Paper · 1995 · jpa

Corn Response to Long‐Term Nitrogen and Phosphorus Fertilization

A. J. Schlegel; J. L. Havlin

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
52
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Accurate fertilizer N recommendations for irrigated continuous corn ( Zea mays L.) production in the Great Plains are important for maximizing productivity and profit, while minimizing environmental impact of fertilizer use. The objectives of this study were to determine the effects of long‐term N and P fertilization on grain yield and fertilizer recovery by irrigated continuous corn and to compare predicted N recommendations with actual N requirements. Six rates of N (0, 40, 80, 120, 160, and 200 lb/acre) and two rates of P (0 and 18 lb P/acre) in a factorial arrangement were applied annually from 1961 to 1991 on a Ulysses silt loam (fine silty, mixed, mesic Aridic Haplustoll) near Tribune, KS. Grain yields were greater with a combination of N and P than with either applied alone. The optimal N rate was about 160 lb N/acre and was relatively constant over time. Averaged over the last 10 yr, application of 160 lb N/acre increased grain yields 46% without P and 103% with P. The yield benefit from applied P has increased over time. With adequate N, P increased grain yields by 29% averaged over 31 yr and 48% over the last 10 yr. Phosphorus fertilization reduced grain moisture from 28 to 23%. Apparent fertilizer N recovery in the grain at 160 lb N/acre was twice as high with P as without P. A N recommendation model was used to compare estimated N requirements with actual N rates required to meet yield goals. Yields obtained with 160 lb N/acre were estimated to require 220 to 260 lb N/acre, or an overestimation of 30 to 60%. These data suggest that the crop factor used in the model may need to be reduced to improve accuracy of N recommendations. Research Question Long term fertilizer use is a common practice for irrigated continuous corn in the Great Plains. Accurately identifying the fertilizer N requirement is important for maximizing productivity and profit, while minimizing environmental impact of fertilizer use. This study quantified the effect of repeated fertilizer applications on optimal N rate and evaluated the accuracy of predicting N requirements using a N recommendation model. Literature Summary Several studies have shown that accurately identifying the optimal N rate is an important N management decision for maximizing fertilizer N recovery by the crop, minimizing residual fertilizer N after harvest, and reducing potential groundwater contamination. Establishing yield goals that are too high or not taking into account residual soil N can result in overestimating N requirements. Adequate amounts of other plant nutrients also are required to maximize fertilizer N recovery. Study Description Six rates of N fertilizer (0, 40, 80, 120, 160, and 200 lb N/acre) and two rates of P (0 and 18 lb P/acre) were applied annually (1961–1991) to irrigated continuous corn on a Ulysses silt loam. Measurements included grain yield, grain N and P, grain moisture, and apparent fertilizer recovery. Applied Question What is the optimum N rate for irrigated continuous corn? In this long‐term study, the optimum N rate was about 160 lb N/acre and was relatively constant across years (Table ). Although fertilizer P was needed to maximize grain yield, it had little effect on optimal N rate. What effect does P have on fertilizer N efficiency and grain production? With optimal N, fertilizer P doubled apparent N fertilizer recovery. Fertilizer P decreased grain moisture and increased grain yields by 48% averaged over 10 yr when applied with optimal N. Do current N recommendation models accurately predict N requirements? No. In 2 yr of the study with average or above average yields, the model overpredicted N needs by 30 to 60% compared with observed optimal N rate. Grain yield response of corn to N and P. 1982–1991 1961–1991 N rate −P +P −P + P lb/acre ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐bu/acre‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 0 82 87 70 73 40 109 131 107 119 80 115 150 121 143 120 114 166 124 159 160 120 177 131 169 200 119 173 132 166

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A combination of N and P gave greater grain yields than either N or P applied alone.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse0
Treatment
combination of N and Pe1
Outcome
grain yieldse1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
either applied alonee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigated continuous corn ( Zea mays L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–93 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grain yields were greater with a combination of N and P than with either applied alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–792 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal N rate for irrigated continuous corn was about 160 lb N/acre.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse0
Outcome
optimal N ratee2
Value
160 lb N/acree2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigated continuous corn ( Zea mays L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–93 · show in text ↑
e2

