Paper · 2014 · Journal of Elementology

Efficiency of chelate forms of micronutrients in nutrition of greenhouse tomato grown in rockwool

Eugeniusz Kołota; Andrzej Komosa; Piotr Chohura

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Cultivation of vegetable crops on rockwool medium under controlled conditions requires the use of completely soluble forms of fertilizers for preparing nutrient solution. In order to prevent immobilization of metal microelements, especially Fe, they are often used in chelated forms. The low biodegradability of currently popular chelating agents may lead to contamination of the environment by these compounds. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether it is necessary to use chelated forms of Cu and Mn. Another objective was to assess the applicability of two chelating agents of iron in cultivation of tomato on rockwool slabs. Mineral forms of manganese (MnSO 4 H 2 O) and copper (CuSO 4 5H 2 O) were compared with EDTA+DTPA chelate forms of these nutrients. In the case of Fe, the suitability of EDTA and DTPA as the chelating agents was evaluated, taking into account the crop yield as well as nutritional status of tomatoes in different stages of growth. The results of our greenhouse trials proved that application of chelate forms of Cu and Mn did not alter the total yield of tomato fruits but accelerated fruit maturation, so that early tomato yield was higher than in response to mineral forms of these nutrients. Plants supplied with Cu and Mn chelates contained higher amounts of these nutrients in index parts of tomatoes analysed from May to August in one-month intervals. The use of DTPA and EDTA as chelating agents was just as productive in terms of tomato fruit yield. However, the DTPA chelate contributed to better plant nutrition with Fe, as well as Cu and Mn.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cu and Mn chelates did not change total tomato fruit yield.

Treatment
chelate forms of Cu and Mne0
Outcome
total yield of tomato fruitse0
Direction
did not altere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of chelate forms of Cu and Mn did not alter the total yield of tomato fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cu and Mn chelates accelerated tomato fruit maturation.

Treatment
chelate forms of Cu and Mne0
Outcome
fruit maturatione0
Direction
acceleratede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of chelate forms of Cu and Mn did not alter the total yield of tomato fruits but accelerated fruit maturation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cu and Mn chelates produced higher early tomato yield than mineral forms.

Outcome
early tomato yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
mineral forms of these nutrientse0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“early tomato yield was higher than in response to mineral forms of these nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1236 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants given Cu and Mn chelates contained higher Cu and Mn amounts.

Treatment
Cu and Mn chelatese0
Outcome
higher amounts of these nutrientse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants supplied with Cu and Mn chelates contained higher amounts of these nutrients in index parts of tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1348 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DTPA and EDTA were equally productive for tomato fruit yield.

Treatment
DTPAe0
Outcome
tomato fruit yielde0
Direction
just as productivee0
Comparator
EDTAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of DTPA and EDTA as chelating agents was just as productive in terms of tomato fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1499 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DTPA chelate improved Fe, Cu and Mn nutrition.

Treatment
DTPA chelatee0
Outcome
plant nutrition with Fe, as well as Cu and Mne0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the DTPA chelate contributed to better plant nutrition with Fe, as well as Cu and Mn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1594 · show in text ↑

copper atom · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

15 papers: 7 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

manganese atom · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

copper atom · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 2 positive, 8 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

manganese atom · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.