Paper · 1986 · Journal of Environmental Quality

Nitrate Leaching Through Sandy Soil as Affected by Sprinkler Irrigation Management

Gary W. Hergert

13
claims
27
verbatim quotes
78
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Nitrate‐N (NO 3 ) leaching losses were quantified for irrigated corn ( Zea mays L.) grown on a Valentine sand using a ceramic candle extraction system buried at 1.5‐m depth. Irrigation rates were 85% and 130% of evapotranspiration (ET). Total dry matter, grain yield and crop N uptake were not significantly affected by irrigation level. During the two year study average annual flow‐weighted NO 3 ‐N concentrations in extracted soil water ranged from 28.3 to 75.2 mg NO 3 ‐N L −1 for 0.85 and 1.3 ET irrigation levels, respectively. In 1976 the 0.85 ET treatment had 37 ha‐mm of soil water percolation and leaching of 12 kg NO 3 ‐N. The 1.3 ET treatment lost 191 ha‐mm of percolation and 75 kg NO 3 ‐N. In 1977 132 ha‐mm of soil water was lost by percolation and 109 kg NO 3 ‐N ha −1 for 0.85 ET and 182 ha‐mm and 146 kg NO 3 ‐N ha −1 for the 1.3 ET irrigation level. The higher soil water percolation and NO 3 ‐N losses in 1977 resulted from over‐winter precipitation and early spring leaching of the previous year's residual nitrate. In‐season NO 3 ‐N leaching was reduced by matching irrigation to ET. To effectively reduce NO 3 ‐N leaching N fertilizer rates must match crop yield requirements to reduce soil NO 3 ‐N carryover and irrigation scheduling must be used on sands.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn dry matter, grain yield and nitrogen uptake did not differ significantly by irrigation level.

Treatment
85%e1
Outcome
Total dry matter, grain yield and crop N uptakee0
Comparator
130%e1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total dry matter, grain yield and crop N uptake were not significantly affected by irrigation level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 246–346 · show in text ↑
e1

“Irrigation rates were 85% and 130% of evapotranspiration (ET).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–245 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher irrigation level had a higher annual flow-weighted nitrate concentration in extracted soil water.

Treatment
1.3 ETe0
Outcome
NO 3 ‐N concentrations in extracted soil watere0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
75.2 mg NO 3 ‐N L −1e0
Qualifier
28.3e0
Comparator
0.85e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“average annual flow‐weighted NO 3 ‐N concentrations in extracted soil water ranged from 28.3 to 75.2 mg NO 3 ‐N L −1 for 0.85 and 1.3 ET irrigation levels, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–542 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1976, 0.85 ET irrigation produced 37 ha-mm of soil water percolation.

Treatment
0.85 ETe0
Outcome
soil water percolatione0
Value
37 ha‐mme0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1976 the 0.85 ET treatment had 37 ha‐mm of soil water percolation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–611 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1976, 0.85 ET irrigation had 12 kg nitrate nitrogen leaching.

Treatment
0.85 ETe0
Outcome
leachinge0
Value
12 kg NO 3 ‐Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1976 the 0.85 ET treatment had 37 ha‐mm of soil water percolation and leaching of 12 kg NO 3 ‐N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–642 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1976, 1.3 ET irrigation produced 191 ha-mm percolation.

Treatment
1.3 ETe0
Outcome
percolatione0
Value
191 ha‐mme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 1.3 ET treatment lost 191 ha‐mm of percolation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–693 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1976, 1.3 ET irrigation lost 75 kg nitrate nitrogen.

Treatment
1.3 ETe0
Outcome
NO 3 ‐Ne0
Value
75 kg NO 3 ‐Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 1.3 ET treatment lost 191 ha‐mm of percolation and 75 kg NO 3 ‐N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–712 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1977, 0.85 ET irrigation lost 132 ha-mm soil water by percolation.

Treatment
0.85 ETe0
Outcome
soil water was lost by percolatione0
Value
132 ha‐mme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1977 132 ha‐mm of soil water was lost by percolation and 109 kg NO 3 ‐N ha −1 for 0.85 ET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–805 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1977, 0.85 ET irrigation lost 109 kg nitrate nitrogen per hectare.

Treatment
0.85 ETe0
Outcome
NO 3 ‐Ne0
Value
109 kg NO 3 ‐N ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1977 132 ha‐mm of soil water was lost by percolation and 109 kg NO 3 ‐N ha −1 for 0.85 ET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–805 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1977, 1.3 ET irrigation lost 182 ha-mm soil water by percolation.

Treatment
1.3 ETe0
Outcome
percolatione0
Value
182 ha‐mme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1977 132 ha‐mm of soil water was lost by percolation and 109 kg NO 3 ‐N ha −1 for 0.85 ET and 182 ha‐mm and 146 kg NO 3 ‐N ha −1 for the 1.3 ET irrigation level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–876 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1977, 1.3 ET irrigation lost 146 kg nitrate nitrogen per hectare.

Treatment
1.3 ETe0
Outcome
NO 3 ‐Ne0
Value
146 kg NO 3 ‐N ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“182 ha‐mm and 146 kg NO 3 ‐N ha −1 for the 1.3 ET irrigation level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–876 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–92 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater percolation and nitrate loss in 1977 were attributed to winter precipitation and spring leaching of residual nitrate.

Outcome
soil water percolation and NO 3 ‐N lossese0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
over‐winter precipitation and early spring leachinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The higher soil water percolation and NO 3 ‐N losses in 1977 resulted from over‐winter precipitation and early spring leaching of the previous year's residual nitrate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1045 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Matching irrigation to evapotranspiration reduced in-season nitrate leaching.

Treatment
matching irrigation to ETe0
Outcome
In‐season NO 3 ‐N leachinge0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In‐season NO 3 ‐N leaching was reduced by matching irrigation to ET.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1114 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–92 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend matching nitrogen fertilizer to yield requirements and scheduling irrigation on sands to reduce nitrate leaching.

Outcome
N fertilizer rates must match crop yield requirements to reduce soil NO 3 ‐N carryover and irrigation scheduling must be used on sandse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To effectively reduce NO 3 ‐N leaching N fertilizer rates must match crop yield requirements to reduce soil NO 3 ‐N carryover and irrigation scheduling must be used on sands.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1289 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–92 · show in text ↑

irrigation · environment: emissions · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.