Paper · 2009

Differential Responses of Grain Yield and Quality to Salinity between Contrasting Winter Wheat Cultivars

Yanhai Zheng; Xianbin Xu; Zongfeng Li; et al.

15
claims
29
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An experiment was carried out to study the grain yields and quality criteria of contrasting wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars, DK961 (salt-tolerant) and JN17 (salt-sensitive) in response to a series of salinity levels (0, 50, 100, 150 mM). Salinity led to a reduction in grain yields of both cvs, however, DK961 was less affected than JN17. For grain quality, the 1000-seed weight of JN17 was rapidly reduced in saline conditions compared to the control, while it declined slightly in DK961. Grain protein content of DK961 increased by 0.2, 0.7 and 3.5%, respectively in 50, 100, 150 mM NaCl treatments compared to control. Those figures of JN17 reached 1.5, 5.3 and 9.9%. Flour yield of DK961 declined by 2.6, 3.7 and 3.9%, respectively in the above-mentioned salt treatments than control. The extent of reduction in flour yield was larger in JN17 than in DK961. Salinity induced positive effects on ash content and sedimentation volumes. The pasta quality parameters, e.g. wet gluten content, water absorbance, dough development time and dough stability time of DK961 displayed nonsignificant (P >0.05) changes under 50 and 100 mM NaCl concentrations against the control, while they declined considerably in the 150 mM NaCl treatment. However, pasta quality of JN17 declined significantly along with a reduction in grain yield under all levels of salt concentration. Our results suggested that wheat grain quality was closely associated with its growth under salinity stresses. Therefore, to obtain high grain yield and better quality of wheat in saline farmlands, only salt-tolerant wheat cultivars should be considered. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity reduced grain yield in both cultivars, less severely in DK961.

Material
DK961e0
Treatment
Salinitye0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
JN17e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity led to a reduction in grain yields of both cvs, however, DK961 was less affected than JN17.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–345 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity reduced JN17 thousand-seed weight rapidly relative to control.

Material
JN17e0
Treatment
saline conditionse0
Outcome
1000-seed weighte0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 1000-seed weight of JN17 was rapidly reduced in saline conditions compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–458 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity slightly reduced DK961 thousand-seed weight.

Material
DK961e0
Outcome
ite0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while it declined slightly in DK961.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–496 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DK961 grain protein rose 0.2% at 50 mM NaCl.

Material
DK961e0
Treatment
50e0
Outcome
Grain protein contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.2e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain protein content of DK961 increased by 0.2, 0.7 and 3.5%, respectively in 50, 100, 150 mM NaCl treatments compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–628 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DK961 grain protein rose 0.7% at 100 mM NaCl.

Material
DK961e0
Treatment
100e0
Outcome
Grain protein contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.7e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain protein content of DK961 increased by 0.2, 0.7 and 3.5%, respectively in 50, 100, 150 mM NaCl treatments compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–628 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DK961 grain protein rose 3.5% at 150 mM NaCl.

Material
DK961e0
Treatment
150 mM NaCle0
Outcome
Grain protein contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3.5%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain protein content of DK961 increased by 0.2, 0.7 and 3.5%, respectively in 50, 100, 150 mM NaCl treatments compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–628 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

JN17 grain protein increased by 1.5%, 5.3%, and 9.9% at the respective salinity levels.

Material
JN17e0
Outcome
figurese0
Value
1.5, 5.3 and 9.9%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Those figures of JN17 reached 1.5, 5.3 and 9.9%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–677 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DK961 flour yield fell 2.6%, 3.7%, and 3.9% at the respective salt treatments.

Material
DK961e0
Treatment
salt treatmentse0
Outcome
Flour yielde0
Direction
declinede0
Value
2.6, 3.7 and 3.9%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flour yield of DK961 declined by 2.6, 3.7 and 3.9%, respectively in the above-mentioned salt treatments than control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–795 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

JN17 flour yield declined more than DK961 flour yield.

Material
JN17e0
Outcome
flour yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
DK961e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The extent of reduction in flour yield was larger in JN17 than in DK961.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–868 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity raised ash content and sedimentation volumes.

Treatment
Salinitye0
Outcome
ash content and sedimentation volumese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity induced positive effects on ash content and sedimentation volumes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–944 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

DK961 pasta quality measures changed nonsignificantly at 50 and 100 mM NaCl.

Material
DK961e0
Treatment
50 and 100 mM NaCle0
Outcome
wet gluten content, water absorbance, dough development time and dough stability timee0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wet gluten content, water absorbance, dough development time and dough stability time of DK961 displayed nonsignificant (P >0.05) changes under 50 and 100 mM NaCl concentrations against the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1177 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DK961 pasta quality measures declined considerably at 150 mM NaCl.

Treatment
150 mM NaCle0
Outcome
theye0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while they declined considerably in the 150 mM NaCl treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1241 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

JN17 pasta quality fell significantly at every tested salinity level.

Material
JN17e0
Treatment
all levels of salt concentratione0
Outcome
pasta qualitye0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pasta quality of JN17 declined significantly along with a reduction in grain yield under all levels of salt concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1373 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

JN17 grain yield declined with salinity.

Material
JN17e0
Treatment
all levels of salt concentratione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pasta quality of JN17 declined significantly along with a reduction in grain yield under all levels of salt concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1373 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend salt-tolerant cultivars for saline farmland.

Outcome
salt-tolerant wheat cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only salt-tolerant wheat cultivars should be considered.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1628 · show in text ↑

salinity · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

salinity · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

salinity · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

227 papers: 30 positive, 197 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

223 papers more in this group

See all 227 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.