Paper · 1987 · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture

Response of apple trees to soil applications of phosphorus, nitrogen and potassium

JEL Cripps

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
9
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted at Manjimup Research Station in Western Australia from 1973 to 1982 to determine the optimum rates of fertilizer applications for apple trees (Granny Smith/MM.104 and Hi Early Red Delicious/MM.104) growing in a P-deficient soil (about 6 mg/g bicarbonate-extractable P). The trees were planted at 6.1 multiply 6.1 m spacings. Superphosphate at 5 or 8 kg/tree consistently increased fruit set, but the increase varied from year to year from 8 to 91%. Weight of prunings increased by 24-29% and tree height multiply width by 11-16%. When results were averaged over both cultivars, weight of fruits harvested from 1973 to 1982 was increased from 853 to 1226 kg/tree by superphosphate application at 5 kg/tree. Ammonium nitrate applied at up to 4 kg/tree gave small non-significant increases in growth and no increase in weight of fruits harvested for Granny Smith, but the weight of the Red Delicious crop rose by 11%. No response to potassium chloride at 1 kg/tree was found. P fertilizer application increased P concentration in the first fully mature leaves of Granny Smith trees from approximately 0.14% to 0.17-0.19% and in Red Delicious leaves from 0.17 to 0.20-0.21%. N fertilizer application increased N concentration in Granny Smith leaves from approximately 2.3 to 2.5%. Lack of P was the main limiting factor on growth and cropping and it is suggested that the importance of P nutrition in Western Australian apple orchards has been underestimated.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Superphosphate increased fruit set by 8 to 91%.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
Superphosphate at 5 or 8 kg/treee0
Outcome
fruit sete0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8 to 91%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Superphosphate at 5 or 8 kg/tree consistently increased fruit set, but the increase varied from year to year from 8 to 91%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–476 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Superphosphate increased pruning weight by 24-29%.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Outcome
Weight of pruningse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
24-29%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weight of prunings increased by 24-29%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–515 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Superphosphate increased tree height times width by 11-16%.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Outcome
tree height multiply widthe0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
11-16%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tree height multiply width by 11-16%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–557 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Superphosphate increased harvested fruit weight from 853 to 1226 kg/tree.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
superphosphate application at 5 kg/treee0
Outcome
weight of fruits harvestede0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1226 kg/treee0
Qualifier
853e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weight of fruits harvested from 1973 to 1982 was increased from 853 to 1226 kg/tree by superphosphate application at 5 kg/tree.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–733 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nitrate caused small nonsignificant growth increases in Granny Smith.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Material
Granny Smithe0
Treatment
Ammonium nitrate applied at up to 4 kg/treee0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ammonium nitrate applied at up to 4 kg/tree gave small non-significant increases in growth and no increase in weight of fruits harvested for Granny Smith”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–887 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nitrate did not increase Granny Smith harvested fruit weight.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Material
Granny Smithe0
Treatment
Ammonium nitrate applied at up to 4 kg/treee0
Outcome
weight of fruits harvestede0
Direction
no increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ammonium nitrate applied at up to 4 kg/tree gave small non-significant increases in growth and no increase in weight of fruits harvested for Granny Smith”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–887 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nitrate raised Red Delicious crop weight by 11%.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Material
Red Deliciouse0
Outcome
weight of the Red Delicious crope0
Direction
rosee0
Value
11%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the weight of the Red Delicious crop rose by 11%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–942 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium chloride gave no response.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
potassium chloride at 1 kg/treee0
Outcome
No responsee0
Direction
No responsee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No response to potassium chloride at 1 kg/tree was found.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1000 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P fertilizer increased Granny Smith leaf P concentration to 0.17-0.19%.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Material
Granny Smithe0
Organ / stage
first fully mature leavese0
Treatment
P fertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
P concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.17-0.19%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P fertilizer application increased P concentration in the first fully mature leaves of Granny Smith trees from approximately 0.14% to 0.17-0.19%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1145 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P fertilizer increased Red Delicious leaf P concentration to 0.20-0.21%.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Material
Red Deliciouse0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
P fertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
P concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.20-0.21%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P fertilizer application increased P concentration in the first fully mature leaves of Granny Smith trees from approximately 0.14% to 0.17-0.19% and in Red Delicious leaves from 0.17 to 0.20-0.21%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1198 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N fertilizer increased Granny Smith leaf N concentration to 2.5%.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Material
Granny Smithe0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
N fertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
N concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N fertilizer application increased N concentration in Granny Smith leaves from approximately 2.3 to 2.5%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1304 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–23 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identified P deficiency as the main limit on apple growth and cropping.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Outcome
growth and croppinge0
Qualifier
Lack of Pe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lack of P was the main limiting factor on growth and cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1305–1366 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–23 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

117 papers: 86 positive, 31 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

113 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.