Abstract
Synopsis No differences were found in total nitrogen content of vegetative parts of high and low protein wheat varieties prior to heading. After heading nitrogen increased more rapidly in the heads of high protein varieties. Varietal differences in protein content of the kernels were not decreased by growing plants in solution culture, or by foliar applications of urea or nitrate nitrogen.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Before heading, high and low protein wheat varieties had no difference in vegetative total nitrogen.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Material
- high and low protein wheat varietiese0
- Organ / stage
- vegetative partse0
- Outcome
- total nitrogen contente0
- Direction
- No differencese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“No differences were found in total nitrogen content of vegetative parts of high and low protein wheat varieties prior to heading”
Claim · model-written summary
After heading, head nitrogen increased faster in high protein varieties.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- high protein varietiese0
- Organ / stage
- headse0
- Outcome
- nitrogene0
- Direction
- increased more rapidlye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“After heading nitrogen increased more rapidly in the heads of high protein varieties”
t0“Wheat Varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
Solution culture did not decrease varietal differences in kernel protein content.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- growing plants in solution culturee0
- Outcome
- Varietal differences in protein content of the kernelse0
- Direction
- not decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Varietal differences in protein content of the kernels were not decreased by growing plants in solution culture”
t0“Wheat Varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar urea did not decrease varietal differences in kernel protein content.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- foliar applications of ureae0
- Outcome
- Varietal differences in protein content of the kernelse0
- Direction
- not decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Varietal differences in protein content of the kernels were not decreased by growing plants in solution culture, or by foliar applications of urea or nitrate nitrogen”
t0“Wheat Varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar nitrate nitrogen did not decrease varietal differences in kernel protein content.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- nitrate nitrogene0
- Outcome
- Varietal differences in protein content of the kernelse0
- Direction
- not decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Varietal differences in protein content of the kernels were not decreased by growing plants in solution culture, or by foliar applications of urea or nitrate nitrogen”
t0“Wheat Varieties”
The same questions in other papers
application · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 110 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
121 papers more in this group
See all 125 papers →nitrogen · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 400 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
450 papers more in this group
See all 454 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.