Paper · 2012 · The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences

FORAGE QUALITY OF MAIZE AND LEGUMES AS MONOCULTURES AND MIXTURES AT DIFFERENT SEED RATIOS

Muhammad Ibrahim; M. Ayub; Asif Tanveer; et al.

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
25
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Livestock is an important sector of agriculture, but good quality forage is one of the major limiting factors for the growth of this industry. Studies were conducted to compare the forage quality of maize and legumes sown in pure stand and in mixture in randomized complete blocks during 2005 and 2006 at the University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan. Maize (Zea mays L.) and three legumes [cluster bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba), cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.), and sesbania (Sesbania sesban)] were sown at 100% the recommended seeding rate and in maize:legume mixtures at seed ratios (SR) of 75:25, 50:50 and 25:75. Crude protein (CP) and ether extractable fat (EEF) percentage of maize increased with the increase in seeding rate of legumes in all maize-legume mixtures over sole maize. Crude fibre (CF) percentage of forage maize was the maximum in sole maize. All monoculture legumes produced highest CP and EEF percentage than their mixtures with maize. Mixtures of maize-sesbania gave higher CP and EEF than maize-cowpea or maize-cluster bean at similar seed ratios, while cowpea sown alone or in mixture with maize had higher total ash than other legumes at same seed ratios. Farmers may grow maize+sesbania to get good quality forage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize crude protein and ether extractable fat rose with legume seeding rate relative to sole maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
increase in seeding rate of legumese0
Outcome
Crude protein (CP) and ether extractable fat (EEF) percentagee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
sole maizee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crude protein (CP) and ether extractable fat (EEF) percentage of maize increased with the increase in seeding rate of legumes in all maize-legume mixtures over sole maize.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–801 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole maize had maximum crude fibre percentage.

Taxon
forage maizee0
Material
sole maizee0
Outcome
Crude fibre (CF) percentagee0
Direction
maximume0

Verbatim

e0

“Crude fibre (CF) percentage of forage maize was the maximum in sole maize.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–876 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monoculture legumes had higher crude protein and ether extractable fat than mixtures with maize.

Taxon
legumese0
Treatment
monoculture legumese0
Outcome
CP and EEF percentagee0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
their mixtures with maizee0

Verbatim

e0

“All monoculture legumes produced highest CP and EEF percentage than their mixtures with maize.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–971 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize-sesbania mixtures had higher crude protein and ether extractable fat than maize-cowpea or maize-cluster bean at equal ratios.

Taxon
maize-sesbaniae0
Treatment
Mixtures of maize-sesbaniae0
Outcome
CP and EEFe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
maize-cowpea or maize-cluster beane0

Verbatim

e0

“Mixtures of maize-sesbania gave higher CP and EEF than maize-cowpea or maize-cluster bean at similar seed ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1084 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea alone or with maize had higher total ash than other legumes at equal ratios.

Outcome
total ashe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other legumese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cowpea sown alone or in mixture with maize had higher total ash than other legumes at same seed ratios.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1195 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Farmers may grow maize with sesbania to obtain good quality forage.

Taxon
maize+sesbaniae0
Outcome
grow maize+sesbania to get good quality foragee0

Verbatim

e0

“Farmers may grow maize+sesbania to get good quality forage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1255 · show in text ↑

density · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 19 positive, 14 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.