Paper · 1975 · Crop Science

Yield Potential in a Dwarf Spring Wheat and the Effect of Shading1

R. A. Fischer

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
190
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A dwarf spring wheat (Triticum aestivum ‘Yecora 70’) was grown under irrigation and optimal agronomy in northwest Mexico during four winter seasons. Single shading treatments of approximately four (1971, 1972), three (1973), and two (1974) weeks duration and various intensities were used to elucidate the importance for grain yield of radiation and crop photosynthesis at different stages of development. Shading always reduced crop growth, approximately in direct proportion to the reduction in radiation. Grain yield reduction was however curvilinearly related to radiation such that small reductions had little effect on yield at any developmental stage. Yield reductions with heavier shading only occurred with shading after about 60 days after seeding and were greater before anthesis (90 days) than after anthesis, especially in 1973. The shorter shading treatments indicated that the period of rapid spike growth, approximately 35 to 5 days before anthesis, was that showing greatest sensitivity to shading. Shading then led to fewer spikes/m 2 (lower tiller survival) and fewer grains/splkelet (fewer florets produced), hence reduced grains/m 2 Responses to post‐anthesis shading suggest that the degree of yield limitation by post‐anthesis photosynthesis is not constant for a given genotype, varying substantially from year to year. Thus in 1973 immediate pre‐anthesis conditions were unfavorable due to cloudiness, grains/m 2 was low, and yield was entirely limited by this factor. In other years, yield was more sensitive to post‐anthesis shading. However it is concluded that grains/m 2 , hence crop photosynthesis in the immediate pre‐anthesis period, is the key to higher yield in this cultivar.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading reduced crop growth in approximately direct proportion to the reduction in radiation.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivume0
Material
Yecora 70e0
Treatment
Shadinge1
Outcome
crop growthe1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
approximately in direct proportion to the reduction in radiatione1
Setting
northwest Mexicoe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A dwarf spring wheat (Triticum aestivum ‘Yecora 70’) was grown under irrigation and optimal agronomy in northwest Mexico during four winter seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–147 · show in text ↑
e1

“Shading always reduced crop growth, approximately in direct proportion to the reduction in radiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–506 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Small reductions in radiation had little effect on grain yield.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivume0
Material
Yecora 70e0
Treatment
radiatione2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2
Setting
northwest Mexicoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A dwarf spring wheat (Triticum aestivum ‘Yecora 70’) was grown under irrigation and optimal agronomy in northwest Mexico during four winter seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–147 · show in text ↑
e2

“Grain yield reduction was however curvilinearly related to radiation such that small reductions had little effect on yield at any developmental stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–657 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield reductions from heavier shading occurred only with shading after about 60 days after seeding and were greater before anthesis than after anthesis.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivume0
Material
Yecora 70e0
Treatment
heavier shadinge3
Outcome
Yield reductionse3
Direction
greatere3
Qualifier
only occurred with shading after about 60 days after seedinge3
Comparator
after anthesise3
Setting
northwest Mexicoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A dwarf spring wheat (Triticum aestivum ‘Yecora 70’) was grown under irrigation and optimal agronomy in northwest Mexico during four winter seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–147 · show in text ↑
e3

“Yield reductions with heavier shading only occurred with shading after about 60 days after seeding and were greater before anthesis (90 days) than after anthesis, especially in 1973”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–840 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The period of rapid spike growth, about 35 to 5 days before anthesis, was the most sensitive period to shading.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivume0
Material
Yecora 70e0
Organ / stage
rapid spike growthe4
Treatment
shorter shading treatmentse4
Outcome
sensitivity to shadinge4
Direction
greateste4
Qualifier
approximately 35 to 5 days before anthesise4
Setting
northwest Mexicoe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A dwarf spring wheat (Triticum aestivum ‘Yecora 70’) was grown under irrigation and optimal agronomy in northwest Mexico during four winter seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–147 · show in text ↑
e4

