Paper · 2014 · Functional Plant Biology

Morpho-structural and physiological response of container-grown Sangiovese and Montepulciano cvv. (Vitis vinifera) to re-watering after a pre-veraison limiting water deficit

Alberto Palliotti; Sergio Tombesi; Tommaso Frioni; et al.

11
claims
26
verbatim quotes
59
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A better physiological and productive performance of cv. Montepulciano versus cv. Sangiovese under well-watered conditions has been recently assessed. The objective of this study was to verify that this behaviour is maintained when a pre-veraison deficit irrigation (vines held at 40% pot capacity from fruit-set to veraison) followed by re-watering (pot capacity reported at 90%). Single leaf assimilation rate and stomatal conductance, diurnal and seasonal whole-canopy net CO2 exchange (NCER) and water use efficiency were always higher in Sangiovese under deficit irrigation. Due to water shortage Montepulciano displayed a more compact growing habit due to decreased shoot and internode length. Sangiovese showed excellent recovery upon re-watering as NCER resulted to be higher than the pre-stress period; however, this might also relate to early and severe basal leaf yellowing and shedding. Early deficit irrigation affected xylem characteristics of Montepulciano more than in Sangiovese; vessel density increased (37 vs 29%, respectively, compared with well-watered vines) and the hydraulic conductance decreased more (-13 vs -3% respectively) compared with well-watered vines. Yield components and technological maturity were similar in the two cultivars, whereas Montepulciano grapes had lower anthocyanins and phenolics. Higher physiological and productive efficiency under non-limiting water conditions showed by Montepulciano compared with Sangiovese was basically reversed when both cultivars were subjected to an early deficit irrigation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under deficit irrigation, Sangiovese had higher leaf assimilation, stomatal conductance and canopy net CO2 exchange than Montepulciano.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Material
Sangiovesee0
Treatment
deficit irrigatione0
Outcome
Single leaf assimilation rate and stomatal conductance, diurnal and seasonal whole-canopy net CO2 exchange (NCER)e0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Single leaf assimilation rate and stomatal conductance, diurnal and seasonal whole-canopy net CO2 exchange (NCER) and water use efficiency were always higher in Sangiovese under deficit irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–578 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–113 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under deficit irrigation, Sangiovese had higher water use efficiency.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Material
Sangiovesee0
Treatment
deficit irrigatione0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water use efficiency were always higher in Sangiovese under deficit irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–578 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water shortage reduced Montepulciano shoot and internode length, giving a compact habit.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Material
Montepulcianoe0
Treatment
water shortagee0
Outcome
shoot and internode lengthe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Due to water shortage Montepulciano displayed a more compact growing habit due to decreased shoot and internode length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–698 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Following rewatering, Sangiovese canopy net exchange exceeded its prestress level.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Material
Sangiovesee0
Treatment
re-wateringe0
Outcome
NCERe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
pre-stress periode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sangiovese showed excellent recovery upon re-watering as NCER resulted to be higher than the pre-stress period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–810 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Montepulciano vessel density increased 37% relative to well-watered vines under early deficit irrigation.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Material
Montepulcianoe1
Treatment
Early deficit irrigatione1
Outcome
vessel densitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
37e0
Comparator
well-watered vinese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“vessel density increased (37 vs 29%, respectively, compared with well-watered vines)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1081 · show in text ↑
e1

“Early deficit irrigation affected xylem characteristics of Montepulciano more than in Sangiovese”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sangiovese vessel density increased 29% relative to well-watered vines under early deficit irrigation.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Material
Sangiovesee1
Treatment
Early deficit irrigatione1
Outcome
vessel densitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
29%e0
Comparator
well-watered vinese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“vessel density increased (37 vs 29%, respectively, compared with well-watered vines)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1081 · show in text ↑
e1

“Early deficit irrigation affected xylem characteristics of Montepulciano more than in Sangiovese”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Montepulciano hydraulic conductance fell 13% relative to well-watered vines.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Material
Montepulcianoe1
Treatment
Early deficit irrigatione1
Outcome
hydraulic conductancee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
-13e0
Comparator
well-watered vinese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the hydraulic conductance decreased more (-13 vs -3% respectively) compared with well-watered vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1185 · show in text ↑
e1

“Early deficit irrigation affected xylem characteristics of Montepulciano more than in Sangiovese”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sangiovese hydraulic conductance fell 3% relative to well-watered vines.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Material
Sangiovesee1
Treatment
Early deficit irrigatione1
Outcome
hydraulic conductancee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
-3%e0
Comparator
well-watered vinese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the hydraulic conductance decreased more (-13 vs -3% respectively) compared with well-watered vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1185 · show in text ↑
e1

“Early deficit irrigation affected xylem characteristics of Montepulciano more than in Sangiovese”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–113 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield components and technological maturity were similar between cultivars.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Outcome
Yield components and technological maturitye0
Direction
similare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield components and technological maturity were similar in the two cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1264 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–113 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Montepulciano grapes had lower anthocyanins and phenolics.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Material
Montepulcianoe0
Organ / stage
grapese0
Outcome
anthocyanins and phenolicse0
Direction
lowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Montepulciano grapes had lower anthocyanins and phenolics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1331 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–113 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Montepulciano’s higher physiological and productive efficiency under ample water was reversed under early deficit irrigation.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Material
Montepulcianoe0
Outcome
physiological and productive efficiencye0
Direction
reversede0
Comparator
Sangiovesee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher physiological and productive efficiency under non-limiting water conditions showed by Montepulciano compared with Sangiovese was basically reversed when both cultivars were subjected to an early deficit irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1553 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–113 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: water · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 14 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.