Paper · 2001 · Plant Production Science

Initiation and Development of Spikelets and Florets in Wheat as Influenced by Shading and Nitrogen Supply at the Spikelet Phase

Masanori Toyota; Ichiro Tsutsui; Akihito Kusutani; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
23
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

The spike of the main culm in winter wheat was examined by scanning electron microscopy from the double ridge to 6 days after the terminal spikelet stage to quantitatively evaluate the effects of shading and nitrogen supply at the spikelet phase on the numbers of spikelets and floret primordia, and the development of florets. Positional differences on a spike in grain setting at maturity were also investigated. Nitrogen supply affected neither the rate nor duration of spikelet initiation, the number of spikelets remaining unchanged. Although nitrogen supply positively affected the initiation and development of florets, it slightly reduced the grain weight per spike at maturity due to a decrease in the number of grains per spike and the reduced grain weight. These results suggested that under the field condition, nitrogen supply at the double ridge stage is too late to have a significant effect on the spikelet number, and might induce competition for nitrogen between the main culm and tillers, or induce mutual shading between plants, resulting in lighter grain weight per spike. Shading decreased the rate of spikelet initiation, resulting in a significant decrease in spikelet number. The initiation and the development of florets were also decreased by shading. Lower non -structural carbohydrate content at the terminal spikelet stage suggested that the limited assimilate supply by shading was likely responsible for the decreases in the initiation and development of spikelets and florets.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen supply did not change spikelet initiation rate or duration or spikelet number.

Treatment
Nitrogen supplye0
Outcome
rate nor duration of spikelet initiatione0
Direction
neithere0
Qualifier
number of spikelets remaining unchangede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen supply affected neither the rate nor duration of spikelet initiation, the number of spikelets remaining unchanged.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–538 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen supply promoted floret initiation and development.

Treatment
nitrogen supplye0
Outcome
initiation and development of floretse0
Direction
positively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen supply positively affected the initiation and development of florets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–625 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen supply slightly reduced grain weight per spike at maturity.

Organ / stage
at maturitye0
Treatment
Nitrogen supplyt0
Outcome
grain weight per spikee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it slightly reduced the grain weight per spike at maturity due to a decrease in the number of grains per spike and the reduced grain weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–766 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat as Influenced by Shading and Nitrogen Supply at the Spikelet Phase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen supply decreased grain number per spike.

Treatment
Nitrogen Supplyt0
Outcome
number of grains per spikee0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a decrease in the number of grains per spike”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–737 · show in text ↑
t0

“Initiation and Development of Spikelets and Florets in Wheat as Influenced by Shading and Nitrogen Supply at the Spikelet Phase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen supply reduced individual grain weight.

Treatment
Nitrogen Supplyt0
Outcome
grain weighte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the reduced grain weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–766 · show in text ↑
t0

“Initiation and Development of Spikelets and Florets in Wheat as Influenced by Shading and Nitrogen Supply at the Spikelet Phase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading decreased spikelet initiation rate.

Treatment
Shadinge0
Outcome
rate of spikelet initiatione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shading decreased the rate of spikelet initiation, resulting in a significant decrease in spikelet number.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1200 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading significantly decreased spikelet number.

Treatment
Shadinge0
Outcome
spikelet numbere0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shading decreased the rate of spikelet initiation, resulting in a significant decrease in spikelet number.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1200 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading decreased floret initiation and development.

Treatment
shadinge0
Outcome
initiation and the development of floretse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The initiation and the development of florets were also decreased by shading.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1278 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-structural carbohydrate content was lower at the terminal spikelet stage under shading.

Organ / stage
terminal spikelet stagee0
Treatment
shadinge0
Outcome
non -structural carbohydrate contente0
Direction
Lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lower non -structural carbohydrate content at the terminal spikelet stage suggested that the limited assimilate supply by shading was likely responsible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1431 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggested nitrogen at the double ridge stage is too late to materially change spikelet number under field conditions.

Treatment
nitrogen supply at the double ridge stagee0
Outcome
too late to have a significant effect on the spikelet numbere0
Setting
field conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under the field condition, nitrogen supply at the double ridge stage is too late to have a significant effect on the spikelet number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–929 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggested nitrogen competition or mutual shading may explain lighter grain weight per spike.

Treatment
Nitrogen Supplyt0
Outcome
lighter grain weight per spikee0
Qualifier
competition for nitrogen between the main culm and tillers, or induce mutual shading between plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“might induce competition for nitrogen between the main culm and tillers, or induce mutual shading between plants, resulting in lighter grain weight per spike”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1092 · show in text ↑
t0

“Initiation and Development of Spikelets and Florets in Wheat as Influenced by Shading and Nitrogen Supply at the Spikelet Phase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–127 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggested shading limited assimilate supply, reducing spikelet and floret initiation and development.

Treatment
shadinge0
Outcome
decreases in the initiation and development of spikelets and floretse0
Qualifier
limited assimilate supplye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the limited assimilate supply by shading was likely responsible for the decreases in the initiation and development of spikelets and florets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1508 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑

shade · quality: sugar starch · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 3 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

shade · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 6 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

551 papers: 426 positive, 125 negative or no effect

425 papers in the same direction as this paper · 116 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
    Reduced N supply reduced crop growth rate, through less intercepted radiation.

    The effects of radiation and nitrogen on number of grains in wheat · 1995

    Same directionCited by this paperAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  3. negative

547 papers more in this group

See all 551 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

323 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,737 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.