Paper · 2007 · International Journal of Vegetable Science

Yield of Crops in Within-Row Intercropped Okra-Cowpea or Okra-Cucumber

Mohamed Fouad Mohamed; Mohamed Hamam Dokashi; Magdy Ali Ahmed Mousa; et al.

9
claims
13
verbatim quotes
6
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Okra (Abelmoschus esculentusL.) cv. ‘Balady’, that is monocropped over 5-6 months in Upper Egypt usually grows slowly in the first 5-7 weeks. There is no information available on whether a secondary summer vegetable can be produced within main crop okra rows. In the present study, okra was planted on April 1,2004 and April 7,2005 at 40 cm within-row spaces on 70-cm wide rows. Cowpea or cucumber was planted at mid-distance between okra hills either simultaneously with okra (April 1, 2004 and April 7, 2005) or later after growing okra (April 27, 2004 and April 28, 2005). Sole crop treatments were also involved. Data indicated that okra-cowpea intercropping did not affect okra pod yield. Cowpea, on average, produced 257 kg·ha−1 dry seed yield when planted simultaneously or 3 weeks after planting okra. Calculated “aggressiveness” indicated that okra was the dominant crop. Land equivalent ratio (LER) of okra-cowpea intercropping was, on average, 1.2 for both years. With regard to cucumber, fruit yield was produced only when it was planted simultaneously with okra. Okra-cucumber intercropping based on simultaneous planting of both crops depressed okra pod yield to 90% of its monocropped yield. Intercropped cucumber yield as percent of sole culture was 60%. “Aggressiveness” showed that cucumber was the dominant crop. LER of okra-cucumber intercropping, on average, was 1.5 when both crops were simultaneously planted.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Okra-cowpea intercropping did not affect okra pod yield compared with sole crops.

Material
Baladye0
Treatment
okra-cowpea intercroppinge1
Outcome
okra pod yielde1
Direction
did not affecte1
Comparator
Sole crop treatmentse2
Setting
Upper Egypte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentusL.) cv. ‘Balady’, that is monocropped over 5-6 months in Upper Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–105 · show in text ↑
e1

“Data indicated that okra-cowpea intercropping did not affect okra pod yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–701 · show in text ↑
e2

“Sole crop treatments were also involved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–624 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea intercropped in okra rows produced 257 kg·ha−1 dry seed yield when planted simultaneously or 3 weeks after okra.

Treatment
planted simultaneously or 3 weeks after planting okrae2
Outcome
dry seed yielde2
Value
257 kg·ha−1e2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Cowpea, on average, produced 257 kg·ha−1 dry seed yield when planted simultaneously or 3 weeks after planting okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–817 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calculated aggressiveness indicated that okra was the dominant crop.

Outcome
aggressivenesse3
Qualifier
okra was the dominant crope3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentusL.) cv. ‘Balady’, that is monocropped over 5-6 months in Upper Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–105 · show in text ↑
e3

“Calculated “aggressiveness” indicated that okra was the dominant crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–888 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Okra-cowpea intercropping had a land equivalent ratio of 1.2 in both years.

Treatment
okra-cowpea intercroppinge4
Outcome
Land equivalent ratio (LER)e4
Value
1.2e4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentusL.) cv. ‘Balady’, that is monocropped over 5-6 months in Upper Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–105 · show in text ↑
e4

“Land equivalent ratio (LER) of okra-cowpea intercropping was, on average, 1.2 for both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–982 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Okra-cucumber intercropping with simultaneous planting depressed okra pod yield to 90% of its monocropped yield.

Treatment
Okra-cucumber intercropping based on simultaneous planting of both cropse5
Outcome
okra pod yielde5
Direction
depressede5
Value
90%e5
Comparator
its monocropped yielde5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Okra-cucumber intercropping based on simultaneous planting of both crops depressed okra pod yield to 90% of its monocropped yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1214 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropped cucumber yield was lower than sole culture, at 60% of sole-culture yield.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse6
Treatment
Intercroppede6
Outcome
cucumber yielde6
Direction
lowerinferrede6
Value
60%e6
Comparator
sole culturee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Intercropped cucumber yield as percent of sole culture was 60%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1278 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Okra-cucumber intercropping had a land equivalent ratio of 1.5 when both crops were planted simultaneously.

Treatment
okra-cucumber intercroppinge7
Outcome
LERe7
Value
1.5e7
Qualifier
when both crops were simultaneously plantede7

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“LER of okra-cucumber intercropping, on average, was 1.5 when both crops were simultaneously planted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1440 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cucumber was the dominant crop by calculated aggressiveness.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Outcome
Aggressivenesse1
Qualifier
cucumber was the dominant crope1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

““Aggressiveness” showed that cucumber was the dominant crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1339 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cucumber fruit yield was produced only when cucumber was planted simultaneously with okra.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Outcome
fruit yielde1
Qualifier
only when it was planted simultaneously with okrae1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“With regard to cucumber, fruit yield was produced only when it was planted simultaneously with okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1083 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

intercropping · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 25 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.