Paper · 1967 · Crop Science

Effects of Shade Applied at Different Stages of Plant Development on Corn (Zea mays L.) Production1

E. B. Early; W. O. McIlrath; R. D. Seif; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
86
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of reducing the amount of sunlight at the vegetative, reproductive, and maturation phases on the morphology, grain yield, and chemical composition was determined for two corn hybrids. The shade treatments exerted significant reductions inall components measured except those established prior to initiation of treatment. Shading for 21 days during the reproductive phase was more detrimental to grain production per plant than shading for longer periods during vegetative and maturation phases. When shaded at 60, 70, and 80% during the vegetative or reproductive phase, Hy2 ✕ Oh41 produced more grain per plant than WF9 ✕ C103, while the reverse was true during the maturation phase. The hybrids exhibited a differential response to shade treatments only during the vegetative phase. With respect to number of kernels and grain yield, shading during the vegetative phase was more detrimental to WF9 ✕ C103 than Hy2 ✕ Oh41 while the reverse was true during the reproductive phase. During maturation the reduction in grain protein was not proportionally as great as the reduction in grain yield for both hybrids. Extensive vegetative growth during the first 54 days was not a prerequisite for a high grain yield per plant. These observations provide an explanation for the frequent failure of starter fertilizers to enhance grain yield and suggest management practices that might produce higher yields. Plants shaded at 60% or higher during the reproductive phase had a full complement of normal leaves, but initiated and developed only a limited number of kernels. Weight per kernel and stover weight per plant at the end of the season were less than that of the control plant. Since these leaves were exposed to full sunlight from August 8 to the end of the season, they must have been essentially nonoperative during this period.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade treatments significantly reduced all measured components of corn except those established before treatment began.

Treatment
The shade treatmentse0
Outcome
all components measurede0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“The shade treatments exerted significant reductions inall components measured except those established prior to initiation of treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–331 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading for 21 days in the reproductive phase reduced grain production per plant more than longer shading in the vegetative or maturation phases.

Treatment
Shading for 21 days during the reproductive phasee0
Outcome
grain production per plante0
Direction
more detrimentale0
Comparator
shading for longer periods during vegetative and maturation phasese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“Shading for 21 days during the reproductive phase was more detrimental to grain production per plant than shading for longer periods during vegetative and maturation phases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–505 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

When shaded at 60, 70 and 80% in the vegetative or reproductive phase, Hy2 x Oh41 produced more grain per plant than WF9 x C103.

Material
Hy2 ✕ Oh41e0
Outcome
grain per plante0
Direction
moree0
Qualifier
shaded at 60, 70, and 80% during the vegetative or reproductive phasee0
Comparator
WF9 ✕ C103e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“When shaded at 60, 70, and 80% during the vegetative or reproductive phase, Hy2 ✕ Oh41 produced more grain per plant than WF9 ✕ C103, while the reverse was true during the maturation phase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–695 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

When shaded in the maturation phase, WF9 x C103 produced more grain per plant than Hy2 x Oh41.

Material
WF9 ✕ C103e0
Outcome
grain per plante0
Direction
the reversee0
Qualifier
during the maturation phasee0
Comparator
Hy2 ✕ Oh41e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“When shaded at 60, 70, and 80% during the vegetative or reproductive phase, Hy2 ✕ Oh41 produced more grain per plant than WF9 ✕ C103, while the reverse was true during the maturation phase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–695 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two hybrids differed in their response to shade only during the vegetative phase.

Outcome
differential response to shade treatmentse0
Qualifier
only during the vegetative phasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“The hybrids exhibited a differential response to shade treatments only during the vegetative phase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–795 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading in the vegetative phase reduced kernel number and grain yield more in WF9 x C103 than in Hy2 x Oh41.

Material
WF9 ✕ C103e0
Treatment
shading during the vegetative phasee0
Outcome
number of kernels and grain yielde0
Direction
more detrimentale0
Comparator
Hy2 ✕ Oh41e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“With respect to number of kernels and grain yield, shading during the vegetative phase was more detrimental to WF9 ✕ C103 than Hy2 ✕ Oh41 while the reverse was true during the reproductive phase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–991 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading in the reproductive phase reduced kernel number and grain yield more in Hy2 x Oh41 than in WF9 x C103.

Material
Hy2 ✕ Oh41e0
Treatment
during the reproductive phasee0
Outcome
number of kernels and grain yielde0
Direction
the reversee0
Comparator
WF9 ✕ C103e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“With respect to number of kernels and grain yield, shading during the vegetative phase was more detrimental to WF9 ✕ C103 than Hy2 ✕ Oh41 while the reverse was true during the reproductive phase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–991 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During maturation, shading reduced grain protein proportionally less than grain yield in both hybrids.

Treatment
During maturatione0
Outcome
grain proteine0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“During maturation the reduction in grain protein was not proportionally as great as the reduction in grain yield for both hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1122 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extensive vegetative growth in the first 54 days was not a prerequisite for high grain yield per plant.

Outcome
high grain yield per plante0
Qualifier
Extensive vegetative growth during the first 54 days was not a prerequisitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“Extensive vegetative growth during the first 54 days was not a prerequisite for a high grain yield per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1232 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants shaded at 60% or more in the reproductive phase kept normal leaves but initiated and developed only a limited number of kernels.

Treatment
shaded at 60% or higher during the reproductive phasee0
Outcome
limited number of kernelse0
Direction
limitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plants shaded at 60% or higher during the reproductive phase had a full complement of normal leaves, but initiated and developed only a limited number of kernels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1575 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the end of the season weight per kernel and stover weight per plant of shaded plants were lower than the control plant.

Outcome
Weight per kernel and stover weight per plante0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
the control plante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“Weight per kernel and stover weight per plant at the end of the season were less than that of the control plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1577–1688 · show in text ↑

shade · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

53 papers: 7 positive, 46 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

stage · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.