Abstract
1. Neither vitamin B1 nor naphthaleneacetic acid supplied to chrysanthemum plants in a concentration of 0.1 mg. per liter of complete nutrient solution produced any apparent growth responses or significant difference in dry weight. 2. Chrysanthemum plants receiving naphthaleneacetic acid in a concentration of 0.1 mg. per liter of minus K nutrient solution showed an increase in dry weight over the controls, indicating that the acid can compensate to some extent for the lack of potassium. 3. No significant difference in dry weight occurred between cosmos plants used as controls and those receiving 0.01 mg. of naphthaleneacetic acid, nicotinic acid, or nicotinic acid and vitamin B1 per liter of complete nutrient. 4. Marigold plants showed little variation in dry weight when supplied with nicotinic acid, or with a combination of nicotinic acid and vitamin B1. 5. A significant decrease in total dry weight of the marigold plants supplied with napthaleneacetic acid (0.01 mg. per liter) indicates a retarding effect of the acid on growth. 6. None of the treatments to which the cosmos and marigold plants were subjected resulted in visible effects upon their habit of growth or upon floral initiation.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Vitamin B1 caused no apparent growth or dry-weight difference in chrysanthemum.
- Taxon
- chrysanthemum
.jpeg?width=60)
Chrysanthemume0 - Treatment
- vitamin B1e0
- Outcome
- growth responses or significant difference in dry weighte0
- Direction
- Neithere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpeg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Neither vitamin B1 nor naphthaleneacetic acid supplied to chrysanthemum plants in a concentration of 0.1 mg. per liter of complete nutrient solution produced any apparent growth responses or significant difference in dry weight.”
Claim · model-written summary
Naphthaleneacetic acid caused no apparent growth or dry-weight difference in chrysanthemum in complete nutrient solution.
- Taxon
- chrysanthemumChrysanthemume0
- Treatment
- naphthaleneacetic acide0
- Outcome
- growth responses or significant difference in dry weighte0
- Direction
- Neithere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Neither vitamin B1 nor naphthaleneacetic acid supplied to chrysanthemum plants in a concentration of 0.1 mg. per liter of complete nutrient solution produced any apparent growth responses or significant difference in dry weight.”
Claim · model-written summary
Naphthaleneacetic acid in potassium-deficient solution increased chrysanthemum dry weight over controls.
- Taxon
- ChrysanthemumChrysanthemume0
- Treatment
- naphthaleneacetic acid in a concentration of 0.1 mg. per liter of minus K nutrient solutione0
- Outcome
- dry weighte0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- controlse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Chrysanthemum plants receiving naphthaleneacetic acid in a concentration of 0.1 mg. per liter of minus K nutrient solution showed an increase in dry weight over the controls”
Claim · model-written summary
Naphthaleneacetic acid partly compensated for potassium deficiency in chrysanthemum.
- Taxon
- ChrysanthemumChrysanthemume1
- Treatment
- naphthaleneacetic acide1
- Outcome
- compensate to some extent for the lack of potassiume0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“indicating that the acid can compensate to some extent for the lack of potassium.”
e1“Chrysanthemum plants receiving naphthaleneacetic acid”
Claim · model-written summary
Naphthaleneacetic acid did not significantly alter cosmos dry weight.
- Treatment
- 0.01 mg. of naphthaleneacetic acide0
- Outcome
- dry weighte0
- Direction
- No significant differencee0
- Comparator
- controlse0
CosmosOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“No significant difference in dry weight occurred between cosmos plants used as controls and those receiving 0.01 mg. of naphthaleneacetic acid, nicotinic acid, or nicotinic acid and vitamin B1 per liter of complete nutrient.”
Claim · model-written summary
Nicotinic acid did not significantly alter cosmos dry weight.
- Treatment
- nicotinic acide0
- Outcome
- dry weighte0
- Direction
- No significant differencee0
- Comparator
- controlse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“No significant difference in dry weight occurred between cosmos plants used as controls and those receiving 0.01 mg. of naphthaleneacetic acid, nicotinic acid, or nicotinic acid and vitamin B1 per liter of complete nutrient.”
Claim · model-written summary
Nicotinic acid with vitamin B1 did not significantly alter cosmos dry weight.
- Treatment
- nicotinic acid and vitamin B1e0
- Outcome
- dry weighte0
- Direction
- No significant differencee0
- Comparator
- controlse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“No significant difference in dry weight occurred between cosmos plants used as controls and those receiving 0.01 mg. of naphthaleneacetic acid, nicotinic acid, or nicotinic acid and vitamin B1 per liter of complete nutrient.”
Claim · model-written summary
Nicotinic acid produced little variation in marigold dry weight.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Marigold plants showed little variation in dry weight when supplied with nicotinic acid, or with a combination of nicotinic acid and vitamin B1.”
Claim · model-written summary
Nicotinic acid with vitamin B1 produced little variation in marigold dry weight.
- Taxon
- Marigolde0
- Treatment
- nicotinic acid and vitamin B1e0
- Outcome
- dry weighte0
- Direction
- little variatione0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Marigold plants showed little variation in dry weight when supplied with nicotinic acid, or with a combination of nicotinic acid and vitamin B1.”
Claim · model-written summary
Napthaleneacetic acid significantly decreased marigold total dry weight.
- Taxon
- marigolde0
- Treatment
- napthaleneacetic acid (0.01 mg. per liter)e0
- Outcome
- total dry weighte0
- Direction
- decreasee0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“A significant decrease in total dry weight of the marigold plants supplied with napthaleneacetic acid (0.01 mg. per liter)”
Claim · model-written summary
The cosmos treatments caused no visible growth habit or floral initiation effects.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“None of the treatments to which the cosmos and marigold plants were subjected resulted in visible effects upon their habit of growth or upon floral initiation.”
Claim · model-written summary
The marigold treatments caused no visible growth habit or floral initiation effects.
- Taxon
- marigolde0
- Treatment
- treatmentse0
- Outcome
- habit of growth or upon floral initiatione0
- Direction
- Nonee0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“None of the treatments to which the cosmos and marigold plants were subjected resulted in visible effects upon their habit of growth or upon floral initiation.”
The same questions in other papers
1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →fertilization · growth · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results
48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
48 papers more in this group
See all 52 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.