Paper · 2011 · Acta Physiologiae Plantarum

Response of barley seedlings to water deficit and enhanced UV-B irradiation acting alone and in combination

Hanna Bandurska; Małgorzata Pietrowska-Borek; Małgorzata Cieślak

15
claims
15
verbatim quotes
57
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Responses of barley seedlings to water deficit (WD) induced by polyethylene glycol (PEG 6000) and ultraviolet (UV-B; 280–320 nm) radiation and their interaction (UV-B + WD) were examined. A decrease in dry matter yield and water content of leaves and roots was observed following application of WD and UV-B + WD, while no changes were found after treating barley plants with UV-B. Proline content was increased in leaves under WD conditions and UV-B + WD. In contrast, UV-B treatment had no effect on the accumulation of proline in leaves of barley plants. Changes in root proline content showed a varied response: WD induced an increase in the level of this amino acid, while UV-B as well as UV-B + WD suppressed root proline content. The lipid peroxidation product malondialdehyde (MDA) was increased in leaves under WD and UV-B + WD stresses. Root MDA content increased in WD-stressed plants, but it decreased in the case of combined application of both stresses. The applied stress factors operated in a variable manner on phenylpropanoid metabolism. Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) activity in leaves and roots was stimulated after exposure to WD and application of UV-B + WD stresses, while UV-B stress did not affect its activity. On the other hand, UV-B treatment enhanced the activity of 4:coumarate-CoA ligase (4CL) in leaves and this enhancement was positively correlated with the accumulation of anthocyanins and flavonols. However, the combined application of WD and UV-B reduced the positive effect of UV-B on the accumulation of these compounds and the activity of 4CL. Surprisingly, anthocyanins and flavonols were not detected in roots of examined barley seedlings despite increased 4CL activity. The results suggest that UV-B-induced activation of 4CL as well as accumulation of anthocyanin and flavonols in leaves is beneficial for the response to this stress factor. On the other hand, WD-induced reduction of the effect of UV-B on 4CL activity and the contents of anthocyanin and flavonol might be a cause of membrane damage in UV-B- and WD-stressed plants. In addition, conversely to what could be expected, the UV-B effect was perceived by the water-stressed roots, which exhibited reduced lipid peroxidation (MDA) and proline accumulation in WD-stressed plants exposed to UV-B.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit and combined UV-B and water deficit reduced dry matter yield and leaf and root water content.

Treatment
WD and UV-B + WDe0
Outcome
dry matter yield and water content of leaves and rootse0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A decrease in dry matter yield and water content of leaves and roots was observed following application of WD and UV-B + WD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B alone did not change dry matter yield or leaf and root water content.

Treatment
UV-Be0
Outcome
no changese0
Direction
no changese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while no changes were found after treating barley plants with UV-B”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–379 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit and combined stress increased leaf proline.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
WD conditions and UV-B + WDe0
Outcome
Proline contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Proline content was increased in leaves under WD conditions and UV-B + WD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B alone had no effect on leaf proline accumulation.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
UV-B treatmente0
Outcome
accumulation of prolinee0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UV-B treatment had no effect on the accumulation of proline in leaves of barley plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–555 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit increased root proline.

Treatment
WDe0
Outcome
level of this amino acide0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“WD induced an increase in the level of this amino acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–669 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B and combined stress suppressed root proline.

Treatment
UV-B as well as UV-B + WDe0
Outcome
root proline contente0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“UV-B as well as UV-B + WD suppressed root proline content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–734 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit and combined stress increased leaf MDA.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
WD and UV-B + WD stressese0
Outcome
malondialdehyde (MDA)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“malondialdehyde (MDA) was increased in leaves under WD and UV-B + WD stresses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–844 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit increased root MDA.

Treatment
WD-stressede0
Outcome
Root MDA contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Root MDA content increased in WD-stressed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined stress decreased root MDA.

Treatment
combined application of both stressese0
Outcome
ite0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“but it decreased in the case of combined application of both stresses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–965 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit and combined stress stimulated leaf and root PAL activity.

Organ / stage
leaves and rootse0
Treatment
WD and application of UV-B + WD stressese0
Outcome
Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) activitye0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) activity in leaves and roots was stimulated after exposure to WD and application of UV-B + WD stresses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1191 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B did not affect PAL activity.

Treatment
UV-B stresse0
Outcome
its activitye0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“UV-B stress did not affect its activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1238 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B enhanced leaf 4CL activity.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
UV-B treatmente0
Outcome
activity of 4:coumarate-CoA ligase (4CL)e0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“UV-B treatment enhanced the activity of 4:coumarate-CoA ligase (4CL) in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1337 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf 4CL enhancement was positively correlated with anthocyanin and flavonol accumulation.

Outcome
accumulation of anthocyanins and flavonolse0
Direction
positively correlatede0
Qualifier
this enhancemente0

Not reportedTaxonGene

Verbatim

e0

“this enhancement was positively correlated with the accumulation of anthocyanins and flavonols”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1436 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined water deficit and UV-B reduced the UV-B effect on anthocyanins, flavonols, and 4CL activity.

Treatment
combined application of WD and UV-Be0
Outcome
accumulation of these compounds and the activity of 4CLe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
UV-Be0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of WD and UV-B reduced the positive effect of UV-B on the accumulation of these compounds and the activity of 4CL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1451–1585 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Anthocyanins and flavonols were undetected in roots despite increased 4CL activity.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
anthocyanins and flavonols were not detectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“anthocyanins and flavonols were not detected in roots of examined barley seedlings despite increased 4CL activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1601–1714 · show in text ↑

uv · physiology: osmolytes · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

uv · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

8 papers: 0 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

drought · physiology: osmolytes · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

12 papers: 8 positive, 4 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

drought · physiology: oxidative · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

22 papers: 2 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

uv · physiology: oxidative · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

uv · molecular: metabolites · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

drought · molecular: metabolites · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 12 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

drought · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

102 papers: 9 positive, 93 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.