Paper · 1993 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Effect of ammonium chloride, ammonium sulphate, and sodium nitrate ontake‐alland grain yield of wheat grown on soils in South‐western Australia

R. F. Brennan

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Five field experiments are described which measured the effect of three sources of nitrogen (N) fertilizer, applied at 45 kg N/ha, on the incidence of take‐all and grain yield of wheat. The N fertilizers were ammonium sulphate, ammonium chloride, and sodium nitrate. Compared with the Nil N treatment, ammonium‐nitrogen fertilizer, either as ammonium sulphate (ASdr) or ammonium chloride (ACdr) drilled with the seed, lowered the severity of take‐all. Sodium nitrate topdressed (SNtd) to the soil surface reduced the severity of take‐all in three of five experiments, while ammonium sulphate topdressed (Astd) reduced the severity in four of the five experiments. Ammonium sulphate and ammonium chloride drilled with the seed were equally effective in reducing the severity of take‐all in three of the five experiments. However, ACdr was more effective than ASdr in reducing the severity of take‐all in one experiment whereas ASdr was more effective than ACdr in another experiment. In these two experiments (1 and 5), the effects of the reduction in take‐all severity between the ASdr and ACdr treatments did not affect grain yield. The results suggest that grain yield losses from take‐all are most severe where wheat plants are deficient in N. Chloride containing fertilizers are unlikely to control take‐all disease of wheat on soils of southwestern Australia.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed-drilled ammonium sulphate reduced take-all severity relative to nil nitrogen.

Treatment
ammonium sulphate (ASdr)e0
Outcome
severity of take‐alle0
Direction
lowerede0
Comparator
Nil N treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the Nil N treatment, ammonium‐nitrogen fertilizer, either as ammonium sulphate (ASdr) or ammonium chloride (ACdr) drilled with the seed, lowered the severity of take‐all”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–459 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed-drilled ammonium chloride reduced take-all severity relative to nil nitrogen.

Treatment
ammonium chloride (ACdr)e0
Outcome
severity of take‐alle0
Direction
lowerede0
Comparator
Nil N treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the Nil N treatment, ammonium‐nitrogen fertilizer, either as ammonium sulphate (ASdr) or ammonium chloride (ACdr) drilled with the seed, lowered the severity of take‐all”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–459 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Topdressed sodium nitrate reduced take-all severity in three of five experiments.

Treatment
Sodium nitrate topdressed (SNtd)e0
Outcome
severity of take‐alle0
Direction
reducede0
Value
three of five experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sodium nitrate topdressed (SNtd) to the soil surface reduced the severity of take‐all in three of five experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–575 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Topdressed ammonium sulphate reduced take-all severity in four of five experiments.

Treatment
ammonium sulphate topdressed (Astd)e0
Outcome
severitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
four of the five experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ammonium sulphate topdressed (Astd) reduced the severity in four of the five experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–671 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed-drilled ammonium sulphate and ammonium chloride were equally effective in three of five experiments.

Treatment
Ammonium sulphatee0
Outcome
severity of take‐alle0
Direction
equally effectivee0
Value
three of the five experimentse0
Comparator
ammonium chloridee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ammonium sulphate and ammonium chloride drilled with the seed were equally effective in reducing the severity of take‐all in three of the five experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–827 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium chloride was more effective than ammonium sulphate against take-all in one experiment.

Treatment
ACdre0
Outcome
severity of take‐alle0
Direction
more effectivee0
Value
one experimente0
Comparator
ASdre0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ACdr was more effective than ASdr in reducing the severity of take‐all in one experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–926 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium sulphate was more effective than ammonium chloride against take-all in another experiment.

Treatment
ASdre0
Outcome
more effectivee0
Direction
more effectivee0
Value
another experimente0
Comparator
ACdre0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ASdr was more effective than ACdr in another experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–990 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Differences in take-all severity between fertilizer treatments did not affect grain yield in experiments 1 and 5.

Treatment
ASdre0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
did not affecte0
Qualifier
experiments (1 and 5)e0
Comparator
ACdre0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In these two experiments (1 and 5), the effects of the reduction in take‐all severity between the ASdr and ACdr treatments did not affect grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1141 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield losses from take-all appear most severe in nitrogen-deficient wheat.

Compound
Ne0
Outcome
grain yield losses from take‐alle0
Direction
most severee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield losses from take‐all are most severe where wheat plants are deficient in N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1254 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Chloride-containing fertilizers are unlikely to control wheat take-all on southwestern Australian soils.

Treatment
Chloride containing fertilizerse0
Outcome
control take‐all diseasee0
Qualifier
unlikelye0
Setting
southwestern Australiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chloride containing fertilizers are unlikely to control take‐all disease of wheat on soils of southwestern Australia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1372 · show in text ↑

sodium nitrate · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

ammonium sulfate · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

107 papers: 72 positive, 35 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.