Paper · 1993 · Agronomy Journal

Soil Fumigation within Monoculture and Rotations: Response of Corn and Mycorrhizae

Michael D. Jawson; Alan J. Franzluebbers; Deborah K. Galusha; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
45
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The causative factors for corn ( Zea mays L.) response to methyl bromide (CH 3 Br) fumigation, in the absence of known specific pathogens, are unknown. This study was conducted to determine if deleterious nonspecific rhizosphere microorganisms are the causative agents. Soil fumigation was postulated to increase yield of continuous corn but to have less effect on the yield of corn grown in rotation, because more deleterious rhizosphere microorganisms were suspected in monoculture than in rotation. The effects of fumigation and crop rotation on corn grain yield, plant height and P content, available soil N and P, mycorrhizal infection, and soil microbial biomass were investigated at two sites near Mead, NE, on a Sharpsburg silty clay loam soil (fine, montmorillonitic, mesic Typic Argiudoll). Methyl bromide treatments were applied prior to planting for 4 yr at one site and 2 yr at the other site. The sites differed in fertilization, pest management, and crop sequences, but both contained continuous corn. Fumigation resulted in an increase in grain yield under monoculture only once in six site years. Unexpectedly, however, fumigation resulted in a decrease in grain yield under rotation in 7 of 12 observations. Plants in fumigated soil were P‐deficient early in the growing season despite similar soil test P concentrations in control and fumigated plots. Fumigation reduced mycorrhizal infection and soil microbial biomass. Mycorrhizal infection of corn shortly after germination appears to be important to initial corn growth in this soil. Fumigating soil revealed a considerable biological influence on corn growth and yield by reducing both deleterious and beneficial microorganisms.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methyl bromide fumigation increased corn grain yield under monoculture only once in six site years.

Treatment
Fumigatione3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
increasee3
Qualifier
under monoculture only once in six site yearse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The causative factors for corn ( Zea mays L.) response to methyl bromide (CH 3 Br) fumigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–102 · show in text ↑
e3

“Fumigation resulted in an increase in grain yield under monoculture only once in six site years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methyl bromide fumigation decreased corn grain yield under rotation in 7 of 12 observations.

Treatment
fumigatione4
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
decreasee4
Qualifier
under rotation in 7 of 12 observationse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The causative factors for corn ( Zea mays L.) response to methyl bromide (CH 3 Br) fumigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–102 · show in text ↑
e4

“fumigation resulted in a decrease in grain yield under rotation in 7 of 12 observations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1233 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants in fumigated soil were P-deficient early in the growing season.

Treatment
fumigated soile5
Outcome
P‐deficiente5
Comparator
controle5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The causative factors for corn ( Zea mays L.) response to methyl bromide (CH 3 Br) fumigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–102 · show in text ↑
e5

“Plants in fumigated soil were P‐deficient early in the growing season despite similar soil test P concentrations in control and fumigated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fumigation did not change soil test P concentrations relative to control plots.

Treatment
fumigated plotse5
Outcome
soil test P concentrationse5
Direction
no_changeinferrede5
Comparator
controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The causative factors for corn ( Zea mays L.) response to methyl bromide (CH 3 Br) fumigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–102 · show in text ↑
e5

“Plants in fumigated soil were P‐deficient early in the growing season despite similar soil test P concentrations in control and fumigated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fumigation reduced mycorrhizal infection of corn.

Treatment
Fumigatione6
Interactor
Mycorrhizaet0symbiont
Outcome
mycorrhizal infectione6
Direction
reducede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The causative factors for corn ( Zea mays L.) response to methyl bromide (CH 3 Br) fumigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–102 · show in text ↑
e6

“Fumigation reduced mycorrhizal infection and soil microbial biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1447 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of Corn and Mycorrhizae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fumigation reduced soil microbial biomass.

Treatment
Fumigatione6
Outcome
soil microbial biomasse6
Direction
reducede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The causative factors for corn ( Zea mays L.) response to methyl bromide (CH 3 Br) fumigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–102 · show in text ↑
e6

“Fumigation reduced mycorrhizal infection and soil microbial biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1447 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal infection of corn shortly after germination appears to be important to initial corn growth in this soil.

Treatment
Mycorrhizal infectione7
Outcome
initial corn growthe7

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The causative factors for corn ( Zea mays L.) response to methyl bromide (CH 3 Br) fumigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–102 · show in text ↑
e7

“Mycorrhizal infection of corn shortly after germination appears to be important to initial corn growth in this soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1449–1564 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fumigating soil reduced both deleterious and beneficial microorganisms.

Treatment
Fumigating soile1
Outcome
deleterious and beneficial microorganismse1
Direction
reducinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The causative factors for corn ( Zea mays L.) response to methyl bromide (CH 3 Br) fumigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fumigating soil revealed a considerable biological influence on corn growth and yield by reducing both deleterious and beneficial microorganisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1566–1710 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fumigating soil revealed a considerable biological influence on corn growth and yield.

Treatment
Fumigating soile1
Outcome
corn growth and yielde1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The causative factors for corn ( Zea mays L.) response to methyl bromide (CH 3 Br) fumigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fumigating soil revealed a considerable biological influence on corn growth and yield by reducing both deleterious and beneficial microorganisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1566–1710 · show in text ↑

solarization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

solarization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.