Paper · 1992 · Journal of Experimental Botany

Effect of Water Stress on Photosynthesis, Leaf Characteristics and Productivity of Field-GrownNicotiana tabacumL. Genotypes Selected for Survival at Low CO2

E. DELGADO; M. A. J. PARRY; J. VADELL; et al.

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
18
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Dry mass production, leaf characteristics and diurnal photosynthesis of two N. tabacum L. genotypes selected for survival at low CO2 and the parent Wisconsin-38 (control plants) were measured on water-stressed and well-watered plants in the field. Differences in photosynthesis per unit leaf area were small and not significant between genotypes, but different patterns of photosynthesis were observed in stressed and non-stressed plants, with water stress reducing total net carbon fixation by 45% in all genotypes. More dry mass was produced by the selected genotypes than by Wisconsin-38 under irrigation. Production was smaller and the same for all three genotypes when stressed. The increased dry mass of the selected genotypes was related to greater total leaf area per plant which was accompanied by more cells per unit leaf area but smaller cell volume than in the control plants. The decrease in dry mass production under water stress was related to a decrease in total leaf area per plant and a decrease in cell number per unit leaf area; however, cell volume increased.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthesis per leaf area did not differ significantly between genotypes.

Taxon
N. tabacum L.e1
Outcome
photosynthesis per unit leaf areae0
Direction
smalle0
Comparator
genotypese0

Verbatim

e0

“Differences in photosynthesis per unit leaf area were small and not significant between genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–345 · show in text ↑
e1

“N. tabacum L. genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress reduced total net carbon fixation by 45% in all genotypes.

Taxon
N. tabacum L.e1
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
total net carbon fixatione0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
45%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“water stress reducing total net carbon fixation by 45% in all genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–515 · show in text ↑
e1

“N. tabacum L. genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–99 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selected genotypes produced more dry mass than Wisconsin-38 under irrigation.

Taxon
N. tabacum L.e1
Material
selected genotypese0
Outcome
dry masse0
Direction
Moree0
Qualifier
under irrigatione0
Comparator
Wisconsin-38e0

Verbatim

e0

“More dry mass was produced by the selected genotypes than by Wisconsin-38 under irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–607 · show in text ↑
e1

“N. tabacum L. genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under water stress, dry mass production was smaller and equal among the three genotypes.

Taxon
N. tabacum L.e1
Treatment
stressede0
Outcome
Productione0
Direction
smallere0
Comparator
all three genotypese0

Verbatim

e0

“Production was smaller and the same for all three genotypes when stressed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–682 · show in text ↑
e1

“N. tabacum L. genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–99 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The selected genotypes had greater total leaf area than controls.

Taxon
N. tabacum L.e1
Material
selected genotypese2
Outcome
total leaf area per plante0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
control plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“greater total leaf area per plant which was accompanied by more cells per unit leaf area but smaller cell volume than in the control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–887 · show in text ↑
e1

“N. tabacum L. genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–99 · show in text ↑
e2

“More dry mass was produced by the selected genotypes than by Wisconsin-38 under irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–607 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selected genotypes had more cells per unit leaf area than controls.

Taxon
N. tabacum L.e1
Outcome
cells per unit leaf areae0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
control plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“more cells per unit leaf area but smaller cell volume than in the control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–887 · show in text ↑
e1

“N. tabacum L. genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–99 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selected genotypes had smaller cell volume than controls.

Taxon
N. tabacum L.e1
Outcome
cell volumee0
Direction
smallere0
Comparator
control plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“smaller cell volume than in the control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–887 · show in text ↑
e1

“N. tabacum L. genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress decreased total leaf area per plant.

Taxon
N. tabacum L.e1
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
total leaf area per plante0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“under water stress was related to a decrease in total leaf area per plant and a decrease in cell number per unit leaf area; however, cell volume increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1079 · show in text ↑
e1

“N. tabacum L. genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress decreased cell number per unit leaf area.

Taxon
N. tabacum L.e1
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
cell number per unit leaf areae0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“under water stress was related to a decrease in total leaf area per plant and a decrease in cell number per unit leaf area; however, cell volume increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1079 · show in text ↑
e1

“N. tabacum L. genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress increased cell volume.

Taxon
N. tabacum L.e1
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
cell volumee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“under water stress was related to a decrease in total leaf area per plant and a decrease in cell number per unit leaf area; however, cell volume increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1079 · show in text ↑
e1

“N. tabacum L. genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–99 · show in text ↑

drought · molecular: metabolites · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 6 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

drought · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 16 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.