Paper · 1988 · New Phytologist

Effects of open‐air fumigation with sulphur dioxide on the growth and yield of winter barley

A. R. McLEOD; T. M. ROBERTS; K. ALEXANDER; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
24
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

summary An open‐air fumigation system was used to expose a winter barley crop ( Hordeum vulgare L.) to controlled concentrations of SO 2 from November 1982 to July 1983. Monitoring data from a rural site were used as a basis for simulating mean concentrations of 0.023, 0.038 and 0.058 μl 1 −1 SO 2 at a location where background concentrations were 0.01μl 1 −1 SO 2 . There was no evidence of a reduction or stimulation of crop growth over the winter period. During the spring, the crop in SO 2 fumigated plots had a higher green leaf area and dry weight than in control plots which may have resulted from a reduction in the occurrence of the fungal pathogen brown rust ( Puccinia Hordei Otth.). After car emergence a delay in senescence of leaves was observed in fumigated plots which gave the plants an extended period for assimilation during grain filling. There was no evidence that the yield of barley was reduced within the range of ambient SO 2 concentration in the UK (annual mean 0.03μ1 l −1 SO 2 ). However, at 0.058μl 1 −1 SO 2 , reductions in yield were observed. Treatment with 0.023μl 1 −1 SO 2 produced increased grain yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SO2 fumigation had no observed effect on winter crop growth.

Taxon
winter barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Outcome
crop growthe0
Direction
no evidence of a reduction or stimulatione0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no evidence of a reduction or stimulation of crop growth over the winter period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–459 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring fumigated plots had higher green leaf area and dry weight than controls.

Taxon
winter barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
SO 2 fumigated plotse0
Outcome
green leaf area and dry weighte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the spring, the crop in SO 2 fumigated plots had a higher green leaf area and dry weight than in control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–577 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fumigated plots showed delayed leaf senescence after ear emergence.

Taxon
winter barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
fumigated plotse0
Outcome
senescence of leavese0
Direction
delaye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After car emergence a delay in senescence of leaves was observed in fumigated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–780 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley yield was not reduced across ambient UK SO2 concentrations.

Treatment
ambient SO 2 concentratione0
Outcome
yield of barleye0
Direction
no evidence that the yield of barley was reducede0
Setting
UKe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no evidence that the yield of barley was reduced within the range of ambient SO 2 concentration in the UK (annual mean 0.03μ1 l −1 SO 2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–1008 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SO2 at 0.058 μl 1 −1 reduced yield.

Taxon
winter barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
0.058μl 1 −1 SO 2e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at 0.058μl 1 −1 SO 2 , reductions in yield were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1075 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SO2 at 0.023 μl 1 −1 increased grain yield.

Taxon
winter barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
0.023μl 1 −1 SO 2e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment with 0.023μl 1 −1 SO 2 produced increased grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1141 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–92 · show in text ↑

pollution · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

solarization · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

pollution · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.