Paper · 2009 · Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions

Impaired Colonization and Infection of Tomato Roots by the Δfrp1 Mutant of Fusarium oxysporum Correlates with Reduced CWDE Gene Expression

Wilfried Jonkers; Christopher D. Andrade Rodrigues; Martijn Rep

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
50
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The vascular wilt pathogen Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici efficiently invades roots and colonizes vascular tissues of its host tomato. For these processes, the F-box protein Frp1 is required. The Fusarium oxysporum Deltafrp1 mutant was characterized in detail to uncover the cause of its colonization defect. Using growth assays, we could attribute poor root colonization to reduced assimilation of organic acids, amino acids (except proline), or polysaccharides, singly or in combination. External root colonization by the Deltafrp1 mutant is restored by the addition of 0.1% glucose or proline but infection still does not occur. This is due to the inability of the Deltafrp1 mutant to penetrate the roots, as demonstrated by the lack of expression of SIX1 in the Deltafrp1 strain, which is a gene exclusively expressed inside roots, and loss of cell wall-degrading enzyme (CWDE) gene expression. Many of the metabolic defects of the Deltafrp1 strain can be attributed to reduced expression of the ICL1 (isocitrate lyase) gene. Strikingly, an Deltaicl1 mutant is still fully pathogenic and capable of external root colonization. We conclude that the inability of the Deltafrp1 strain to colonize and invade roots is not primarily due to metabolic defects but can be attributed to reduced expression of several CWDE genes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deltafrp1 had poor tomato root colonization associated with reduced nutrient assimilation.

Material
Deltafrp1e1
Interactor
Fusarium oxysporumFusarium oxysporumt0pathogen
Outcome
poor root colonizatione0
Qualifier
reduced assimilation of organic acids, amino acids (except proline), or polysaccharidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using growth assays, we could attribute poor root colonization to reduced assimilation of organic acids, amino acids (except proline), or polysaccharides, singly or in combination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–496 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Roots by the Δfrp1 Mutant of Fusarium oxysporum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–93 · show in text ↑
e1

“External root colonization by the Deltafrp1 mutant is restored by the addition of 0.1% glucose or proline”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–602 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glucose or proline restored external root colonization by Deltafrp1.

Material
Deltafrp1e0
Treatment
0.1% glucose or prolinee0
Outcome
External root colonizatione0
Direction
restorede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“External root colonization by the Deltafrp1 mutant is restored by the addition of 0.1% glucose or proline”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–602 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glucose or proline did not restore infection by Deltafrp1.

Material
Deltafrp1e0
Treatment
0.1% glucose or prolinee0
Outcome
infection still does not occure0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“External root colonization by the Deltafrp1 mutant is restored by the addition of 0.1% glucose or proline but infection still does not occur.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–638 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deltafrp1 could not penetrate tomato roots.

Material
Deltafrp1e0
Outcome
inability of the Deltafrp1 mutant to penetrate the rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inability of the Deltafrp1 mutant to penetrate the roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–714 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SIX1 expression was absent in Deltafrp1.

Material
Deltafrp1e0
Gene
SIX1e0
Outcome
lack of expression of SIX1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lack of expression of SIX1 in the Deltafrp1 strain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–789 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CWDE gene expression was lost in Deltafrp1.

Gene
cell wall-degrading enzyme (CWDE) genee0
Outcome
loss of cell wall-degrading enzyme (CWDE) gene expressione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“loss of cell wall-degrading enzyme (CWDE) gene expression.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–905 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced ICL1 expression was attributed as a cause of metabolic defects.

Material
Deltafrp1e0
Gene
ICL1 (isocitrate lyase) genee0
Outcome
metabolic defects of the Deltafrp1 straine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Many of the metabolic defects of the Deltafrp1 strain can be attributed to reduced expression of the ICL1 (isocitrate lyase) gene.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1036 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deltaicl1 retained full pathogenicity.

Material
Deltaicl1e0
Outcome
fully pathogenice0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an Deltaicl1 mutant is still fully pathogenic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1094 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deltaicl1 retained external root colonization.

Material
Deltaicl1e0
Outcome
capable of external root colonizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an Deltaicl1 mutant is still fully pathogenic and capable of external root colonization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1137 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced CWDE gene expression was attributed as the main cause of Deltafrp1 root invasion defects.

Material
Deltafrp1e0
Gene
CWDE genese0
Outcome
inability of the Deltafrp1 strain to colonize and invade rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the inability of the Deltafrp1 strain to colonize and invade roots is not primarily due to metabolic defects but can be attributed to reduced expression of several CWDE genes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1330 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑

glucose · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

proline · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.