Paper · 1975 · Agronomy Journal

Effects of Harvest Date, Plant Density, and Hybrid on Corn Grain Quality1

F. D. Cloninger; R. D. Horrocks; M. S. Zuber

11
claims
25
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Corn ( Zea mays L.) growers often question the effect of delayed fall harvest on grain quality. Various studies have reported the effect of genetic and environmental factors on the quality of grain, but few have reported on date of harvest. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of harvest date, as well as planting density, hybrid, year, and their interactions on the quality of corn grain. Four hybrids were planted at 40,000, 60,000, and 80,000 plants/ha. Harvest dates were October 1, November 1, and December 1 each year of the 3‐year study (1969–71). Grain quality was measured by determining protein and oil content, 1,000‐kernel weight, test weight, and kernel hardness. Standard procedures were used for the first four variables and kernel hardness was determined on a Steinlite Model CK2 corn breakage tester. The only interactions to show significance were those of year with the other main effects. Protein content was not affected by delayed harvest, but did decline significantly with each 20,000 plant/ha increase in planting rate. Oil content varied more among hybrids (3.44 to 4.16%) than years (3.50 to 3.91%), and declined significantly as the harvest date was delayed (3.80 to 3.68%). Kernel weight and kernel breakage were closely related to the environment of the particular growing season. The range in 1,000‐kernel weight among years was 68 g, whereas the maximum differences among hybrids was 34 g. Kernel breakage, an indication of kernel hardness, increased as population was increased from 40,000 to 60,000 plants/ha. When harvest was delayed from October 1 to November 1 kernel breakage increased. This study showed that protein content was not affected by delayed harvest and that kernel breakage was more closely related to the seasonal fluctuations in environmental conditions than to the treatments imposed. On the other hand, oil content showed a 0.12 percentage point decline as harvest was delayed. This decline, although significant, probably has little meaning from the milling point of view since the oil content of corn ranges from 4 to 5% of the whole kernel and not all the oil is extracted in the milling process. However, losses associated with delays in harvest as a result of increased stalk lodging and ear droppage were of greater significance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Only year interactions with main effects were significant.

Outcome
interactionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The only interactions to show significance were those of year with the other main effects.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–949 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed harvest did not affect protein content.

Treatment
delayed harveste0
Outcome
Protein contente0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Protein content was not affected by delayed harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1001 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein content declined significantly with each density increment of 20,000 plant/ha.

Treatment
20,000 plant/ha increase in planting ratee0
Outcome
Protein contente1
Direction
declinee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“did decline significantly with each 20,000 plant/ha increase in planting rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1084 · show in text ↑
e1

“Protein content was not affected by delayed harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1001 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–58 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oil content varied more among hybrids than years.

Material
hybridse0
Outcome
Oil contente0
Direction
varied moree0
Value
3.44 to 4.16%e0
Qualifier
3.50 to 3.91%e0
Comparator
yearse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oil content varied more among hybrids (3.44 to 4.16%) than years (3.50 to 3.91%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1166 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Oil content declined significantly with delayed harvest.

Treatment
harvest date was delayede0
Outcome
Oil contente1
Direction
declinede0
Value
3.80 to 3.68%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“declined significantly as the harvest date was delayed (3.80 to 3.68%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1242 · show in text ↑
e1

“Oil content varied more among hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–58 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kernel weight and breakage were closely related to growing season environment.

Outcome
Kernel weight and kernel breakagee0
Setting
environment of the particular growing seasone0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kernel weight and kernel breakage were closely related to the environment of the particular growing season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1351 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1,000-kernel weight range across years was 68 g.

Outcome
1,000‐kernel weighte0
Value
68 ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The range in 1,000‐kernel weight among years was 68 g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1405 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum difference in 1,000-kernel weight among hybrids was 34 g.

Outcome
1,000‐kernel weighte1
Value
34 ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum differences among hybrids was 34 g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1415–1461 · show in text ↑
e1

“1,000‐kernel weight among years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1365–1396 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing density from 40,000 to 60,000 plants/ha increased kernel breakage.

Treatment
population was increased from 40,000 to 60,000 plants/hae0
Outcome
Kernel breakagee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kernel breakage, an indication of kernel hardness, increased as population was increased from 40,000 to 60,000 plants/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1463–1584 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying harvest from October 1 to November 1 increased kernel breakage.

Treatment
harvest was delayed from October 1 to November 1e0
Outcome
kernel breakagee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When harvest was delayed from October 1 to November 1 kernel breakage increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1585–1665 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–58 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest delay was associated with greater losses from stalk lodging and ear droppage.

Treatment
delays in harveste0
Outcome
lossese0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“losses associated with delays in harvest as a result of increased stalk lodging and ear droppage were of greater significance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2205–2331 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–58 · show in text ↑

stage · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

density · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 19 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.