Abstract
The objective of this study was to determine the effects in the yield of soybean crop utilizing a trailing boom sprayer for chemical control of late season diseases. The experimental design was randomized blocks with 04 treatments, which consisted of applying fungicides with a traditional sprayer, trailing boom, the traditional sprayer plus the trailing boom simultaneously and control (without fungicide aerial application) in 05 repetitions per treatment. The variables evaluated were: final plant population, pods per plant, grains per pod, weight of one thousand grains and yield. It was concluded that the control of foliar diseases with fungicides presented weight of one thousand grains and yield significantly higher than the average of plots without fungicide application. The trailing boom did not significantly affect the yield compared to the technology currently used.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 2
Claim · model-written summary
Fungicide control of foliar diseases in soybean raises the weight of one thousand grains and yield over untreated plots
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe2 - Treatment
- control of foliar diseases with fungicidese1
- Outcome
- weight of one thousand grains and yielde1
- Direction
- highere1
- Comparator
- plots without fungicide applicatione1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“the control of foliar diseases with fungicides presented weight of one thousand grains and yield significantly higher than the average of plots without fungicide application”
e2“effects in the yield of soybean crop”
Claim · model-written summary
A trailing boom sprayer does not significantly change soybean yield compared with the current application technology
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe2 - Treatment
- trailing boome1
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- did not significantly affecte1
- Comparator
- technology currently usede1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“The trailing boom did not significantly affect the yield compared to the technology currently used”
e2“effects in the yield of soybean crop”
The same questions in other papers
fungicide · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
76 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
105 papers more in this group
See all 109 papers →application · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
331 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
400 papers more in this group
See all 404 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.