Abstract
Abstract Results of a field experiment, comprising a control, two micronutrient preparations, two phosphate fertilizers, singly and in combination, with and without sulphur, showed that only the application of sulphur was effective in preventing the occurrence of chlorosis. The application of 250 kg/ha sulphur increased the grain yield of peas 100%. The chlorotic leaves contained 40% more Fe, 10% more Al, and 31% more Si but 10, 17, 10, 11, and 25% less N, K, S, Mg, and B, respectively, than green leaves. Differences in grain yield and leaf composition (except for sulphur) were statistically significant. Micronutrient treatments did not affect the yield of the crop but had significant effect on leaf contents of N, Na, Fe, Mn, Mo, and Al. Phosphate fertilizers slightly increased the grain yield but had no effect on leaf composition.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
Only sulphur application prevented chlorosis.
- Taxon
- Peas
Lathyrus oleraceust0 - Treatment
- application of sulphure0
- Outcome
- occurrence of chlorosise0
- Direction
- preventinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“only the application of sulphur was effective in preventing the occurrence of chlorosis”
t0“Peas”
Claim · model-written summary
Applying 250 kg/ha sulphur doubled pea grain yield.
- Taxon
- peasLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- 250 kg/ha sulphure0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 100%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The application of 250 kg/ha sulphur increased the grain yield of peas 100%”
e1“Differences in grain yield and leaf composition (except for sulphur) were statistically significant.”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorotic leaves contained 40% more Fe than green leaves.
- Taxon
- PeasLathyrus oleraceust0
- Organ / stage
- chlorotic leavese0
- Outcome
- Fee0
- Direction
- moree0
- Value
- 40%e0
- Comparator
- green leavese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The chlorotic leaves contained 40% more Fe, 10% more Al, and 31% more Si but 10, 17, 10, 11, and 25% less N, K, S, Mg, and B, respectively, than green leaves.”
e1“Differences in grain yield and leaf composition (except for sulphur) were statistically significant.”
t0“Peas”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorotic leaves contained 10% more Al than green leaves.
- Taxon
- PeasLathyrus oleraceust0
- Organ / stage
- chlorotic leavese0
- Outcome
- Ale0
- Direction
- moree0
- Value
- 10%e0
- Comparator
- green leavese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The chlorotic leaves contained 40% more Fe, 10% more Al, and 31% more Si but 10, 17, 10, 11, and 25% less N, K, S, Mg, and B, respectively, than green leaves.”
e1“Differences in grain yield and leaf composition (except for sulphur) were statistically significant.”
t0“Peas”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorotic leaves contained 31% more Si than green leaves.
- Taxon
- PeasLathyrus oleraceust0
- Organ / stage
- chlorotic leavese0
- Outcome
- Sie0
- Direction
- moree0
- Value
- 31%e0
- Comparator
- green leavese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The chlorotic leaves contained 40% more Fe, 10% more Al, and 31% more Si but 10, 17, 10, 11, and 25% less N, K, S, Mg, and B, respectively, than green leaves.”
e1“Differences in grain yield and leaf composition (except for sulphur) were statistically significant.”
t0“Peas”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorotic leaves contained 10% less N than green leaves.
- Taxon
- PeasLathyrus oleraceust0
- Organ / stage
- chlorotic leavese0
- Outcome
- Ne0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Value
- 10%e0
- Comparator
- green leavese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The chlorotic leaves contained 40% more Fe, 10% more Al, and 31% more Si but 10, 17, 10, 11, and 25% less N, K, S, Mg, and B, respectively, than green leaves.”
e1“Differences in grain yield and leaf composition (except for sulphur) were statistically significant.”
t0“Peas”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorotic leaves contained 17% less K than green leaves.
- Taxon
- PeasLathyrus oleraceust0
- Organ / stage
- chlorotic leavese0
- Outcome
- Ke0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Value
- 17e0
- Comparator
- green leavese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The chlorotic leaves contained 40% more Fe, 10% more Al, and 31% more Si but 10, 17, 10, 11, and 25% less N, K, S, Mg, and B, respectively, than green leaves.”
e1“Differences in grain yield and leaf composition (except for sulphur) were statistically significant.”
t0“Peas”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorotic leaves contained 10% less S than green leaves.
- Taxon
- PeasLathyrus oleraceust0
- Organ / stage
- chlorotic leavese0
- Outcome
- Se0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Value
- 10%e0
- Comparator
- green leavese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The chlorotic leaves contained 40% more Fe, 10% more Al, and 31% more Si but 10, 17, 10, 11, and 25% less N, K, S, Mg, and B, respectively, than green leaves.”
e1“Differences in grain yield and leaf composition (except for sulphur) were statistically significant.”
t0“Peas”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorotic leaves contained 11% less Mg than green leaves.
- Taxon
- PeasLathyrus oleraceust0
- Organ / stage
- chlorotic leavese0
- Outcome
- Mge0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Value
- 11e0
- Comparator
- green leavese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The chlorotic leaves contained 40% more Fe, 10% more Al, and 31% more Si but 10, 17, 10, 11, and 25% less N, K, S, Mg, and B, respectively, than green leaves.”
e1“Differences in grain yield and leaf composition (except for sulphur) were statistically significant.”
t0“Peas”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorotic leaves contained 25% less B than green leaves.
- Taxon
- PeasLathyrus oleraceust0
- Organ / stage
- chlorotic leavese0
- Outcome
- Be0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Value
- 25%e0
- Comparator
- green leavese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The chlorotic leaves contained 40% more Fe, 10% more Al, and 31% more Si but 10, 17, 10, 11, and 25% less N, K, S, Mg, and B, respectively, than green leaves.”
e1“Differences in grain yield and leaf composition (except for sulphur) were statistically significant.”
t0“Peas”
Claim · model-written summary
Micronutrient treatments did not affect crop yield.
- Taxon
- PeasLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- Micronutrient treatmentse0
- Outcome
- yield of the crope0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Micronutrient treatments did not affect the yield of the crop”
t0“Peas”
Claim · model-written summary
Micronutrient treatments significantly affected leaf N, Na and Fe contents.
- Taxon
- PeasLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- Micronutrient treatmentse0
- Outcome
- leaf contents of N, Na, Fee0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Micronutrient treatments did not affect the yield of the crop but had significant effect on leaf contents of N, Na, Fe, Mn, Mo, and Al.”
t0“Peas”
Claim · model-written summary
Micronutrient treatments significantly affected leaf Mn, Mo and Al contents.
- Taxon
- PeasLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- Micronutrient treatmentse0
- Outcome
- Mn, Mo, and Ale0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Micronutrient treatments did not affect the yield of the crop but had significant effect on leaf contents of N, Na, Fe, Mn, Mo, and Al.”
t0“Peas”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphate fertilizers slightly increased grain yield.
- Taxon
- PeasLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- Phosphate fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- slightlye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Phosphate fertilizers slightly increased the grain yield”
t0“Peas”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphate fertilizers had no effect on leaf composition.
- Taxon
- PeasLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- Phosphate fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- leaf compositione0
- Direction
- no effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Phosphate fertilizers slightly increased the grain yield but had no effect on leaf composition”
t0“Peas”
The same questions in other papers
phosphate · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
sulfur atom · physiology: pigments · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
sulfur atom · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree
12 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →fertilization · quality: general · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →micronutrient · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →fertilization · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
215 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
236 papers more in this group
See all 240 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.