Paper · 1981 · Agronomy Journal

Effect of Soil Fumigation on N2‐Fixation and Yield of Field Bean When Grown on Fusarium‐Infested Soils1

D. F. Bezdicek; G. T. Vigue; D. Burke

11
claims
26
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Nodulation in field beans ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is poor in root‐rot infested soils of the Columbia Basin of central Washington. Studies were initiated to determine if nodulation and N 2 ‐fixation rate were improved after fumigation and reduction in root rot. The effect of fumigation on nodulation and bean yield was studied in the field where N and three strains of Rhizobium phaseoli were applied to field beans grown in a Warden fine sandy loam soil (Xeroilic Camborthids) infested with root rot ( Fusarium solani f. sp. phaseoli ). Early nodulation with one strain but not yield, increased significantly with inoculation. Fumigation with 400 kg/ha of chloropicrin significantly increased shoot weight, root weight, and total N uptake throughout the season and decreased the incidence of root rot. Fumigation increased seed yields by an average of 1,800 kg/ha in 1975 and 900 kg/ha in 1976. In general, N(C 2 H 2 )‐fixation rate was not significantly increased by either inoculation or fumigation. Only after adding a high rate of inoculum to the fumigated plots was the N 2 (C 2 H 2 )‐fixation rate increased at one of four sampling dates. It would appear that the major increase in plant growth and seed yield following fumigation was due to a reduction in root rot rather than from an increase in nodulation or N 2 (C 2 H 2 )‐fixation rate. Nitrogen application of 112 kg/ha of N in 1975 and 135 kg/ha of N in 1976 did not increase yields in either fumigated or non‐fumigated soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

One Rhizobium strain significantly increased early nodulation.

Taxon
field beanst0
Treatment
inoculatione0
Interactor
Rhizobium phaseoliRhizobium phaseolit1symbiont
Outcome
Early nodulatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Early nodulation with one strain but not yield, increased significantly with inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–637 · show in text ↑
t0

“field beans ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–59 · show in text ↑
t1

“Rhizobium phaseoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–397 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation did not significantly raise yield.

Taxon
field beanst0
Treatment
inoculatione0
Interactor
Rhizobium phaseoliRhizobium phaseolit1symbiont
Outcome
yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Early nodulation with one strain but not yield, increased significantly with inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–637 · show in text ↑
t0

“field beans ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–59 · show in text ↑
t1

“Rhizobium phaseoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–397 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chloropicrin fumigation significantly increased shoot weight, root weight and nitrogen uptake.

Taxon
field beanst0
Treatment
Fumigation with 400 kg/ha of chloropicrine0
Outcome
shoot weight, root weight, and total N uptakee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Fumigation with 400 kg/ha of chloropicrin significantly increased shoot weight, root weight, and total N uptake throughout the season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–771 · show in text ↑
t0

“field beans ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chloropicrin fumigation decreased root rot incidence.

Taxon
field beanst0
Treatment
Fumigation with 400 kg/ha of chloropicrine0
Interactor
Fusarium solani f. sp. phaseoliFusarium phaseolit1pathogen
Outcome
incidence of root rote0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Fumigation with 400 kg/ha of chloropicrin significantly increased shoot weight, root weight, and total N uptake throughout the season and decreased the incidence of root rot.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–812 · show in text ↑
t0

“field beans ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–59 · show in text ↑
t1

“Fusarium solani f. sp. phaseoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–544 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fumigation increased seed yield by 1,800 kg/ha in 1975.

Taxon
field beanst0
Treatment
Fumigatione0
Outcome
seed yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1,800 kg/hae0
Qualifier
1975e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Fumigation increased seed yields by an average of 1,800 kg/ha in 1975 and 900 kg/ha in 1976.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–905 · show in text ↑
t0

“field beans ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fumigation increased seed yield by 900 kg/ha in 1976.

Taxon
field beanst0
Treatment
Fumigatione0
Outcome
seed yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
900 kg/hae0
Qualifier
1976e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Fumigation increased seed yields by an average of 1,800 kg/ha in 1975 and 900 kg/ha in 1976.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–905 · show in text ↑
t0

“field beans ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation generally did not significantly increase nitrogen fixation rate.

Taxon
field beanst0
Treatment
inoculatione0
Interactor
Rhizobium phaseoliRhizobium phaseolit1symbiont
Outcome
N(C 2 H 2 )‐fixation ratee0
Direction
not significantly increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In general, N(C 2 H 2 )‐fixation rate was not significantly increased by either inoculation or fumigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1012 · show in text ↑
t0

“field beans ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–59 · show in text ↑
t1

“Rhizobium phaseoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–397 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fumigation generally did not significantly increase nitrogen fixation rate.

Taxon
field beanst0
Treatment
fumigatione0
Outcome
N(C 2 H 2 )‐fixation ratee0
Direction
not significantly increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In general, N(C 2 H 2 )‐fixation rate was not significantly increased by either inoculation or fumigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1012 · show in text ↑
t0

“field beans ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High inoculum in fumigated plots increased fixation rate at one of four dates.

Taxon
field beanst0
Treatment
adding a high rate of inoculum to the fumigated plotse0
Outcome
N 2 (C 2 H 2 )‐fixation ratee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
one of four sampling datese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Only after adding a high rate of inoculum to the fumigated plots was the N 2 (C 2 H 2 )‐fixation rate increased at one of four sampling dates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1155 · show in text ↑
t0

“field beans ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–59 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors attribute fumigation related growth and yield gains mainly to reduced root rot.

Taxon
field beanst0
Treatment
fumigatione0
Outcome
increase in plant growth and seed yielde0
Qualifier
reduction in root rote0

Verbatim

e0

“the major increase in plant growth and seed yield following fumigation was due to a reduction in root rot rather than from an increase in nodulation or N 2 (C 2 H 2 )‐fixation rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1358 · show in text ↑
t0

“field beans ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application did not increase yield in fumigated or nonfumigated soil.

Taxon
field beanst0
Treatment
Nitrogen application of 112 kg/ha of N in 1975 and 135 kg/ha of N in 1976e0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
did not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen application of 112 kg/ha of N in 1975 and 135 kg/ha of N in 1976 did not increase yields in either fumigated or non‐fumigated soils.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1500 · show in text ↑
t0

“field beans ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–59 · show in text ↑

solarization · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

solarization · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · Rhizobium phaseoli · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

156 papers: 131 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 131 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

152 papers more in this group

See all 156 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.