Paper · 1978 · NDSU Repository (North Dakota State University)

Soil Structure and Crop Production

F. B. Arnold; R.E. Sojka

3
claims
4
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Soil Structural Studies have been conducted to determine the effects of mulches on alleviating sugarbeet stand loss from soil crusting, the effect of seedbed firmness on sugarbeet stand establishment, and the effect of soil compaction on potato production. Results indicate marginal potential for anti-crust mulching in a dry year, point to enhanced sugarbeet stand establishment in firm seedbeds in a dry spring, and indicate an overall negative response of potatoes to Compaction.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Anti-crust mulching had marginal potential in a dry year for sugarbeet stand loss.

Treatment
anti-crust mulchinge0
Outcome
sugarbeet stand losse1
Qualifier
in a dry yeare0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results indicate marginal potential for anti-crust mulching in a dry year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 257–330 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarbeet stand loss from soil crusting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Firm seedbeds enhanced sugarbeet stand establishment in a dry spring.

Treatment
firm seedbedse0
Outcome
sugarbeet stand establishmente0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
in a dry springe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enhanced sugarbeet stand establishment in firm seedbeds in a dry spring”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–412 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potatoes responded negatively overall to compaction.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume0
Treatment
Compactione0
Outcome
response of potatoese0
Direction
negativee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an overall negative response of potatoes to Compaction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–481 · show in text ↑

tillage · organism · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.