Paper · 2002 · Canadian Journal of Soil Science

Concentrations of K, Ca and Mg in maize colonized by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under field conditions

A. Liu; C. Hamel; A. Elmi; et al.

7
claims
18
verbatim quotes
82
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Little attention has been paid to the effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi on the uptake of nutrients that move mainly by mass flow. The objective of this study was to assess the possible contribution of indigenous AM fungi to the K, Ca and Mg nutrition of maize (Zea mays L.) as influenced by soil P levels and its impact on plant dry mass. The field experiment had a split plot design with four replicates. Treatments included soil fumigation status (fumigation and non-fumigation) and three levels of P fertilization (0, 60 and 120 kg P 2 O 5 ha -1 ) in a loamy sand soil in 1997 and a fine sandy loam soil in 1998. Soil fumigati on with Basamid ® was used to suppress indigenous AM fungi. Plants were sampled at four different growth stages (6-leaf stage, 10-leaf stage, tasseling and silking). Soil fumigation decreased shoot dry weight, but P fertilization increased shoot dry weight at most sampling times. When no P fertilizer was added, fumigation in the loamy sand soil reduced shoot K and Ca concentrations while, in contrast, in the fine sandy loam soil only Mg concentration was reduced by soil fumigation. The concentration of K in maize shoots was positively correlated (P < 0.05) with extraradicular hyphal length in both soils. The correlation between the abundance of extraradicular hyphae and the concentrations of Ca and Mg in maize shoots was significant only for soils where available Ca or Mg was relatively low. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi could increase corn biomass production and K, Ca and Mg uptake in soil low in these elements and low in P. These results indicate that the contribution of mycorrhizae to maize K, Ca and Mg nutrition can be significant in a field situation and that the extent of this contribution depends on the availability of these nutrients and of P in soils. Key words: Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, soil fumigation, extraradicular hyphae, uptake of K, Ca, and Mg, soil P levels, maize

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil fumigation to suppress AM fungi decreased maize shoot dry weight compared with non-fumigated soil.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
soil fumigatione1
Interactor
indigenous AM fungie3symbiont
Outcome
shoot dry weighte1
Direction
decreasede1
Comparator
non-fumigatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutrition of maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–283 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soil fumigation decreased shoot dry weight, but P fertilization increased shoot dry weight at most sampling times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–919 · show in text ↑
e2

“Treatments included soil fumigation status (fumigation and non-fumigation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–490 · show in text ↑
e3

“was used to suppress indigenous AM fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–698 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P fertilization increased maize shoot dry weight at most sampling times.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
P fertilizatione1
Outcome
shoot dry weighte1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
at most sampling timese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutrition of maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–283 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soil fumigation decreased shoot dry weight, but P fertilization increased shoot dry weight at most sampling times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–919 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil fumigation without P fertilizer reduced maize shoot K and Ca concentrations in the loamy sand soil.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
fumigatione1
Outcome
shoot K and Ca concentrationse1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
When no P fertilizer was addede1
Comparator
non-fumigatione2
Setting
loamy sand soile1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutrition of maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–283 · show in text ↑
e1

“When no P fertilizer was added, fumigation in the loamy sand soil reduced shoot K and Ca concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1024 · show in text ↑
e2

“Treatments included soil fumigation status (fumigation and non-fumigation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–490 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil fumigation reduced maize shoot Mg concentration in the fine sandy loam soil.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
soil fumigatione1
Outcome
Mg concentratione1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
non-fumigatione2
Setting
fine sandy loam soile1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutrition of maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–283 · show in text ↑
e1

“in the fine sandy loam soil only Mg concentration was reduced by soil fumigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1125 · show in text ↑
e2

“Treatments included soil fumigation status (fumigation and non-fumigation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–490 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot K concentration in maize was positively correlated with extraradicular hyphal length in both soils.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
concentration of K in maize shootse1
Direction
positively correlatede1
Qualifier
P < 0.05e1
Setting
both soilse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutrition of maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–283 · show in text ↑
e1

“The concentration of K in maize shoots was positively correlated (P < 0.05) with extraradicular hyphal length in both soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1250 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Extraradicular hyphae correlated with Ca and Mg concentrations in maize shoots only in soils where available Ca or Mg was relatively low.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Interactor
extraradicular hyphaee1symbiont
Outcome
concentrations of Ca and Mg in maize shootse1
Qualifier
soils where available Ca or Mg was relatively lowe1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutrition of maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–283 · show in text ↑
e1

“The correlation between the abundance of extraradicular hyphae and the concentrations of Ca and Mg in maize shoots was significant only for soils where available Ca or Mg was relatively low”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1441 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi could increase corn biomass and K, Ca and Mg uptake in soil low in these elements and low in P.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Interactor
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie1symbiont
Outcome
corn biomass production and K, Ca and Mg uptakee1
Direction
increasee1
Qualifier
soil low in these elements and low in Pe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutrition of maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–283 · show in text ↑
e1

“Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi could increase corn biomass production and K, Ca and Mg uptake in soil low in these elements and low in P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1443–1577 · show in text ↑

solarization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

solarization · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,365 papers: 1,196 positive, 169 negative or no effect

1,195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 149 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1,361 papers more in this group

See all 1,365 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.