Paper · 1986 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

FACTORS CONTROLLING THE RESPONSE OF FIELD CROPS TO VERY LOW DOSES OF GAMMA IRRADIATION OF THE SEED

S. C. SHEPPARD; W. G. EVENDEN

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Stimulation of growth by very low doses of ionizing radiation, or hormesis, is a widely documented phenomenon. The biochemical mechanisms are unclear and the phenomenon is sporadic, controlled by factors as yet only poorly understood. Our study addressed factors reported to control the growth response of plants to seed irradiation. A growth chamber experiment compared the effects of four radiation sources on three crop species. Early emergence of flax (Linum usitatissimum) and early growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and barley (Hordeum vulgare) were increased by irradiation. These effects did not vary as a function of the photon-energy or dose-rate of the sources. Three field experiments were conducted where various cultivars and seed lots of wheat were irradiated at doses of 0.5–50 Gy using Cobalt-60. Early emergence was significantly accelerated in 7 of 18 seed lots. Grain yields were significantly increased in five cases for Neepawa or Glenlea cultivars, but were significantly decreased in nine other cases. The effects were not consistently related to measured seed lot characteristics, manipulation of the seed moisture content prior to irradiation, or the post-seeding environment as varied by delayed planting. In conclusion, there was some evidence of hormesis in emergence and early growth, but these effects did not persist to yield a benefit at harvest.Key words: Hormesis, stimulation, wheat, barley, flax, irradiation

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation increased early flax emergence.

Treatment
irradiatione0
Outcome
Early emergencee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early emergence of flax (Linum usitatissimum) and early growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and barley (Hordeum vulgare) were increased by irradiation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–583 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation increased early wheat growth.

Treatment
irradiatione0
Outcome
early growthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early emergence of flax (Linum usitatissimum) and early growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and barley (Hordeum vulgare) were increased by irradiation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–583 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation increased early barley growth.

Treatment
irradiatione0
Outcome
early growthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early emergence of flax (Linum usitatissimum) and early growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and barley (Hordeum vulgare) were increased by irradiation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–583 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The early growth and emergence responses did not vary with photon energy or source dose rate.

Taxon
FIELD CROPSt0
Treatment
photon-energy or dose-ratee0
Outcome
These effectse0
Direction
did not varye0

Verbatim

e0

“These effects did not vary as a function of the photon-energy or dose-rate of the sources.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–674 · show in text ↑
t0

“FIELD CROPS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early wheat emergence was significantly accelerated in 7 of 18 seed lots.

Treatment
GAMMA IRRADIATION OF THE SEEDt0
Outcome
Early emergencee0
Direction
acceleratede0
Value
7 of 18 seed lotse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early emergence was significantly accelerated in 7 of 18 seed lots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“GAMMA IRRADIATION OF THE SEED”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“seed lots of wheat were irradiated at doses of 0.5–50 Gy using Cobalt-60”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain yield significantly increased in five cases for Neepawa or Glenlea cultivars.

Material
Neepawa or Glenlea cultivarse0
Treatment
GAMMA IRRADIATION OF THE SEEDt0
Outcome
Grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
five casese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yields were significantly increased in five cases for Neepawa or Glenlea cultivars, but were significantly decreased in nine other cases.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1027 · show in text ↑
t0

“GAMMA IRRADIATION OF THE SEED”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“seed lots of wheat were irradiated at doses of 0.5–50 Gy using Cobalt-60”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain yield significantly decreased in nine other cases.

Treatment
GAMMA IRRADIATION OF THE SEEDt0
Outcome
Grain yieldse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
nine other casese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yields were significantly increased in five cases for Neepawa or Glenlea cultivars, but were significantly decreased in nine other cases.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1027 · show in text ↑
t0

“GAMMA IRRADIATION OF THE SEED”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“seed lots of wheat were irradiated at doses of 0.5–50 Gy using Cobalt-60”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–814 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The responses were not consistently related to seed lot characteristics, moisture manipulation or planting delay.

Treatment
manipulation of the seed moisture content prior to irradiatione0
Outcome
The effectse0
Direction
not consistently relatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects were not consistently related to measured seed lot characteristics, manipulation of the seed moisture content prior to irradiation, or the post-seeding environment as varied by delayed planting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1234 · show in text ↑
e1

“seed lots of wheat were irradiated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–776 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early hormetic effects did not persist as a yield benefit at harvest.

Outcome
yield a benefit at harveste0
Direction
did not persiste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these effects did not persist to yield a benefit at harvest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1381 · show in text ↑
e1

“seed lots of wheat were irradiated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–776 · show in text ↑

radiation · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

36 papers: 13 positive, 23 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

radiation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

39 papers: 23 positive, 16 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

radiation · growth · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

radiation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

89 papers: 35 positive, 54 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.