Paper · 2006 · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Effects of Nitric Oxide on Fatty Acid Composition in Peach Fruits during Storage

Shuhua Zhu; Jie Zhou

9
claims
21
verbatim quotes
36
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Peach (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch., cv. Feicheng) fruits were fumigated with 0, 5, 10, and 15 microL/L nitric oxide (NO), and the effects of NO on rot index, ion leakage, and the lipid compositions in peach fruits were studied. The results showed that the treatment with 10 microL/L NO significantly increased the contents of the palmitoleic (16:1), oleic (18:1), and linolenic (18:3) acid in phospholipid (PL), while it decreased the contents of linoleic (18:2) acid in PL. The content of monoacylglycerol (MG) in fruit fumigated with 10 microL/L NO were higher than in the control but lower in fruit fumigated with 15 microL/L NO. The treatment with 10 microL/L NO increased the content of MG, decreased the contents of diacylglycerol (DG) and triacylglycerol (TG). However, there was no significant difference in the contents of free fatty acid (FFA). The compositions of MG, DG, TG, and FFA in peach fruit were also changed by the treatment with 10 microL/L NO. It could preserve the content of 18:3, maintain the integrity of membrane, and prevent the softening and rotting of peach fruit. The content of 18:1 was detected in PL and FFA but not in MG, DG, and TG. This might be due to the different compositions of MG, DG, and TG.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

10 microL/L NO increased palmitoleic, oleic, and linolenic acid contents in phospholipids.

Treatment
10 microL/L NOe0
Outcome
contents of the palmitoleic (16:1), oleic (18:1), and linolenic (18:3) acid in phospholipid (PL)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment with 10 microL/L NO significantly increased the contents of the palmitoleic (16:1), oleic (18:1), and linolenic (18:3) acid in phospholipid (PL)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–410 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10 microL/L NO decreased linoleic acid content in phospholipids.

Treatment
10 microL/L NOe1
Outcome
contents of linoleic (18:2) acid in PLe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it decreased the contents of linoleic (18:2) acid in PL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–473 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
e1

“The content of monoacylglycerol (MG) in fruit fumigated with 10 microL/L NO were higher than in the control but lower in fruit fumigated with 15 microL/L NO.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–632 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MG content was higher with 10 microL/L NO than control.

Treatment
10 microL/L NOe0
Outcome
content of monoacylglycerol (MG)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The content of monoacylglycerol (MG) in fruit fumigated with 10 microL/L NO were higher than in the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–582 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MG content was lower with 15 microL/L NO.

Treatment
15 microL/L NOe0
Outcome
content of monoacylglycerol (MG)e1
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but lower in fruit fumigated with 15 microL/L NO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–631 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
e1

“The content of monoacylglycerol (MG) in fruit fumigated with 10 microL/L NO were higher than in the control but lower in fruit fumigated with 15 microL/L NO.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–632 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10 microL/L NO decreased DG and TG contents.

Treatment
10 microL/L NOe0
Outcome
contents of diacylglycerol (DG) and triacylglycerol (TG)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment with 10 microL/L NO increased the content of MG, decreased the contents of diacylglycerol (DG) and triacylglycerol (TG).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–767 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FFA content had no significant difference.

Treatment
Nitric Oxidet1
Outcome
contents of free fatty acid (FFA)e0
Direction
no significant differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no significant difference in the contents of free fatty acid (FFA).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–854 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
t1

“Nitric Oxide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10 microL/L NO changed the composition of MG, DG, TG, and FFA.

Treatment
10 microL/L NOe0
Outcome
compositions of MG, DG, TG, and FFAe0
Direction
changede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The compositions of MG, DG, TG, and FFA in peach fruit were also changed by the treatment with 10 microL/L NO.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–965 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NO could preserve 18:3 content and membrane integrity and prevent peach softening and rotting.

Treatment
Nitric Oxidet1
Outcome
softening and rotting of peach fruite0
Qualifier
preserve the content of 18:3, maintain the integrity of membranee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It could preserve the content of 18:3, maintain the integrity of membrane, and prevent the softening and rotting of peach fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1094 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
t1

“Nitric Oxide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–23 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

18:1 was detected in PL and FFA but absent from MG, DG, and TG.

Outcome
18:1 was detected in PL and FFA but not in MG, DG, and TGe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The content of 18:1 was detected in PL and FFA but not in MG, DG, and TG.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1168 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑

nitric oxide · molecular: metabolites · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.