Abstract
The effect of nitric oxide (NO) on quality of 'Mibaekdo' peach (Prunus persica) was studied to investigate factors affecting consumer acceptance. Experiment 1) After harvest 'Mibaekdo' peaches were treated with 100 L.L NO for 5 hr and stored at 20 to examine the quality. Experiment 2) Peaches were treated with 100 L.L NO before or after cold storage (0) and stored at room temperature (RT, 25) to examine the point of NO treatment to maintain quality during transport after cold storage. During storage, ethylene and CO production, weight loss, softening, soluble solids content (SSC), pH, color and quality index were examined. NO treatment after harvest suppressed or decreased CO production, Hunter 'L', 'a', and 'b', but there were no effect on ethylene production, SSC, and pH. As a result of quality index, peach treated with NO maintained during storage periods. In the aspect of cold storage NO should be treated after cold storage and before RT transport. NO application after cold storage was better than without NO; also, NO before cold storage affected quality maintenance by delaying loss of firmness and Hunter 'L' and increasing Hunter 'a'. In 'Mibaekdo' peach, NO treatment at both after harvest and cold storage did not affect ethylene production, unlike previous study related to NO. Overall, the results indicate that NO has potential for maintaining peach quality during storage, but its efficacy can be affected by treatment time as well as by horticultural commodities.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Postharvest NO suppressed or decreased CO production.
- Taxon
- peach
Prunus persicat0 - Treatment
- NO treatment after harveste0
- Outcome
- CO productione0
- Direction
- suppressed or decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“NO treatment after harvest suppressed or decreased CO production, Hunter 'L', 'a', and 'b', but there were no effect on ethylene production, SSC, and pH.”
t0“Peach”
Claim · model-written summary
Postharvest NO decreased Hunter L, a and b color measures.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- NO treatment after harveste0
- Outcome
- Hunter 'L', 'a', and 'b'e0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“NO treatment after harvest suppressed or decreased CO production, Hunter 'L', 'a', and 'b', but there were no effect on ethylene production, SSC, and pH.”
t0“Peach”
Claim · model-written summary
Postharvest NO had no effect on ethylene production.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- NO treatment after harveste0
- Outcome
- ethylene productione0
- Direction
- no effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“NO treatment after harvest suppressed or decreased CO production, Hunter 'L', 'a', and 'b', but there were no effect on ethylene production, SSC, and pH.”
t0“Peach”
Claim · model-written summary
Postharvest NO had no effect on soluble solids content.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- NO treatment after harveste0
- Outcome
- SSCe0
- Direction
- no effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“NO treatment after harvest suppressed or decreased CO production, Hunter 'L', 'a', and 'b', but there were no effect on ethylene production, SSC, and pH.”
t0“Peach”
Claim · model-written summary
Postharvest NO had no effect on pH.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- NO treatment after harveste0
- Outcome
- pHe0
- Direction
- no effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“NO treatment after harvest suppressed or decreased CO production, Hunter 'L', 'a', and 'b', but there were no effect on ethylene production, SSC, and pH.”
t0“Peach”
Claim · model-written summary
NO-treated peaches maintained quality index during storage.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicae0
- Treatment
- NOe0
- Outcome
- quality indexe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“As a result of quality index, peach treated with NO maintained during storage periods.”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend NO after cold storage and before room-temperature transport.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- NOe0
- Outcome
- treated after cold storage and before RT transporte0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“NO should be treated after cold storage and before RT transport.”
t0“Peach”
Claim · model-written summary
NO application after cold storage was better for quality than no NO.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- NO application after cold storagee0
- Outcome
- bettere0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- without NOe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“NO application after cold storage was better than without NO”
t0“Peach”
Claim · model-written summary
NO before cold storage delayed firmness loss.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- NO before cold storagee0
- Outcome
- loss of firmnesse0
- Direction
- delayinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“NO before cold storage affected quality maintenance by delaying loss of firmness and Hunter 'L' and increasing Hunter 'a'.”
t0“Peach”
Claim · model-written summary
NO before cold storage delayed the loss of Hunter L.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- NO before cold storagee0
- Outcome
- Hunter 'L'e0
- Direction
- delayinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“NO before cold storage affected quality maintenance by delaying loss of firmness and Hunter 'L' and increasing Hunter 'a'.”
t0“Peach”
Claim · model-written summary
NO before cold storage increased Hunter a.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- NO before cold storagee0
- Outcome
- Hunter 'a'e0
- Direction
- increasinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“NO before cold storage affected quality maintenance by delaying loss of firmness and Hunter 'L' and increasing Hunter 'a'.”
t0“Peach”
Claim · model-written summary
NO at both postharvest and cold storage did not affect ethylene production.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- NO treatment at both after harvest and cold storagee0
- Outcome
- ethylene productione0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“NO treatment at both after harvest and cold storage did not affect ethylene production”
t0“Peach”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude NO may maintain peach quality, with efficacy dependent on timing and commodity.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicae0
- Outcome
- maintaining peach quality during storagee0
- Qualifier
- efficacy can be affected by treatment time as well as by horticultural commoditiese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“NO has potential for maintaining peach quality during storage, but its efficacy can be affected by treatment time as well as by horticultural commodities.”
The same questions in other papers
nitric oxide · physiology: hormones · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
nitric oxide · molecular: metabolites · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →nitric oxide · quality: postharvest · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →cold · physiology: hormones · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →cold · quality: postharvest · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.