Paper · 1993 · Crop Science

Responses of Recombinant Inbred Lines of Wheat to Saline Irrigations: Milling and Baking Qualities

Walter M. Kelman; Calvin O. Qualset

10
claims
10
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Disposal of salinized drainage water is a problem in the irrigated San Joaquin Valley of California and it has been proposed that this water could be used judiciously in the culture of wheat Triticum aestivum L.). This may require breeding of cultivars specifically for this cropping system and the effects of saline irrigation on end‐use quality may be affected. These considerations were addressed in a field study where salinity concentration of irrigation water was controlled and water uniformly applied over test plots. Two agronomically desirable cultivars, Anza and Cajeme 71, and 43 random recombinant inbred lines derived from their hybrid were studied for two successive years with two N fertilization levels and three salinity levels. Nitrogen effects were minimal in this study because of a high level of basal N in the experimental site. Wheat flour quality and baking performance were improved by saline irrigation in the first year, but in the second year, when grain filling was poor, quality was adversely affected by salinity. High‐molecular‐weight glutenin alleles from Cajeme 71 at the Glu‐l locus were associated additively with improved flour protein content ( Glu‐Al, Glu‐Dl ), breadloaf volume ( Glu‐Bl ), and SDS sedimentation ( Glu‐Dl ). There was little or no interaction of the Glu‐l alleles with salinity for flour protein content and mixing time. Only one epistatic interaction effect out of 80 tested was significant (α ABD for bake water absorption at high salinity in 1986). The additive effects were generally similar at the two salinity levels although interactions were detected which were less than 10% of the phcnorypic variance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen effects were minimal under high basal nitrogen.

Treatment
Nitrogene0
Outcome
effectse0
Direction
minimale0
Qualifier
high level of basal Ne0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen effects were minimal in this study because of a high level of basal N in the experimental site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–850 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saline irrigation improved flour quality and baking performance in year one.

Treatment
saline irrigatione0
Outcome
flour quality and baking performancee0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
first yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat flour quality and baking performance were improved by saline irrigation in the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–947 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity adversely affected quality in year two with poor grain filling.

Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
qualitye0
Direction
adversely affectede0
Qualifier
grain filling was poore0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“in the second year, when grain filling was poor, quality was adversely affected by salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1044 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cajeme 71 Glu‐Al and Glu‐Dl alleles associated additively with improved flour protein.

Material
Cajeme 71e0
Gene
Glu‐le0
Outcome
flour protein contente0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“High‐molecular‐weight glutenin alleles from Cajeme 71 at the Glu‐l locus were associated additively with improved flour protein content ( Glu‐Al, Glu‐Dl )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1200 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Cajeme 71 Glu‐Bl allele associated with improved breadloaf volume.

Gene
Glu‐Ble0
Outcome
breadloaf volumee0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“breadloaf volume ( Glu‐Bl )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1229 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Cajeme 71 Glu‐Dl allele associated with improved SDS sedimentation.

Gene
Glu‐Dle0
Outcome
SDS sedimentatione0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“SDS sedimentation ( Glu‐Dl )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1263 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glu‐l alleles had little or no salinity interaction for flour protein and mixing time.

Treatment
salinitye0
Gene
Glu‐le0
Outcome
flour protein content and mixing timee0
Direction
little or no interactione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“There was little or no interaction of the Glu‐l alleles with salinity for flour protein content and mixing time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1376 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

One of 80 epistatic tests was significant for bake water absorption at high salinity.

Gene
α ABDe0
Outcome
bake water absorptione0
Value
onee0
Qualifier
high salinity in 1986e0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Only one epistatic interaction effect out of 80 tested was significant (α ABD for bake water absorption at high salinity in 1986)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1507 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Additive effects were generally similar across two salinity levels.

Treatment
salinity levelse0
Outcome
additive effectse0
Direction
generally similare0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The additive effects were generally similar at the two salinity levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1509–1579 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Detected interactions accounted for less than 10% of phenotypic variance.

Outcome
phcnorypic variancee0
Value
less than 10%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“interactions were detected which were less than 10% of the phcnorypic variance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1589–1667 · show in text ↑

salinity · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

irrigation · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.