Paper · 1989 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

Effect of Subsoiling on Yield and Quality of Corn and Potato at Two Irrigation Frequencies

B. A. Ibrahim; D. E. Miller

10
claims
17
verbatim quotes
33
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract High strength soil layers within a rooting zone restrict rooting and reduce the supply of water and nutrients to plants. Frequent irrigation may be required to prevent plant water stress. Studies were conducted in 1983, 1984, and 1985 to evaluate the yield responses of potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.) and field corn ( Zea mays L.) to subsoiling and sprinkler irrigation frequency on Warden loam (coarse‐silty, mixed, mesic Xerollic Camborthids) and Quincy sand (mixed, mesic Xeric Torripsamments) soils. Leaf water potential, stomatal resistance, and canopy temperature were measured. On the loam soil, yield and % U.S. no. 1 potato tubers responded positively to subsoiling with biweekly irrigation but not with weekly irrigation. Corn silage yields were increased by subsoiling with both irrigation regimes but grain yields were not. Plants growing on subsoiled sand and irrigated every 4 d were stressed less than plants grown without subsoiling. With this irrigation regime total tuber yield, % U.S. no. 1 tubers, and corn grain yields were increased by subsoiling. Benefits from subsoiling were relatively unimportant for either crop or soil if irrigation was adequate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoiling increased potato yield on loam with biweekly irrigation.

Treatment
subsoilinge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
positivelye0
Qualifier
biweekly irrigatione0
Setting
loam soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the loam soil, yield and % U.S. no. 1 potato tubers responded positively to subsoiling with biweekly irrigation but not with weekly irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–739 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 54–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoiling increased the percentage of U.S. no. 1 potato tubers on loam with biweekly irrigation.

Treatment
subsoilinge0
Outcome
% U.S. no. 1 potato tuberse0
Direction
positivelye0
Setting
loam soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the loam soil, yield and % U.S. no. 1 potato tubers responded positively to subsoiling with biweekly irrigation but not with weekly irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–739 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 54–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato yield and grade did not respond positively to subsoiling with weekly irrigation.

Treatment
subsoilinge0
Outcome
yield and % U.S. no. 1 potato tuberse0
Direction
note0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the loam soil, yield and % U.S. no. 1 potato tubers responded positively to subsoiling with biweekly irrigation but not with weekly irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–739 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 54–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoiling increased corn silage yield under both irrigation regimes.

Treatment
subsoilinge0
Outcome
Corn silage yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
both irrigation regimese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn silage yields were increased by subsoiling with both irrigation regimes but grain yields were not”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–843 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn grain yield did not increase under subsoiling across the two irrigation regimes on loam.

Treatment
subsoilinge0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
note0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn silage yields were increased by subsoiling with both irrigation regimes but grain yields were not”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–843 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoiled sand plants irrigated every four days were less stressed than nonsubsoiled plants.

Treatment
subsoiled sande0
Outcome
stressede0
Direction
lesse0
Qualifier
every 4 de0
Comparator
without subsoilinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants growing on subsoiled sand and irrigated every 4 d were stressed less than plants grown without subsoiling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 54–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoiling increased total tuber yield under four-day irrigation on sand.

Treatment
subsoilinge0
Outcome
total tuber yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With this irrigation regime total tuber yield, % U.S. no. 1 tubers, and corn grain yields were increased by subsoiling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1077 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 54–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoiling increased U.S. no. 1 tubers under four-day irrigation on sand.

Treatment
subsoilinge0
Outcome
% U.S. no. 1 tuberse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With this irrigation regime total tuber yield, % U.S. no. 1 tubers, and corn grain yields were increased by subsoiling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1077 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 54–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoiling increased corn grain yield under four-day irrigation on sand.

Treatment
subsoilinge0
Outcome
corn grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With this irrigation regime total tuber yield, % U.S. no. 1 tubers, and corn grain yields were increased by subsoiling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1077 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Adequate irrigation made subsoiling benefits relatively unimportant.

Outcome
Benefits from subsoiling were relatively unimportante0
Qualifier
if irrigation was adequatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Benefits from subsoiling were relatively unimportant for either crop or soil if irrigation was adequate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1182 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 54–60 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

52 papers: 34 positive, 18 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

tillage · organism · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.