Paper · 2014 · Photosynthetica

Response of two tomato cultivars to field-applied proline under irrigation with saline water: Growth, chlorophyll fluorescence and nutritional aspects

B. Kahlaoui; M. Hachicha; S. Rejeb; et al.

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
28
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The response of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) to abiotic stress has been widely investigated. Recent physiological studies focus on the use of osmoprotectants to ameliorate stress damage, but experiments at a field level are scarce. Two tomato cultivars were used for an experiment with saline water (6.57 dS m-1) and subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) in a silty clay soil. Rio Grande is a salinity-tolerant cultivar, while Heinz-2274 is the salt-sensitive cultivar. Exogenous application of proline was done by foliar spray at two concentrations (10 and 20 mg L-1) during the flowering stage. Control plants were treated with saline water without proline. Proline at the lower concentration (10 mg L-1) increased dry mass of different plant organs (leaves, stems, and roots) and it improved various chlorophyll a fluorescence parameters compared with controls. Regarding mineral nutrition, K+ and P were higher in different organs, while low accumulation of Na+ occurred. However, Mg2+ was very high in all tissues of Rio Grande at the higher concentration of proline applied. Thus, the foliar spray of proline at 10 mg L-1 increased the tolerance of both cultivars. The growth of aboveground biomass of Heinz-2274 was enhanced by 63.5%, while Rio Grande improved only by 38.9%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar proline at 10 mg L-1 increased leaf, stem, and root dry mass relative to controls.

Treatment
Proline at the lower concentration (10 mg L-1)e0
Outcome
dry mass of different plant organs (leaves, stems, and roots)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Proline at the lower concentration (10 mg L-1) increased dry mass of different plant organs (leaves, stems, and roots) and it improved various chlorophyll a fluorescence parameters compared with controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–863 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar proline at 10 mg L-1 improved chlorophyll a fluorescence parameters relative to controls.

Treatment
Proline at the lower concentration (10 mg L-1)e0
Outcome
chlorophyll a fluorescence parameterse0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Proline at the lower concentration (10 mg L-1) increased dry mass of different plant organs (leaves, stems, and roots) and it improved various chlorophyll a fluorescence parameters compared with controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–863 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–22 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K+ had higher levels in different organs under proline treatment.

Organ / stage
different organse0
Outcome
K+e0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regarding mineral nutrition, K+ and P were higher in different organs, while low accumulation of Na+ occurred.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–974 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–22 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P had higher levels in different organs under proline treatment.

Organ / stage
different organse0
Outcome
Pe0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regarding mineral nutrition, K+ and P were higher in different organs, while low accumulation of Na+ occurred.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–974 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–22 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Na+ had low levels in different organs under proline treatment.

Organ / stage
different organse0
Outcome
Na+e0
Direction
lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regarding mineral nutrition, K+ and P were higher in different organs, while low accumulation of Na+ occurred.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–974 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–22 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rio Grande had very high Mg2+ in all tissues at the higher proline concentration.

Material
Rio Grandee0
Organ / stage
all tissuese0
Treatment
higher concentration of prolinee0
Outcome
Mg2+e0
Direction
very highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mg2+ was very high in all tissues of Rio Grande at the higher concentration of proline applied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1079 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that foliar proline at 10 mg L-1 increased tolerance of both cultivars.

Treatment
foliar spray of proline at 10 mg L-1e0
Outcome
tolerancee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the foliar spray of proline at 10 mg L-1 increased the tolerance of both cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1169 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aboveground biomass growth of Heinz-2274 enhanced by 63.5%.

Material
Heinz-2274e0
Treatment
foliar spray of proline at 10 mg L-1e1
Outcome
growth of aboveground biomasse0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
63.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth of aboveground biomass of Heinz-2274 was enhanced by 63.5%, while Rio Grande improved only by 38.9%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1281 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–22 · show in text ↑
e1

“the foliar spray of proline at 10 mg L-1 increased the tolerance of both cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1169 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aboveground biomass growth of Rio Grande improved by 38.9%.

Material
Rio Grandee0
Treatment
foliar spray of proline at 10 mg L-1e1
Outcome
growth of aboveground biomasse0
Direction
improvede0
Value
38.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth of aboveground biomass of Heinz-2274 was enhanced by 63.5%, while Rio Grande improved only by 38.9%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1281 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–22 · show in text ↑
e1

“the foliar spray of proline at 10 mg L-1 increased the tolerance of both cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1169 · show in text ↑

proline · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

proline · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

proline · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

application · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

150 papers: 134 positive, 16 negative or no effect

133 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

146 papers more in this group

See all 150 papers →

application · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

253 papers: 225 positive, 28 negative or no effect

224 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

249 papers more in this group

See all 253 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.