Paper · 1971 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

Effect of Trickle Irrigation Intervals on Distribution and Utilization of Soil Moisture in a Vineyard

S. D. Goldberg; M. Rinot; N. Karu

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
40
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract In an established vineyard on sandy clay soil the effect of trickle irrigation interval on soil moisture and salt distribution and relative water use efficiency was examined. The distribution of soil moisture and salinity resulting from this irrigation method is two dimensional, with moisture contents high along and beneath the row and decreasing laterally. The main active soil layer supplying water to the roots was found to be restricted to a strip approximately 2 m wide and 120 cm deep beneath the rows, whereas the total distance between rows was 3 m. The effect of shorter irrigation intervals, with proportionally smaller amounts of water applied in a single irrigation, was to decrease the variations of moisture content in the root zone and establish a continuously higher moisture regime. Salts were concentrated in a surface pocket and a deep layer with a leached zone between them. The relative position of the concentration layers was determined by the amount of water applied in a single irrigation. Relative water use efficiency was positively affected by shorter irrigation intervals both in terms of grape ( Vitis vinifera L. ‘Tamar’) production and of weight of prunings.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trickle irrigation produced two-dimensional soil moisture and salinity distributions, with moisture high along and beneath vine rows and declining laterally.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L. ‘Tamar’Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
this irrigation methode0
Outcome
moisture contentse0
Direction
decreasing laterallye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The distribution of soil moisture and salinity resulting from this irrigation method is two dimensional, with moisture contents high along and beneath the row and decreasing laterally.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–368 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape ( Vitis vinifera L. ‘Tamar’) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1174 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The active soil layer supplying vine roots was a strip about 2 m wide and 120 cm deep beneath rows.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L. ‘Tamar’Vitis viniferat0
Outcome
main active soil layer supplying water to the rootse0
Value
approximately 2 m wide and 120 cm deepe0
Qualifier
total distance between rows was 3 me0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The main active soil layer supplying water to the roots was found to be restricted to a strip approximately 2 m wide and 120 cm deep beneath the rows, whereas the total distance between rows was 3 m.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–568 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape ( Vitis vinifera L. ‘Tamar’) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shorter irrigation intervals decreased variation in root-zone moisture.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L. ‘Tamar’Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
shorter irrigation intervalse0
Outcome
variations of moisture content in the root zonee0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of shorter irrigation intervals, with proportionally smaller amounts of water applied in a single irrigation, was to decrease the variations of moisture content in the root zone and establish a continuously higher moisture regime.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–810 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape ( Vitis vinifera L. ‘Tamar’) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shorter irrigation intervals established a continuously higher moisture regime.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L. ‘Tamar’Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
shorter irrigation intervalse0
Outcome
moisture regimee0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of shorter irrigation intervals, with proportionally smaller amounts of water applied in a single irrigation, was to decrease the variations of moisture content in the root zone and establish a continuously higher moisture regime.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–810 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape ( Vitis vinifera L. ‘Tamar’) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1174 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salts concentrated in a surface pocket and a deep layer separated by a leached zone.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L. ‘Tamar’Vitis viniferat0
Outcome
Saltse0
Qualifier
surface pocket and a deep layer with a leached zone between theme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salts were concentrated in a surface pocket and a deep layer with a leached zone between them.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–905 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape ( Vitis vinifera L. ‘Tamar’) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1174 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The positions of salt concentration layers depended on water applied per irrigation.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L. ‘Tamar’Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
amount of water applied in a single irrigatione0
Outcome
relative position of the concentration layerse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relative position of the concentration layers was determined by the amount of water applied in a single irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1025 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape ( Vitis vinifera L. ‘Tamar’) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shorter irrigation intervals improved relative water-use efficiency in grape production.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L. ‘Tamar’Vitis viniferae0
Treatment
shorter irrigation intervalse0
Outcome
Relative water use efficiencye0
Direction
positively affectede0
Qualifier
grape ( Vitis vinifera L. ‘Tamar’) productione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative water use efficiency was positively affected by shorter irrigation intervals both in terms of grape ( Vitis vinifera L. ‘Tamar’) production and of weight of prunings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1201 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shorter irrigation intervals improved relative water-use efficiency in pruning weight.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L. ‘Tamar’Vitis viniferae0
Treatment
shorter irrigation intervalse0
Outcome
Relative water use efficiencye0
Direction
positively affectede0
Qualifier
weight of pruningse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative water use efficiency was positively affected by shorter irrigation intervals both in terms of grape ( Vitis vinifera L. ‘Tamar’) production and of weight of prunings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1201 · show in text ↑

irrigation · soil: physics · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 14 positive, 8 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

irrigation · quality: grain · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.