Paper · 1957 · Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science

Studies on the delaying of chrysanthemum flower by the spray of the growth substances. (III)

Y. TSUKAMOTO

16
claims
45
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In the previous papers the auther reported that growth substances may be successfully used for delaying flowering of chrysanthemum. The present study deals with the effects of combined applica-tion of electric light and auxin on delaying flowering and on flower characters. In the light culture of chrysanthemum, the light effect for delaying flowering decreases with an increase in distance from the light source due to the reduction in light intensity. If the auxin supply complements the deficiency of light intensity, then its application would be an advantageous method to save the cost of electric equipment. The variety “December King”, which is popularly cultivated by delaying its flowering for winter sale in Japan was used in this study. “Yellow Boyce”, which is a mid-season autumn variety and is not suitable for delaying was added for compari-son with “December King”. The materials were propagated by cuttings on July 11, planted in 6 inch pots on Aug. 4, and pinched on Aug. 14. Three shoots were selected for every plant. Total materials were divided into three lots each containing 13 pots. In each lot, pots were arranged in a row which extended from under the lamp to 3.2 meters away, and were labelled with no. 1, 2, 3, ……13. These pots were placed in the green-house which was heated with an electric cable after early January. The intensity of illumination from the 80 W Mazda lamp decreased from 60 lux nearest for the lamp to 2 lux at a distance 3.2 meters away. The first lot was applied with 50ppm of NAA, the second lot with 100ppm of NAA, and third lot was control. The auxin was supplied at every three day intervals. The long day (17 hrs.) and auxin treatments were started on Aug. 25 and ended on Oct. 10. At the termination of both treatments slight inhibition of growth of plants of “December King” was seen in the lot with 50ppm of NAA and heavy inhibition in the lot with 100ppm of NAA. However, with “Yellow Boyce” heavy inhibition seen in both of the treated lots. In this variety was the treated plants did not differentiate flower buds and showed the rosette habit after the termina-tion of treatments. Budding date, flowering date, . height of plant, number of leaves and flower size, , etc. were recorded. The experimental results on “December King” are summarized as follows: (1) The budding dates of control plants were delayed according to the position in relation to the light source. In the control, the budding date in the 10th pot was Oct. 12, while in the first pot which was placed nearest for the lamp, it was Nov. 16. With 50ppm of NAA the date of budding was delayed 17 days in the 13th pot, and 5 days in the first pot in comparison with the 13 th and the first pot of control respectively. However, they were delayed at the same rate in all plants applied with 100ppm of NAA. (2) The date of flowering in the treated plants were delayed according to the delay in bud-ding compared with control, however, those of the first pot treated with 50ppm of NAA and control were the same. (3) In the control and 50ppm of NAA lots, it was observed that the earlier the flowering date the shorter is the stem length. After the termina-tion of auxin spray all inhibited plants recovered their growing power and elongated. (4) There is no difference in number of florets among the flowers which opened before the last of December, but the flowers opened after late January had slightly fewer florets. (5) The differences in stem length, flower size, number of florets and number of leaves be-tween the treated lots and control were not' re-markable. From these results, it may be conclud-ed that, the application of auxin for delaying chry-santhemum flowering is practical. However, it is important to select a variaty which grows vigorously.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

50 ppm NAA delayed budding of chrysanthemum December King by 17 days in the 13th pot and 5 days in the first pot compared with control.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Material
December Kinge2
Treatment
50ppm of NAAe1
Outcome
date of buddinge1
Direction
delayede1
Value
17 dayse1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chrysanthemum flower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“With 50ppm of NAA the date of budding was delayed 17 days in the 13th pot, and 5 days in the first pot in comparison with the 13 th and the first pot of control respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2571–2744 · show in text ↑
e2

“The experimental results on “December King” are summarized as follows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2248–2317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100 ppm NAA delayed budding of chrysanthemum at the same rate in all plants compared with control.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
100ppm of NAAe2
Outcome
date of buddinge1
Direction
delayede2
Qualifier
at the same ratee2
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chrysanthemum flower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“With 50ppm of NAA the date of budding was delayed 17 days in the 13th pot, and 5 days in the first pot in comparison with the 13 th and the first pot of control respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2571–2744 · show in text ↑
e2

“they were delayed at the same rate in all plants applied with 100ppm of NAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2755–2830 · show in text ↑
e3

“The first lot was applied with 50ppm of NAA, the second lot with 100ppm of NAA, and third lot was control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1593 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The light effect for delaying chrysanthemum flowering decreases as distance from the light source increases, due to reduced light intensity.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
distance from the light sourcee1
Outcome
light effect for delaying floweringe1
Direction
decreasese1
Qualifier
due to the reduction in light intensitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chrysanthemum flower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“the light effect for delaying flowering decreases with an increase in distance from the light source due to the reduction in light intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–453 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

