Paper · 2001 · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Postharvest Treatments for the Reduction of Mancozeb in Fresh Apples

Eun-Sun Hwang; Jerry N. Cash; Matthew J. Zabik

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
101
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of chlorine, chlorine dioxide, ozone, and hydrogen peroxyacetic acid (HPA) treatments on the degradation of mancozeb and ethylenethiourea (ETU) in apples. This study was based on model experiments at neutral pH and temperature. Fresh apples were treated with two different levels of mancozeb (1 and 10 microg/mL). Several of the treatments were effective in reducing or removing mancozeb and ETU residues on spiked apples. Mancozeb residues decreased 56-99% with chlorine and 36-87% with chlorine dioxide treatments. ETU was completely degraded by 500 ppm of calcium hypochlorite and 10 ppm of chlorine dioxide at a 1 ppm spike level. However, at a 10 ppm spike level, the effectiveness of ETU degradation was lower than observed at 1 ppm level. Mancozeb residues decreased 56-97% with ozone treatment. At 1 and 3 ppm of ozone, no ETU residue was detected at 1 ppm of spiked mancozeb after both 3 and 30 min. HPA was also effective in degrading the mancozeb residues, with 44-99% reduction depending on treatment time and HPA concentrations. ETU was completely degraded at 500 ppm of HPA after 30 min of reaction time. These treatments indicated good potential for the removal of pesticide residues on fruit and in processed products.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorine decreased mancozeb residues by 56-99%.

Treatment
chlorinee0
Outcome
Mancozeb residuese0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
56-99%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mancozeb residues decreased 56-99% with chlorine and 36-87% with chlorine dioxide treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–579 · show in text ↑
e1

“in apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–216 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorine dioxide decreased mancozeb residues by 36-87%.

Treatment
chlorine dioxidee0
Outcome
Mancozeb residuese0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
36-87%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mancozeb residues decreased 56-99% with chlorine and 36-87% with chlorine dioxide treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–579 · show in text ↑
e1

“in apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–216 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium hypochlorite completely degraded ETU at the 1 ppm spike level.

Treatment
500 ppm of calcium hypochloritee0
Outcome
ETUe0
Direction
completely degradede0
Qualifier
at a 1 ppm spike levele0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ETU was completely degraded by 500 ppm of calcium hypochlorite and 10 ppm of chlorine dioxide at a 1 ppm spike level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–697 · show in text ↑
e1

“in apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–216 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorine dioxide completely degraded ETU at the 1 ppm spike level.

Treatment
10 ppm of chlorine dioxidee0
Outcome
ETUe0
Direction
completely degradede0
Qualifier
at a 1 ppm spike levele0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ETU was completely degraded by 500 ppm of calcium hypochlorite and 10 ppm of chlorine dioxide at a 1 ppm spike level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–697 · show in text ↑
e1

“in apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–216 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ETU degradation effectiveness was lower at a 10 ppm spike level than at 1 ppm.

Outcome
effectiveness of ETU degradatione0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
1 ppm levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at a 10 ppm spike level, the effectiveness of ETU degradation was lower than observed at 1 ppm level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–808 · show in text ↑
e1

“in apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–216 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone decreased mancozeb residues by 56-97%.

Treatment
ozone treatmente0
Outcome
Mancozeb residuese0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
56-97%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mancozeb residues decreased 56-97% with ozone treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–865 · show in text ↑
e1

“in apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–216 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No ETU residue was detected after 1 ppm ozone treatment under the stated conditions.

Treatment
ozonee0
Outcome
no ETU residue was detectede0
Qualifier
At 1 and 3 ppm of ozonee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 1 and 3 ppm of ozone, no ETU residue was detected at 1 ppm of spiked mancozeb after both 3 and 30 min.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–971 · show in text ↑
e1

“in apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–216 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No ETU residue was detected after 3 ppm ozone treatment under the stated conditions.

Treatment
3 ppm of ozonee0
Outcome
no ETU residue was detectede0
Qualifier
at 1 ppm of spiked mancozeb after both 3 and 30 mine0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 1 and 3 ppm of ozone, no ETU residue was detected at 1 ppm of spiked mancozeb after both 3 and 30 min.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–971 · show in text ↑
e1

“in apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–216 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HPA reduced mancozeb residues by 44-99%.

Treatment
HPAe0
Outcome
mancozeb residuese0
Direction
reductione0
Value
44-99%e0
Qualifier
depending on treatment time and HPA concentrationse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HPA was also effective in degrading the mancozeb residues, with 44-99% reduction depending on treatment time and HPA concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1104 · show in text ↑
e1

“in apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–216 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HPA completely degraded ETU after 30 minutes.

Treatment
500 ppm of HPAe0
Outcome
ETUe0
Direction
completely degradede0
Qualifier
after 30 min of reaction timee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ETU was completely degraded at 500 ppm of HPA after 30 min of reaction time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1181 · show in text ↑
e1

“in apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–216 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors judged these treatments promising for pesticide residue removal from fruit and processed products.

Outcome
removal of pesticide residues on fruit and in processed productse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These treatments indicated good potential for the removal of pesticide residues on fruit and in processed products.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1297 · show in text ↑
e1

“in apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–216 · show in text ↑

dichlorine · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

ozone · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.