Paper · 1998 · Plant Disease

Efficacy of Fungicide Treatments for Control of Common Rust and Northern Leaf Spot in Hybrid Corn Seed Production

S. N. Wegulo; J. M. Rivera-C; C. A. Martinson; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted during the 1992 and 1993 growing seasons in 13 commercial fields in Iowa to assess the efficacy of foliar applications of fungicides to seed corn for control of common rust, Puccinia sorghi, and northern leaf spot, Bipolaris zeicola. Chlorothalonil, mancozeb, and/or propiconazole sprays were initiated at growth stage (GS) 2.5, GS 4.0, or approximately 2 weeks before detasseling, and applications were repeated up to five times at various growth stages. The majority of fungicide treatments resulted in an increase in salable seed units (1 unit = 80,000 seeds) compared to untreated control treatments. The greatest increase in salable seed occurred in the large and medium seed size units. Although disease severity on the final assessment date in both years and standardized area under the disease progress curve in 1993 were significantly higher (P ≤ 0.05) in untreated control plots than in fungicide-treated plots in all experiments, the best disease control was provided by 5 applications of chlorothalonil or 2 to 4 applications of chlorothalonil, mancozeb, or propiconazole initiated on the first spray date.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most fungicide treatments increased salable seed units compared with untreated control treatments.

Treatment
fungicide treatmentse2
Outcome
salable seed unitse2
Direction
increasee2
Comparator
untreated control treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“foliar applications of fungicides to seed corn for control of common rust, Puccinia sorghi, and northern leaf spot, Bipolaris zeicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–265 · show in text ↑
e2

“The majority of fungicide treatments resulted in an increase in salable seed units (1 unit = 80,000 seeds) compared to untreated control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–636 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The greatest increase in salable seed occurred in the large and medium seed size units.

Outcome
salable seede3
Direction
greatest increasee3
Qualifier
in the large and medium seed size unitse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“foliar applications of fungicides to seed corn for control of common rust, Puccinia sorghi, and northern leaf spot, Bipolaris zeicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–265 · show in text ↑
e3

“The greatest increase in salable seed occurred in the large and medium seed size units”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–724 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease severity and standardized AUDPC in 1993 were significantly higher in untreated control plots than in fungicide-treated plots.

Treatment
fungicide-treated plotse4
Interactor
Puccinia sorghiPuccinia sorghie1pathogen
Second interactor
Bipolaris zeicolaBipolaris zeicolae1pathogen
Outcome
disease severity on the final assessment date in both years and standardized area under the disease progress curve in 1993e4
Direction
highere4
Qualifier
P ≤ 0.05e4
Comparator
untreated control plotse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Puccinia sorghi
Puccinia sorghi · InteractorUniversity of Georgia Plant Pathology Archive from United States University of Georgia · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bipolaris zeicola
Bipolaris zeicola · Second interactorEric McKenzie · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“foliar applications of fungicides to seed corn for control of common rust, Puccinia sorghi, and northern leaf spot, Bipolaris zeicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–265 · show in text ↑
e4

“disease severity on the final assessment date in both years and standardized area under the disease progress curve in 1993 were significantly higher (P ≤ 0.05) in untreated control plots than in fungicide-treated plots in all experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–972 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five applications of chlorothalonil gave the best disease control.

Treatment
5 applications of chlorothalonile5
Outcome
disease controle5
Direction
beste5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“foliar applications of fungicides to seed corn for control of common rust, Puccinia sorghi, and northern leaf spot, Bipolaris zeicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–265 · show in text ↑
e5

“the best disease control was provided by 5 applications of chlorothalonil or 2 to 4 applications of chlorothalonil, mancozeb, or propiconazole initiated on the first spray date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two to four applications of chlorothalonil, mancozeb or propiconazole started at the first spray date gave the best disease control.

Treatment
2 to 4 applications of chlorothalonil, mancozeb, or propiconazole initiated on the first spray datee5
Outcome
disease controle5
Direction
beste5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“foliar applications of fungicides to seed corn for control of common rust, Puccinia sorghi, and northern leaf spot, Bipolaris zeicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–265 · show in text ↑
e5

“the best disease control was provided by 5 applications of chlorothalonil or 2 to 4 applications of chlorothalonil, mancozeb, or propiconazole initiated on the first spray date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1150 · show in text ↑

mancozeb · control · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

propiconazole · control · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · control · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.