Paper · 2003 · Crop Science

Fusarium graminearum Infection during Wheat Seed Development and Its Effect on Seed Quality

Jason Argyris; David van Sanford; Dennis TeKrony

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
63
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Fusarium head blight (FHB) caused by Fusarium graminearum Schwabe causes losses in wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) seed quality and yield. Field studies were conducted in 2000 and 2001 to investigate F. graminearum seed infection (SI) and its relationship to seed germination and vigor and the production of the mycotoxin deoxynivalenol (DON). Seeds from four soft red winter wheat cultivars having different levels of Type II resistance to F. graminearum were harvested at frequent intervals during development and maturity. Low levels of SI occurred late in seed development in 2000, which resulted in high seed quality. In 2001, under heavy disease pressure, F. graminearum increased from <20% at 10 d after anthesis (DAA) to >98% at maturity in both resistant and susceptible cultivars, resulting in unacceptable standard germination (SG) (<80%) and seed vigor [<70% accelerated aging (AA) germination] early in seed development. Although fungicide seed treatment improved the SG of all cultivars, it still remained below acceptable commercial seed quality (80%). Deoxynivalenol was present at significant levels (5 to 25 mg kg −1 ) throughout seed development and maturation in all cultivars in 2001. Although the resistant cultivar P25R18 had reduced levels of DON and lower seed damage compared with susceptible P2552, resistance had no effect on SI and seed quality. Therefore, under severe disease pressure, Type II resistance offers little advantage to seed producers in reducing SI and improving seed quality during severe FHB epidemics.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low seed infection occurred late in 2000 development, with high seed quality.

Organ / stage
seed developmente0
Outcome
Low levels of SIe0
Qualifier
high seed qualitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Seed Development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“Low levels of SI occurred late in seed development in 2000, which resulted in high seed quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–620 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under heavy disease pressure in 2001, seed infection rose from below 20% at 10 days after anthesis to above 98% at maturity in resistant and susceptible cultivars.

Interactor
F. graminearumFusarium graminearume0pathogen
Outcome
F. graminearume0
Direction
increasede0
Value
>98%e0
Qualifier
from <20% at 10 d after anthesis (DAA)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Seed Development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“In 2001, under heavy disease pressure, F. graminearum increased from <20% at 10 d after anthesis (DAA) to >98% at maturity in both resistant and susceptible cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–787 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heavy disease pressure in 2001 produced standard germination below 80% early in seed development.

Organ / stage
seed developmente0
Outcome
standard germination (SG)e0
Value
<80%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Seed Development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“resulting in unacceptable standard germination (SG) (<80%) and seed vigor [<70% accelerated aging (AA) germination] early in seed development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–931 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heavy disease pressure in 2001 produced accelerated aging germination below 70% early in development.

Outcome
seed vigore0
Value
<70%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Seed Development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“seed vigor [<70% accelerated aging (AA) germination] early in seed development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–931 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide seed treatment improved standard germination in all cultivars, but it remained below 80%.

Treatment
fungicide seed treatmente0
Outcome
SGe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
80%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Seed Development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“Although fungicide seed treatment improved the SG of all cultivars, it still remained below acceptable commercial seed quality (80%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1065 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Deoxynivalenol was present at 5 to 25 mg kg −1 throughout seed development in all cultivars in 2001.

Organ / stage
seed development and maturatione0
Outcome
Deoxynivalenole0
Value
5 to 25 mg kg −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Seed Development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“Deoxynivalenol was present at significant levels (5 to 25 mg kg −1 ) throughout seed development and maturation in all cultivars in 2001.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1203 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistant P25R18 had reduced DON levels compared with susceptible P2552.

Material
P25R18e0
Outcome
levels of DONe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
P2552e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Seed Development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“resistant cultivar P25R18 had reduced levels of DON and lower seed damage compared with susceptible P2552”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1322 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistant P25R18 had lower seed damage than susceptible P2552.

Material
P25R18e0
Outcome
seed damagee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
P2552e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Seed Development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“resistant cultivar P25R18 had reduced levels of DON and lower seed damage compared with susceptible P2552”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1322 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Type II resistance had no effect on seed infection or seed quality.

Outcome
SI and seed qualitye0
Direction
no effecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Seed Development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“resistance had no effect on SI and seed quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1372 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that Type II resistance offers little benefit to seed producers during severe epidemics.

Outcome
little advantage to seed producers in reducing SI and improving seed qualitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Seed Development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“under severe disease pressure, Type II resistance offers little advantage to seed producers in reducing SI and improving seed quality during severe FHB epidemics.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1546 · show in text ↑

fungicide · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

53 papers: 42 positive, 11 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

293 papers: 259 positive, 34 negative or no effect

258 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

289 papers more in this group

See all 293 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.