Paper · 1978 · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research

The effects of copper and nitrogen supply on the retranslocation of copper in four cultivars of wheat

J Hill; AD Robson; JF Loneragan

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
58
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The retranslocation of copper and nitrogen was studied in four cultivars of wheat grown in pots of a copper-deficient sand from Lancelin, W.A. Plants were grown at two levels of nitrogen and three levels of copper, and harvested three times during growth and at maturity. Plants grown at low copper were severely copper-deficient and yielded no grain. At low nitrogen, plants at marginal copper gave similar grain yields to plants at high copper. Application of high nitrogen at marginal copper either had little effect or depressed grain yield. Application of high nitrogen at high copper gave a strong positive interaction producing maximal grain yield in each cultivar. Low copper supply delayed yellowing and the decline in copper and nitrogen content of the oldest leaf of each cultivar. Application of high nitrogen further delayed yellowing of the oldest leaf and loss of its copper and nitrogen. Probably the copper content of the oldest leaf does not decline until the leaf begins to senesce. Senesced leaves retain low concentrations of copper and nitrogen. It is suggested that at marginal copper, copper retention by senesced vegetation limits the retranslocation of copper from vegetation to grain. Susceptibility to copper deficiency differed markedly with stage of growth and with cultivar. At marginal copper and high nitrogen, copper deficiency almost eliminated the grain yield of Argentine IX, but had relatively small effects on Gamenya, Olympic, and Petit Rojo. The higher susceptibility of grain production in Argentine IX to copper deficiency was not related to its copper content in whole tops or to its grain protein concentration. The susceptibility may have resulted from the ability of this cultivar to form large numbers of tillers which competed with the developing grain for retranslocated copper.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low copper prevented grain yield.

Treatment
low coppere0
Outcome
yielded no graine0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plants grown at low copper were severely copper-deficient and yielded no grain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–351 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At low nitrogen, marginal and high copper gave similar grain yield.

Treatment
marginal coppere0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
similare0
Qualifier
low nitrogene0
Comparator
high coppere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“At low nitrogen, plants at marginal copper gave similar grain yields to plants at high copper.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–446 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High nitrogen at marginal copper had little or negative effect on grain yield.

Treatment
high nitrogen at marginal coppere0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
depressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of high nitrogen at marginal copper either had little effect or depressed grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–545 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High nitrogen and high copper produced maximal grain yield in each cultivar.

Treatment
high nitrogen at high coppere0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of high nitrogen at high copper gave a strong positive interaction producing maximal grain yield in each cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–672 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low copper delayed yellowing of the oldest leaf.

Organ / stage
oldest leafe0
Treatment
Low copper supplye0
Outcome
yellowinge0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“Low copper supply delayed yellowing and the decline in copper and nitrogen content of the oldest leaf of each cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–792 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low copper delayed the fall in leaf copper and nitrogen.

Organ / stage
oldest leafe0
Treatment
Low copper supplye0
Outcome
decline in copper and nitrogen contente0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“Low copper supply delayed yellowing and the decline in copper and nitrogen content of the oldest leaf of each cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–792 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High nitrogen further delayed yellowing and loss of copper and nitrogen in the oldest leaf.

Treatment
high nitrogene0
Outcome
yellowing of the oldest leaf and loss of its copper and nitrogene0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of high nitrogen further delayed yellowing of the oldest leaf and loss of its copper and nitrogen.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–903 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Senesced leaves retained low copper and nitrogen.

Organ / stage
Senesced leavese0
Outcome
low concentrations of copper and nitrogene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“Senesced leaves retain low concentrations of copper and nitrogen.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1067 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper deficiency susceptibility varied by growth stage and cultivar.

Organ / stage
stage of growthe0
Outcome
Susceptibility to copper deficiencye0
Direction
differed markedlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“Susceptibility to copper deficiency differed markedly with stage of growth and with cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1305 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At marginal copper and high nitrogen, copper deficiency almost eliminated Argentine IX grain yield.

Material
Argentine IXe0
Treatment
copper deficiencye0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
almost eliminatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“At marginal copper and high nitrogen, copper deficiency almost eliminated the grain yield of Argentine IX”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1411 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper deficiency had relatively small grain yield effects in Gamenya, Olympic, and Petit Rojo.

Material
Gamenya, Olympic, and Petit Rojoe0
Outcome
relatively small effectse0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“but had relatively small effects on Gamenya, Olympic, and Petit Rojo.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1482 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Argentine IX susceptibility was unrelated to copper content in whole tops.

Material
Argentine IXe0
Compound
copper contente0
Outcome
susceptibility of grain productione0
Direction
not relatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“The higher susceptibility of grain production in Argentine IX to copper deficiency was not related to its copper content in whole tops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1483–1617 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Senesced vegetation may retain copper that would otherwise be retranslocated to grain.

Outcome
retranslocation of copper from vegetation to graine0
Qualifier
copper retention by senesced vegetatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“It is suggested that at marginal copper, copper retention by senesced vegetation limits the retranslocation of copper from vegetation to grain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1211 · show in text ↑

copper atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

36 papers: 24 positive, 12 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

copper atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

75 papers: 63 positive, 12 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
    Copper deficiency decreased yield significantly.

    EFFECT OF COPPER DEFICIENCY ON PHENOLIC AND OTHER CONSTITUENTS OF · 1981

    Same directionCites this paperAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

copper atom · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 11 positive, 5 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

nitrogen · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

52 papers: 23 positive, 29 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.