Paper · 1990 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

Nitrogen Management and Nitrification Inhibitor Effects on Nitrogen‐15 Urea: I. Yield and Fertilizer Use Efficiency

D. T. Walters; G. L. Malzer

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
53
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Nitrification inhibitors (NI) are sometimes recommended for use with ammoniacal fertilizers in corn ( Zea mays L.) production to improve fertilizer N use efficiency (FUE). The objectives of this experiment were to evaluate the effects of the NI nitrapyrin [2‐chloro‐6‐(trichloromethyl) pyridine] application on yield and FUE of irrigated corn, and to monitor the fate of a single application of 15 N‐enriched urea during a multiyear period in both soil and plant. Treatments included a factorial combination of two N rates (90 or 180 kg urea‐N ha −1 yr −1 ) applied during a 3‐yr period, with or without a NI and with or without incorporation, plus a zero‐N control. Twenty‐seven nonweighing lysimeters were used to quantify leaching load. Treatment effects on yield and FUE differed each year due to interactions of climate and N‐management variables. Nonincorporated urea + NI reduced grain yield when leaching load was low and increased yield at the 90 kg ha −1 N rate when leaching load was high. Maximum FUE occurred at the 90 kg ha −1 N rate when leaching load was low. The NI increased FUE only at the 90 kg ha −1 N rate when leaching load was high. Incorporation of urea + NI reduced plant recovery of fertilizer‐derived N (FDN) in the year of application, but resulted in increased uptake of residual FDN in subsequent years. Incorporation of NI with moderate N rates coupled with conservative irrigation management should reduce the risk of yield loss and minimize NO 3 movement to groundwater.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment effects on yield and FUE differed by year with climate and nitrogen management.

Treatment
N‐management variablese0
Outcome
yield and FUEe0
Direction
differede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment effects on yield and FUE differed each year due to interactions of climate and N‐management variables.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–861 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nonincorporated urea with inhibitor reduced grain yield when leaching was low.

Treatment
Nonincorporated urea + NIe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
leaching load was lowe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nonincorporated urea + NI reduced grain yield when leaching load was low”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–934 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nonincorporated urea with inhibitor increased yield at the 90 kg per hectare N rate under high leaching.

Treatment
Nonincorporated urea + NIe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
90 kg ha −1 N rate when leaching load was highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nonincorporated urea + NI reduced grain yield when leaching load was low and increased yield at the 90 kg ha −1 N rate when leaching load was high.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–1009 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–134 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum FUE occurred at 90 kg per hectare N when leaching was low.

Treatment
90 kg ha −1 N ratee0
Outcome
Maximum FUEe0
Direction
Maximume0
Qualifier
leaching load was lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum FUE occurred at the 90 kg ha −1 N rate when leaching load was low.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1084 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inhibitor increased FUE only at 90 kg per hectare N when leaching was high.

Treatment
NIe0
Outcome
FUEe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
only at the 90 kg ha −1 N rate when leaching load was highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The NI increased FUE only at the 90 kg ha −1 N rate when leaching load was high.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1165 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incorporated urea with inhibitor reduced fertilizer nitrogen recovery in the application year.

Treatment
Incorporation of urea + NIe0
Outcome
plant recovery of fertilizer‐derived N (FDN)e0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
in the year of applicatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Incorporation of urea + NI reduced plant recovery of fertilizer‐derived N (FDN) in the year of application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1272 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incorporated urea with inhibitor increased uptake of residual fertilizer nitrogen in subsequent years.

Treatment
Incorporation of urea + NIe0
Outcome
uptake of residual FDNe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in subsequent yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Incorporation of urea + NI reduced plant recovery of fertilizer‐derived N (FDN) in the year of application, but resulted in increased uptake of residual FDN in subsequent years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1343 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–134 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend inhibitor incorporation at moderate N rates with conservative irrigation to limit yield loss and nitrate movement.

Treatment
Incorporation of NI with moderate N rates coupled with conservative irrigation managemente0
Outcome
reduce the risk of yield loss and minimize NO 3 movement to groundwatere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Incorporation of NI with moderate N rates coupled with conservative irrigation management should reduce the risk of yield loss and minimize NO 3 movement to groundwater.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1513 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–134 · show in text ↑

nitrification inhibitor · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 10 positive, 4 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

nitrification inhibitor · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 31 positive, 9 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

nitrification inhibitor · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

489 papers: 403 positive, 86 negative or no effect

402 papers in the same direction as this paper · 83 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

485 papers more in this group

See all 489 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.