Abstract
Irrigation of cotton was scheduled using a minimum three-day irrigation cycle which was adjusted by temperature-time thresholds (TTT). These TTT were measured as the amount of time that canopy temperature exceeded 28 C during one day. The TTT that were tested ranged from 2.5 to 7.0 h in 1991 and from 2 to 8 h in 1992. In both years an increase of 1 h in TTT decreased the number of irrigations by 1.3 for the period day of year (DOY) 184 to DOY 243. Average canopy temperature between DOY 198 and DOY 273 was 1.2 C higher in the 7.5 TTT than in 2.5 TTT in 1991 and in 1992 the 8 TTT treatment was 2.2 C higher than the 2 TTT treatment (averages are based on time when air temperature exceeded 28 C and total radiation exceeded 500 W/m2). The TTT treatments produced consistent differences in irrigation frequency and application amount in both years. Yields were not different among the TTT treatments in either year. In 1991 Verticillium wilt, a severe infestation of aphids, and 26.6 cm of rainfall during July through September reduced yields in all treatments. All irrigated yields were high in 1992 compared to long-term averages in spite of a late planting date. Even a small amount of irrigation in 1992 combined with a full soil water profile prevented significant moisture stress.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Each 1 h increase in the temperature-time threshold decreased the number of irrigations by 1.3 in both years.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- an increase of 1 h in TTTe1
- Outcome
- the number of irrigationse1
- Direction
- decreasede1
- Value
- 1.3e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Irrigation of cotton was scheduled using a minimum three-day irrigation cycle”
e1“In both years an increase of 1 h in TTT decreased the number of irrigations by 1.3 for the period day of year (DOY) 184 to DOY 243”
Claim · model-written summary
Canopy temperature was 1.2 C higher at the 7.5 TTT than at the 2.5 TTT in 1991.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- 7.5 TTTe2
- Outcome
- Average canopy temperaturee2
- Direction
- highere2
- Value
- 1.2 Ce2
- Comparator
- 2.5 TTTe2
- Setting
- in 1991e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Irrigation of cotton was scheduled using a minimum three-day irrigation cycle”
e2“Average canopy temperature between DOY 198 and DOY 273 was 1.2 C higher in the 7.5 TTT than in 2.5 TTT in 1991”
Claim · model-written summary
In 1992 canopy temperature was 2.2 C higher with the 8 TTT treatment than with the 2 TTT treatment.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- 8 TTT treatmente3
- Outcome
- Average canopy temperaturee2
- Direction
- highere3
- Value
- 2.2 Ce3
- Comparator
- 2 TTT treatmente3
- Setting
- in 1992e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Irrigation of cotton was scheduled using a minimum three-day irrigation cycle”
e2“Average canopy temperature between DOY 198 and DOY 273 was 1.2 C higher in the 7.5 TTT than in 2.5 TTT in 1991”
e3“in 1992 the 8 TTT treatment was 2.2 C higher than the 2 TTT treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
The TTT treatments produced consistent differences in irrigation frequency and application amount in both years.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- TTT treatmentse4
- Outcome
- irrigation frequency and application amounte4
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Irrigation of cotton was scheduled using a minimum three-day irrigation cycle”
e4“The TTT treatments produced consistent differences in irrigation frequency and application amount in both years”
Claim · model-written summary
Yields did not differ among the TTT treatments in either year.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- TTT treatmentse5
- Outcome
- Yieldse5
- Direction
- not differente5
- Comparator
- among the TTT treatmentse5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Irrigation of cotton was scheduled using a minimum three-day irrigation cycle”
e5“Yields were not different among the TTT treatments in either year”
Claim · model-written summary
Verticillium wilt and a severe aphid infestation reduced cotton yields in all treatments in 1991.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Interactor
- Verticillium wilte6pathogen
- Second interactor
- aphidsAphidomorphae6pest
- Outcome
- yieldse6
- Direction
- reducede6
- Qualifier
- 26.6 cm of rainfall during July through Septembere6
- Setting
- 1991e6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Irrigation of cotton was scheduled using a minimum three-day irrigation cycle”
e6“In 1991 Verticillium wilt, a severe infestation of aphids, and 26.6 cm of rainfall during July through September reduced yields in all treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
All irrigated cotton yields were high in 1992 compared with long-term averages.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Outcome
- All irrigated yieldse7
- Qualifier
- in spite of a late planting datee7
- Comparator
- long-term averagese7
- Setting
- in 1992e7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Irrigation of cotton was scheduled using a minimum three-day irrigation cycle”
e7“All irrigated yields were high in 1992 compared to long-term averages in spite of a late planting date”
Claim · model-written summary
A small amount of irrigation with a full soil water profile prevented significant moisture stress in 1992.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- a small amount of irrigation in 1992 combined with a full soil water profilee7
- Outcome
- significant moisture stresse7
- Direction
- preventede7
- Setting
- in 1992e7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Irrigation of cotton was scheduled using a minimum three-day irrigation cycle”
e7“Even a small amount of irrigation in 1992 combined with a full soil water profile prevented significant moisture stress”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · soil: physics · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →soil water · soil: physics · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.