Paper · 1978 · The Japanese Journal of Genetics

Production of interspecific hybrids between Brassica campestris and Brassica oleracea by culture in vitro of excised ovaries. II. Effects of coconut milk and casein hydrolysate on the development of excise ovaries.

NOBUMICHI INOMATA

7
claims
10
verbatim quotes
24
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Studies on development in vitro of excised ovaries in the reciprocal crosses between Brassica campestris L. and Brassica oleracea L. were carried out. Three cultivars each of B. campestris and of B. oleracea were used in the experiment. Development in vitro of excised ovaries 4 days after pollination was studied on culture media with coconutmilk and casein hydrolysate, which were added either separately or in various combinations. Results obtained were as follows. (1) Many seeds were obtained in both sibmates of B. campestris and B. oleracea. Seed set in the capsules was not so different in the media used in the experiment. (2) Many seeds and naked-embryos protruded from undeveloped seed coat were obtained in the capsules of B. campestris× B. oleracea. Effect of coconut milk and casein hydrolysate in the medium on the production of hybrid plants was favorable but not indispensable in culture in vitro of excised ovaries. Fifteen hybrid plants were obtained in all ovaries cultured. (3) In the reciprocal cross, B. oleracea×B. campestris, no needs and no naked-embryos were obtained in all ovaries cultured. (4) Culture in vitro of excised ovaries is useful as a new technique for the production of interspecific hybrids in B. campestris×B. oleracea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both parental sibmates produced many seeds.

Taxon
B. campestris and B. oleraceaBrassica oleraceaBrassica rapa subsp. oleiferae0
Outcome
Many seedse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica rapa subsp. oleifera
Brassica rapa subsp. oleifera · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Many seeds were obtained in both sibmates of B. campestris and B. oleracea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–548 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed set was similar across tested media.

Taxon
Brassica campestris and Brassica oleraceaBrassica oleraceaBrassica rapa subsp. oleiferat0
Treatment
media used in the experimente0
Outcome
Seed set in the capsulese0
Direction
not so differente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica rapa subsp. oleifera
Brassica rapa subsp. oleifera · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed set in the capsules was not so different in the media used in the experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–631 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica campestris and Brassica oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The B. campestris × B. oleracea cross yielded many seeds and naked embryos.

Taxon
B. campestris× B. oleraceaBrassica rapa subsp. oleiferae0
Outcome
Many seeds and naked-embryos protruded from undeveloped seed coate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. oleifera
Brassica rapa subsp. oleifera · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Many seeds and naked-embryos protruded from undeveloped seed coat were obtained in the capsules of B. campestris× B. oleracea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–762 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coconut milk and casein hydrolysate favored hybrid production but were not indispensable.

Taxon
Brassica campestris and Brassica oleraceaBrassica oleraceaBrassica rapa subsp. oleiferat0
Treatment
coconut milk and casein hydrolysatee0
Outcome
production of hybrid plantse0
Direction
favorable but not indispensablee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica rapa subsp. oleifera
Brassica rapa subsp. oleifera · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Effect of coconut milk and casein hydrolysate in the medium on the production of hybrid plants was favorable but not indispensable in culture in vitro of excised ovaries.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica campestris and Brassica oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fifteen hybrid plants arose from all cultured ovaries.

Taxon
Brassica campestris and Brassica oleraceaBrassica oleraceaBrassica rapa subsp. oleiferat0
Outcome
hybrid plantse0
Value
Fifteene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica rapa subsp. oleifera
Brassica rapa subsp. oleifera · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fifteen hybrid plants were obtained in all ovaries cultured.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–994 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica campestris and Brassica oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reciprocal B. oleracea × B. campestris cross yielded no seeds or naked embryos.

Taxon
B. oleracea×B. campestrisBrassica oleraceae0
Outcome
no needs and no naked-embryose0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the reciprocal cross, B. oleracea×B. campestris, no needs and no naked-embryos were obtained in all ovaries cultured.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1119 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excised ovary culture was useful for producing B. campestris × B. oleracea hybrids.

Taxon
B. campestris×B. oleraceaBrassica rapa subsp. oleiferae0
Outcome
production of interspecific hybridse0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. oleifera
Brassica rapa subsp. oleifera · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Culture in vitro of excised ovaries is useful as a new technique for the production of interspecific hybrids in B. campestris×B. oleracea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1262 · show in text ↑

in vitro · yield · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

in vitro · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.