Paper · 2020 · Scientific Reports

Response of wheat, pea, and canola to micronutrient fertilization on five contrasting prairie soils

Noabur Rahman; Jeff Schoenau

9
claims
13
verbatim quotes
29
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A polyhouse study was conducted to evaluate the relative effectiveness of different micronutrient fertilizer formulation and application methods on wheat, pea and canola, as indicated by yield response and fate of micronutrients in contrasting mineral soils. The underlying factors controlling micronutrient bioavailability in a soil-plant system were examined using chemical and spectroscopic speciation techniques. Application of Cu significantly improved grain and straw biomass yields of wheat on two of the five soils (Ukalta and Sceptre), of which the Ukalta soil was critically Cu deficient according to soil extraction with DTPA. The deficiency problem was corrected by either soil or foliar application of Cu fertilizers. There were no significant yield responses of pea to Zn fertilization on any of the five soils. For canola, soil placement of boric acid was effective in correcting the deficiency problem in Whitefox soil, while foliar application was not. Soil extractable Cu, Zn, and B concentration in post-harvest soils were increased with soil placement of fertilizers, indicating that following crops in rotation could benefit from this application method. The chemical and XANES spectroscopic speciation indicates that carbonate associated is the dominant form of Cu and Zn in prairie soils, where chemisorption to carbonates is likely the major process that determines the fate of added Cu and Zn fertilizer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cu application significantly improved wheat grain and straw biomass yields on Ukalta and Sceptre soils.

Treatment
Application of Cue0
Outcome
grain and straw biomass yieldse0
Direction
improvede0
Setting
Ukalta and Sceptree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of Cu significantly improved grain and straw biomass yields of wheat on two of the five soils (Ukalta and Sceptre), of which the Ukalta soil was critically Cu deficient according to soil extraction with DTPA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–637 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ukalta soil was critically Cu deficient by DTPA extraction.

Outcome
Ukalta soil was critically Cu deficiente0
Setting
Ukaltae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of Cu significantly improved grain and straw biomass yields of wheat on two of the five soils (Ukalta and Sceptre), of which the Ukalta soil was critically Cu deficient according to soil extraction with DTPA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–637 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both soil and foliar Cu fertilizers corrected the deficiency in wheat.

Treatment
soil or foliar application of Cu fertilizerse0
Outcome
deficiency probleme0
Direction
correctede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The deficiency problem was corrected by either soil or foliar application of Cu fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–730 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat, pea, and canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pea yield did not respond significantly to Zn fertilization on any of five soils.

Treatment
Zn fertilizatione0
Outcome
yield responsese0
Direction
no significant yield responsese0
Qualifier
any of the five soilse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no significant yield responses of pea to Zn fertilization on any of the five soils.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–825 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil placement of boric acid corrected the deficiency in canola on Whitefox soil.

Treatment
soil placement of boric acide0
Outcome
deficiency probleme0
Direction
correctinge0
Comparator
foliar applicatione0
Setting
Whitefox soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For canola, soil placement of boric acid was effective in correcting the deficiency problem in Whitefox soil, while foliar application was not.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–969 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar boric acid application did not correct the canola deficiency on Whitefox soil.

Treatment
foliar applicatione0
Outcome
deficiency probleme0
Direction
was note0
Comparator
soil placement of boric acide0
Setting
Whitefox soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For canola, soil placement of boric acid was effective in correcting the deficiency problem in Whitefox soil, while foliar application was not.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–969 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil fertilizer placement increased post-harvest extractable Cu, Zn and B in soils.

Treatment
soil placement of fertilizerse0
Outcome
Soil extractable Cu, Zn, and B concentratione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil extractable Cu, Zn, and B concentration in post-harvest soils were increased with soil placement of fertilizers, indicating that following crops in rotation could benefit from this application method.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1175 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat, pea, and canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–34 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbonate-associated forms dominated Cu and Zn speciation in prairie soils.

Outcome
carbonate associated is the dominant form of Cu and Zne0
Setting
prairie soilse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The chemical and XANES spectroscopic speciation indicates that carbonate associated is the dominant form of Cu and Zn in prairie soils, where chemisorption to carbonates is likely the major process that determines the fate of added Cu and Zn fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1429 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat, pea, and canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–34 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that chemisorption to carbonates likely governs added Cu and Zn fertilizer fate in prairie soils.

Outcome
fate of added Cu and Zn fertilizere0
Qualifier
chemisorption to carbonates is likely the major processe0
Setting
prairie soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The chemical and XANES spectroscopic speciation indicates that carbonate associated is the dominant form of Cu and Zn in prairie soils, where chemisorption to carbonates is likely the major process that determines the fate of added Cu and Zn fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1429 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat, pea, and canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–34 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

26 papers: 24 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

copper atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

75 papers: 63 positive, 12 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

fertilization · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

240 papers: 216 positive, 24 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 216 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

236 papers more in this group

See all 240 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.