50 ppm NAA gave a slight inhibition of growth of December King chrysanthemum plants compared with control.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Material
December Kinge1
Treatment
50ppm of NAAe1
Outcome
growth of plantse1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1
Qualifier
slight inhibitione1
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chrysanthemum flower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“slight inhibition of growth of plants of “December King” was seen in the lot with 50ppm of NAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1776–1870 · show in text ↑
e2

“The first lot was applied with 50ppm of NAA, the second lot with 100ppm of NAA, and third lot was control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1593 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100 ppm NAA gave a heavy inhibition in the lot compared with control.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
100ppm of NAAe1
Outcome
heavy inhibitione1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chrysanthemum flower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“heavy inhibition in the lot with 100ppm of NAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1875–1921 · show in text ↑
e2

“The first lot was applied with 50ppm of NAA, the second lot with 100ppm of NAA, and third lot was control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1593 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Yellow Boyce chrysanthemum both NAA-treated lots showed heavy inhibition compared with control.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Material
Yellow Boycee1
Treatment
NAAe2
Outcome
heavy inhibitione1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chrysanthemum flower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“with “Yellow Boyce” heavy inhibition seen in both of the treated lots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1932–2001 · show in text ↑
e2

“The first lot was applied with 50ppm of NAA, the second lot with 100ppm of NAA, and third lot was control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1593 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Yellow Boyce chrysanthemum the NAA-treated plants did not differentiate flower buds and showed a rosette habit compared with control.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Material
Yellow Boycee1
Treatment
NAAe3
Outcome
differentiate flower budse2
Qualifier
showed the rosette habite2
Comparator
controle3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chrysanthemum flower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“with “Yellow Boyce” heavy inhibition seen in both of the treated lots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1932–2001 · show in text ↑
e2

“the treated plants did not differentiate flower buds and showed the rosette habit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2023–2104 · show in text ↑
e3

“The first lot was applied with 50ppm of NAA, the second lot with 100ppm of NAA, and third lot was control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1593 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In control plants the budding dates were later for pots farther from the light source, with the 10th pot budding on Oct. 12 and the first pot on Nov. 16.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
position in relation to the light sourcee1
Outcome
budding datese1
Direction
delayede1
Qualifier
the budding date in the 10th pot was Oct. 12e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chrysanthemum flower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“The budding dates of control plants were delayed according to the position in relation to the light source”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2323–2429 · show in text ↑
e2

“In the control, the budding date in the 10th pot was Oct. 12”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2431–2491 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Auxin-treated chrysanthemum plants had delayed flowering dates compared with control.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
auxine2
Outcome
date of floweringe1
Direction
delayede1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chrysanthemum flower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“The date of flowering in the treated plants were delayed according to the delay in bud-ding compared with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2836–2949 · show in text ↑
e2

“combined applica-tion of electric light and auxin on delaying flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–247 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The first-pot plants treated with 50 ppm NAA flowered on the same date as control.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
50ppm of NAAe2
Outcome
date of floweringe1
Direction
no_changeinferrede2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chrysanthemum flower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“The date of flowering in the treated plants were delayed according to the delay in bud-ding compared with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2836–2949 · show in text ↑
e2

“those of the first pot treated with 50ppm of NAA and control were the same”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2960–3034 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In control and 50 ppm NAA lots, earlier flowering was associated with shorter stems.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Organ / stage
steme1
Outcome
stem lengthe1
Direction
shortere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chrysanthemum flower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“it was observed that the earlier the flowering date the shorter is the stem length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3078–3160 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flowers opened before the last of December had no difference in number of florets.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Outcome
number of floretse1
Qualifier
flowers which opened before the last of Decembere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chrysanthemum flower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“There is no difference in number of florets among the flowers which opened before the last of December”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3270–3372 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flowers opened after late January had slightly fewer florets.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Outcome
floretse1
Direction
fewere1
Qualifier
opened after late Januarye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chrysanthemum flower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“the flowers opened after late January had slightly fewer florets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3378–3442 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Auxin treatment did not notably change stem length, flower size or number of florets compared with control.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
auxine2
Outcome
stem length, flower size, number of floretse1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chrysanthemum flower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“The differences in stem length, flower size, number of florets and number of leaves be-tween the treated lots and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3448–3569 · show in text ↑
e2

“combined applica-tion of electric light and auxin on delaying flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–247 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Auxin treatment did not notably change number of leaves compared with control.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
auxine2
Outcome
number of leavese1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chrysanthemum flower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“The differences in stem length, flower size, number of florets and number of leaves be-tween the treated lots and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3448–3569 · show in text ↑
e2

“combined applica-tion of electric light and auxin on delaying flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–247 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend auxin application for delaying chrysanthemum flowering as practical, and selecting a vigorous variety.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Outcome
delaying chry-santhemum floweringe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chrysanthemum flower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“the application of auxin for delaying chry-santhemum flowering is practical”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3640–3715 · show in text ↑

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

18 papers: 14 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · phenology · ChrysanthemumResults agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

class · growth · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

class · phenology · ChrysanthemumResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.