Paper · 1993 · Agronomy Journal

Nitrogen Fertilization of Cotton Cultivars of Differing Maturity

J. Scott McConnell; William H. Baker; David M. Miller; et al.

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
53
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Management of N nutrition of cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) is one of the most critical aspects of successful cotton production, but growth and yield responses of individual cotton cultivars to N fertilization is relatively unknown. The objective of this research was to evaluate the responses of three cotton cultivars (Arkot 518, Stoneville 453, and Deltapine 90) to soil‐applied N fertilization rates. The study was conducted for 3 yr on a Hebert silt loam soil (fine‐silty, mixed, thermic Aeric Ochraqualf). Few significant (ɑ = 0.05) cultivar × N rate interaction differences were found, although main effects of the N treatments and the cultivars were evident. The most pronounced responses of the cotton were found as an effect of the N‐fertilization treatments. Nitrogen rates in excess of 112 kg N ha −1 did not significantly increase seed cotton yields in any year of the study. The mean yield of the cultivars among N rates was significantly different in only one year of the study. Earliness of the cotton was reduced by increasing N rate, as indicated by significant differences in nodes above white flower (NAWF) measurements. Significant differences were also found in the NAWF measurements for the cultivars, thereby inferring maturity differences among the cultivars tested. Of the cultivars evaluated, Arkot 518 was earliest, followed by Stoneville 453, and then Deltapine 90. Significant interactions of cultivar and N rate were found only in three dates of NAWF (1991), and one date of petiole NO ‐ 3 ‐N content (1990). Soil samples taken after 3 yr of continuous fertilization treatments showed a significant NO ‐ 3 ‐N accumulation at the 15‐ to 45‐cm depth only in plots treated with 224 kg N ha −1 .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Few cultivar by nitrogen rate interaction differences were significant.

Outcome
cultivar × N rate interaction differencese0
Qualifier
Few significante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Few significant (ɑ = 0.05) cultivar × N rate interaction differences were found, although main effects of the N treatments and the cultivars were evident.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–676 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen rates above 112 kg N ha −1 did not significantly increase seed cotton yield in any study year.

Treatment
Nitrogen rates in excess of 112 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
seed cotton yieldse0
Direction
did not significantly increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen rates in excess of 112 kg N ha −1 did not significantly increase seed cotton yields in any year of the study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–898 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean cultivar yield differed significantly among cultivars in only one study year.

Outcome
mean yielde0
Qualifier
only one year of the studye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean yield of the cultivars among N rates was significantly different in only one year of the study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1003 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen rate reduced cotton earliness as indicated by nodes above white flower.

Treatment
increasing N ratee0
Outcome
Earlinesse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
nodes above white flower (NAWF)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Earliness of the cotton was reduced by increasing N rate, as indicated by significant differences in nodes above white flower (NAWF) measurements.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1150 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars differed significantly in nodes above white flower.

Outcome
NAWF measurementse0
Qualifier
maturity differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant differences were also found in the NAWF measurements for the cultivars, thereby inferring maturity differences among the cultivars tested.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1301 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arkot 518 was the earliest cotton cultivar, followed by Stoneville 453 and Deltapine 90.

Material
Arkot 518e0
Outcome
earlieste0
Direction
earlieste0
Qualifier
Deltapine 90e0
Comparator
Stoneville 453e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Of the cultivars evaluated, Arkot 518 was earliest, followed by Stoneville 453, and then Deltapine 90.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1404 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar and nitrogen rate interacted significantly for nodes above white flower on three dates in 1991.

Outcome
NAWFe0
Value
three datese0
Qualifier
1991e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant interactions of cultivar and N rate were found only in three dates of NAWF (1991), and one date of petiole NO ‐ 3 ‐N content (1990).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1549 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar and nitrogen rate interacted significantly for petiole nitrate nitrogen content on one date in 1990.

Outcome
petiole NO ‐ 3 ‐N contente0
Value
one datee0
Qualifier
1990e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant interactions of cultivar and N rate were found only in three dates of NAWF (1991), and one date of petiole NO ‐ 3 ‐N content (1990).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1549 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Only plots receiving 224 kg N ha −1 had significant soil nitrate accumulation at 15 to 45 cm after three years.

Treatment
224 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
NO ‐ 3 ‐N accumulatione0
Direction
accumulatione0
Qualifier
15‐ to 45‐cm depthe0

Not reportedTaxonOrgan / stageComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Soil samples taken after 3 yr of continuous fertilization treatments showed a significant NO ‐ 3 ‐N accumulation at the 15‐ to 45‐cm depth only in plots treated with 224 kg N ha −1 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1550–1732 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · phenology · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 7 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

343 papers: 286 positive, 57 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 286 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

339 papers more in this group

See all 343 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.