“The shorter shading treatments indicated that the period of rapid spike growth, approximately 35 to 5 days before anthesis, was that showing greatest sensitivity to shading”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–1014 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading led to fewer spikes per square metre due to lower tiller survival.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivume0
Material
Yecora 70e0
Treatment
Shadinge5
Outcome
spikes/m 2e5
Direction
fewere5
Setting
northwest Mexicoe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A dwarf spring wheat (Triticum aestivum ‘Yecora 70’) was grown under irrigation and optimal agronomy in northwest Mexico during four winter seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–147 · show in text ↑
e5

“Shading then led to fewer spikes/m 2 (lower tiller survival) and fewer grains/splkelet (fewer florets produced), hence reduced grains/m 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading led to fewer grains per spikelet.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivume0
Material
Yecora 70e0
Treatment
Shadinge5
Outcome
grains/splkelete5
Direction
fewere5
Setting
northwest Mexicoe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A dwarf spring wheat (Triticum aestivum ‘Yecora 70’) was grown under irrigation and optimal agronomy in northwest Mexico during four winter seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–147 · show in text ↑
e5

“Shading then led to fewer spikes/m 2 (lower tiller survival) and fewer grains/splkelet (fewer florets produced), hence reduced grains/m 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading reduced grains per square metre.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivume0
Material
Yecora 70e0
Treatment
Shadinge5
Outcome
grains/m 2e5
Direction
reducede5
Setting
northwest Mexicoe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A dwarf spring wheat (Triticum aestivum ‘Yecora 70’) was grown under irrigation and optimal agronomy in northwest Mexico during four winter seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–147 · show in text ↑
e5

“Shading then led to fewer spikes/m 2 (lower tiller survival) and fewer grains/splkelet (fewer florets produced), hence reduced grains/m 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1153 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The degree of yield limitation by post-anthesis photosynthesis was not constant for a given genotype and varied substantially from year to year.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivume0
Material
Yecora 70e0
Outcome
degree of yield limitatione6
Qualifier
not constant for a given genotype, varying substantially from year to yeare6
Setting
northwest Mexicoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A dwarf spring wheat (Triticum aestivum ‘Yecora 70’) was grown under irrigation and optimal agronomy in northwest Mexico during four winter seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–147 · show in text ↑
e6

“the degree of yield limitation by post‐anthesis photosynthesis is not constant for a given genotype, varying substantially from year to year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1342 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1973, grains per square metre were low under unfavourable cloudy pre-anthesis conditions and yield was entirely limited by this factor.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivume0
Material
Yecora 70e0
Outcome
grains/m 2 was lowe7
Qualifier
yield was entirely limited by this factore7
Setting
northwest Mexicoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A dwarf spring wheat (Triticum aestivum ‘Yecora 70’) was grown under irrigation and optimal agronomy in northwest Mexico during four winter seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–147 · show in text ↑
e7

“grains/m 2 was low, and yield was entirely limited by this factor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1427–1492 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield was more sensitive to post-anthesis shading in other years.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivume0
Material
Yecora 70e0
Treatment
shadinge6
Outcome
yielde6
Direction
more sensitivee6
Setting
northwest Mexicoe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A dwarf spring wheat (Triticum aestivum ‘Yecora 70’) was grown under irrigation and optimal agronomy in northwest Mexico during four winter seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–147 · show in text ↑
e6

“In other years, yield was more sensitive to post‐anthesis shading”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1494–1559 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Grains per square metre and crop photosynthesis in the immediate pre-anthesis period are the key to higher yield in this cultivar.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivume0
Material
Yecora 70e0
Outcome
higher yielde7
Qualifier
grains/m 2 , hence crop photosynthesis in the immediate pre‐anthesis periode7
Setting
northwest Mexicoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A dwarf spring wheat (Triticum aestivum ‘Yecora 70’) was grown under irrigation and optimal agronomy in northwest Mexico during four winter seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–147 · show in text ↑
e7

“it is concluded that grains/m 2 , hence crop photosynthesis in the immediate pre‐anthesis period, is the key to higher yield in this cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1569–1710 · show in text ↑

shade · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 6 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

shade · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 9 positive, 60 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.