of the susceptible strain were observed, frequently accompanied by a rise in numbers of the resistnt type. An increase in the proportion of ineffective variants of the susceptible rhizobia was also observed, although plant dry weights and nodule numbers were not altered. These effects were dependent only upon a difference in phage susceptibility of the bacteria and were obtained even when the competing strain was only partially resistant and a relativly poor competitor.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding phage to single-strain inocula did not significantly alter bacterial numbers, nodulation, or plant dry weight.

Taxon
Trifolium subterraneumTrifolium subterraneume1
Treatment
Addition of bacteriophagee0
Outcome
total bacterial numbers, nodulation, or plant dry weighte0
Direction
no significant effectse0

Not reportedInteractorComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium subterraneum
Trifolium subterraneum · TaxonKevin Thiele from Perth, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of bacteriophage to single strain experiments produced no significant effects on total bacterial numbers, nodulation, or plant dry weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–437 · show in text ↑
e1

“Trifolium subterraneum plants growing in vitro in agar medium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–289 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In paired inocula, phages significantly decreased susceptible rhizobial strain counts.

Taxon
Trifolium subterraneumTrifolium subterraneume1
Treatment
phages were added to the paired inoculae0
Outcome
counts of the susceptible straine0
Direction
decreasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium subterraneum
Trifolium subterraneum · TaxonKevin Thiele from Perth, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when phages were added to the paired inocula, significant decreases in counts of the susceptible strain were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–564 · show in text ↑
e1

“Trifolium subterraneum plants growing in vitro in agar medium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–289 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phage addition to paired inocula frequently increased numbers of the resistant type.

Taxon
Trifolium subterraneumTrifolium subterraneume2
Treatment
phages were added to the paired inoculae1
Outcome
numbers of the resistnt typee0
Direction
a risee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium subterraneum
Trifolium subterraneum · TaxonKevin Thiele from Perth, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“frequently accompanied by a rise in numbers of the resistnt type”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–630 · show in text ↑
e1

“when phages were added to the paired inocula”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–491 · show in text ↑
e2

“Trifolium subterraneum plants growing in vitro in agar medium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–289 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phage addition increased the proportion of ineffective susceptible rhizobial variants.

Taxon
Trifolium subterraneumTrifolium subterraneume1
Outcome
proportion of ineffective variants of the susceptible rhizobiae0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium subterraneum
Trifolium subterraneum · TaxonKevin Thiele from Perth, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An increase in the proportion of ineffective variants of the susceptible rhizobia was also observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–731 · show in text ↑
e1

“Trifolium subterraneum plants growing in vitro in agar medium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–289 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In paired inocula, plant dry weights and nodule numbers were unchanged despite shifts in rhizobial populations.

Taxon
Trifolium subterraneumTrifolium subterraneume1
Treatment
phages were added to the paired inoculae2
Outcome
plant dry weights and nodule numberse0
Direction
not alterede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium subterraneum
Trifolium subterraneum · TaxonKevin Thiele from Perth, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant dry weights and nodule numbers were not altered”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–795 · show in text ↑
e1

“Trifolium subterraneum plants growing in vitro in agar medium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–289 · show in text ↑
e2

“when phages were added to the paired inocula”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–491 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The population effects depended only on differences in bacterial phage susceptibility and occurred with a partially resistant poor competitor.

Taxon
Trifolium subterraneumTrifolium subterraneume1
Material
competing straine0
Outcome
These effectse0
Qualifier
partially resistant and a relativly poor competitore0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium subterraneum
Trifolium subterraneum · TaxonKevin Thiele from Perth, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These effects were dependent only upon a difference in phage susceptibility of the bacteria and were obtained even when the competing strain was only partially resistant and a relativly poor competitor.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–999 · show in text ↑
e1

“Trifolium subterraneum plants growing in vitro in agar medium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–289 · show in text ↑

inoculation · disease · Trifolium subterraneumPositive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Trifolium subterraneumPositive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.