Paper · 1995 · Transactions of the ASAE

Control of Irrigation Scheduling Using Temperature-time Thresholds

D. F. Wanjura; D. R. Upchurch; J. R. Mahan

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
77
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Irrigation of cotton was scheduled using a minimum three-day irrigation cycle which was adjusted by temperature-time thresholds (TTT). These TTT were measured as the amount of time that canopy temperature exceeded 28 C during one day. The TTT that were tested ranged from 2.5 to 7.0 h in 1991 and from 2 to 8 h in 1992. In both years an increase of 1 h in TTT decreased the number of irrigations by 1.3 for the period day of year (DOY) 184 to DOY 243. Average canopy temperature between DOY 198 and DOY 273 was 1.2 C higher in the 7.5 TTT than in 2.5 TTT in 1991 and in 1992 the 8 TTT treatment was 2.2 C higher than the 2 TTT treatment (averages are based on time when air temperature exceeded 28 C and total radiation exceeded 500 W/m2). The TTT treatments produced consistent differences in irrigation frequency and application amount in both years. Yields were not different among the TTT treatments in either year. In 1991 Verticillium wilt, a severe infestation of aphids, and 26.6 cm of rainfall during July through September reduced yields in all treatments. All irrigated yields were high in 1992 compared to long-term averages in spite of a late planting date. Even a small amount of irrigation in 1992 combined with a full soil water profile prevented significant moisture stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each 1 h increase in the temperature-time threshold decreased the number of irrigations by 1.3 in both years.

Treatment
an increase of 1 h in TTTe1
Outcome
the number of irrigationse1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
1.3e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation of cotton was scheduled using a minimum three-day irrigation cycle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“In both years an increase of 1 h in TTT decreased the number of irrigations by 1.3 for the period day of year (DOY) 184 to DOY 243”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–450 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canopy temperature was 1.2 C higher at the 7.5 TTT than at the 2.5 TTT in 1991.

Treatment
7.5 TTTe2
Outcome
Average canopy temperaturee2
Direction
highere2
Value
1.2 Ce2
Comparator
2.5 TTTe2
Setting
in 1991e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation of cotton was scheduled using a minimum three-day irrigation cycle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
e2

“Average canopy temperature between DOY 198 and DOY 273 was 1.2 C higher in the 7.5 TTT than in 2.5 TTT in 1991”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–562 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1992 canopy temperature was 2.2 C higher with the 8 TTT treatment than with the 2 TTT treatment.

Treatment
8 TTT treatmente3
Outcome
Average canopy temperaturee2
Direction
highere3
Value
2.2 Ce3
Comparator
2 TTT treatmente3
Setting
in 1992e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation of cotton was scheduled using a minimum three-day irrigation cycle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
e2

“Average canopy temperature between DOY 198 and DOY 273 was 1.2 C higher in the 7.5 TTT than in 2.5 TTT in 1991”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–562 · show in text ↑
e3

“in 1992 the 8 TTT treatment was 2.2 C higher than the 2 TTT treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–636 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The TTT treatments produced consistent differences in irrigation frequency and application amount in both years.

Treatment
TTT treatmentse4
Outcome
irrigation frequency and application amounte4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation of cotton was scheduled using a minimum three-day irrigation cycle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
e4

“The TTT treatments produced consistent differences in irrigation frequency and application amount in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–851 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yields did not differ among the TTT treatments in either year.

Treatment
TTT treatmentse5
Outcome
Yieldse5
Direction
not differente5
Comparator
among the TTT treatmentse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation of cotton was scheduled using a minimum three-day irrigation cycle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
e5

“Yields were not different among the TTT treatments in either year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–918 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Verticillium wilt and a severe aphid infestation reduced cotton yields in all treatments in 1991.

Interactor
Verticillium wilte6pathogen
Second interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae6pest
Outcome
yieldse6
Direction
reducede6
Qualifier
26.6 cm of rainfall during July through Septembere6
Setting
1991e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation of cotton was scheduled using a minimum three-day irrigation cycle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
e6

“In 1991 Verticillium wilt, a severe infestation of aphids, and 26.6 cm of rainfall during July through September reduced yields in all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1065 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All irrigated cotton yields were high in 1992 compared with long-term averages.

Outcome
All irrigated yieldse7
Qualifier
in spite of a late planting datee7
Comparator
long-term averagese7
Setting
in 1992e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation of cotton was scheduled using a minimum three-day irrigation cycle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
e7

“All irrigated yields were high in 1992 compared to long-term averages in spite of a late planting date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1169 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A small amount of irrigation with a full soil water profile prevented significant moisture stress in 1992.

Treatment
a small amount of irrigation in 1992 combined with a full soil water profilee7
Outcome
significant moisture stresse7
Direction
preventede7
Setting
in 1992e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation of cotton was scheduled using a minimum three-day irrigation cycle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
e7

“Even a small amount of irrigation in 1992 combined with a full soil water profile prevented significant moisture stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1290 · show in text ↑

irrigation · soil: physics · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 19 positive, 4 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

soil water · soil: physics · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.