“The optimal N rate was about 160 lb N/acre and was relatively constant over time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–874 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal N rate was relatively constant over time.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse0
Outcome
optimal N ratee2
Qualifier
relatively constant over timee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigated continuous corn ( Zea mays L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–93 · show in text ↑
e2

“The optimal N rate was about 160 lb N/acre and was relatively constant over time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–874 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 160 lb N/acre increased grain yields by 46% without P over the last 10 yr.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse0
Treatment
160 lb N/acree3
Outcome
grain yieldse3
Direction
increasede3
Value
46%e3
Qualifier
without Pe3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigated continuous corn ( Zea mays L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–93 · show in text ↑
e3

“Averaged over the last 10 yr, application of 160 lb N/acre increased grain yields 46% without P and 103% with P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–987 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 160 lb N/acre increased grain yields by 103% with P over the last 10 yr.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse0
Treatment
160 lb N/acree3
Outcome
grain yieldse3
Direction
increasede3
Value
103%e3
Qualifier
with Pe3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigated continuous corn ( Zea mays L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–93 · show in text ↑
e3

“Averaged over the last 10 yr, application of 160 lb N/acre increased grain yields 46% without P and 103% with P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–987 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With adequate N, P increased grain yields by 29% averaged over 31 yr.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse0
Treatment
With adequate N, Pe4
Outcome
grain yieldse4
Direction
increasede4
Value
29%e4
Qualifier
averaged over 31 yre4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigated continuous corn ( Zea mays L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–93 · show in text ↑
e4

“With adequate N, P increased grain yields by 29% averaged over 31 yr and 48% over the last 10 yr.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With adequate N, P increased grain yields by 48% over the last 10 yr.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse0
Treatment
With adequate N, Pe4
Outcome
grain yieldse4
Direction
increasede4
Value
48%e4
Qualifier
over the last 10 yre4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigated continuous corn ( Zea mays L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–93 · show in text ↑
e4

“With adequate N, P increased grain yields by 29% averaged over 31 yr and 48% over the last 10 yr.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1143 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yield benefit from applied P has increased over time.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse0
Treatment
applied Pe5
Outcome
yield benefit from applied Pe5
Direction
increasede5
Qualifier
over timee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigated continuous corn ( Zea mays L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–93 · show in text ↑
e5

“The yield benefit from applied P has increased over time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1045 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus fertilization reduced grain moisture from 28 to 23%.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse0
Treatment
Phosphorus fertilizatione6
Outcome
grain moisturee6
Direction
reducede6
Value
from 28 to 23%e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigated continuous corn ( Zea mays L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–93 · show in text ↑
e6

“Phosphorus fertilization reduced grain moisture from 28 to 23%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1206 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With P, apparent N fertilizer recovery in the grain at 160 lb N/acre was twice as high as without P.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse0
Treatment
with Pe7
Outcome
Apparent fertilizer N recovery in the graine7
Direction
twice as highe7
Comparator
without Pe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigated continuous corn ( Zea mays L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–93 · show in text ↑
e7

“Apparent fertilizer N recovery in the grain at 160 lb N/acre was twice as high with P as without P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1307 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The N recommendation model overestimated N requirements by 30 to 60% at 160 lb N/acre yield goals.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse0
Treatment
160 lb N/acree7
Outcome
overestimatione7
Value
30 to 60%e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigated continuous corn ( Zea mays L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–93 · show in text ↑
e7

“Yields obtained with 160 lb N/acre were estimated to require 220 to 260 lb N/acre, or an overestimation of 30 to 60%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1544 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The crop factor used in the N recommendation model may need to be reduced to improve accuracy of N recommendations.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse0
Outcome
crop factor used in the model may need to be reducede7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigated continuous corn ( Zea mays L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–93 · show in text ↑
e7

“These data suggest that the crop factor used in the model may need to be reduced to improve accuracy of N recommendations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1546–1667 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer P had little effect on the optimal N rate.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse0
Treatment
fertilizer Pe7
Outcome
optimal N ratee7
Direction
had little effecte7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigated continuous corn ( Zea mays L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–93 · show in text ↑
e7

“Although fertilizer P was needed to maximize grain yield, it had little effect on optimal N rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3132–3229 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

627 papers: 549 positive, 78 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 69 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

623 papers more in this group

See all 627 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.