Paper · 2011 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Using Soil Potassium Adsorption and Yield Response Models to Determine Potassium Fertilizer Rates for Potato Crop on a Calcareous Soil in Pakistan

Abdul Hannan; M. Arif; A. M. Ranjha; et al.

10
claims
16
verbatim quotes
20
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Ustochrept soil was collected from a major potato-growing area in Pakistan for a potassium (K) adsorption isotherm experiment. Adsorption data were fitted to Freundlich and Langmuir adsorption models. Results showed that the Freundlich model (R2 = 0.96**) fit the data better than did the Langmuir model. Fertilizer rates were calculated based on the Freundlich model and targeted solution K levels at 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, and 27 mg K L−1. A field experiment was then conducted on the soil to assess the effect of various soil solution K levels (0–27 mg L−1, with K fertilizer rates at 0, 24, 49, 75, 101, 128, 155, 182, 210, and 237 kg ha−1), on tuber yield and quality along with 300 kg N and 250 kg P2O5 ha−1 as basal doses. Yield response models (linear plus plateau, quadratic, square root, quadratic plus plateau, and exponential) were used to calculate the optimal fertilizer rate for potato crop. Linear plus plateau model fit the data with less bias than the other models. There was a significant effect of K use on the yield and quality of potatoes. Potassium fertilizer application at 130 kg K ha−1, which is equivalent to a soil solution level of 12 mg K L−1, maximized the tuber yield of potato. However, for the improvement in tuber dry matter, reducing sugars, protein contents, and starch contents, the soil solution K level required was as high as14.62 mg L−1 (157 kg ha−1). Even greater rate of K, 17.74 mg L−1 (190 kg ha−1), was needed to maximize vitamin C content in potato.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Freundlich adsorption model fit the soil data better than Langmuir, with R2 = 0.96**.

Outcome
fit the datae0
Direction
bettere0
Value
R2 = 0.96**e0
Comparator
Langmuir modele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Freundlich model (R2 = 0.96**) fit the data better than did the Langmuir model.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 221–304 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–113 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The linear plus plateau yield response model fit with less bias than the other models.

Outcome
fit the data with less biase0
Direction
less biase0
Comparator
other modelse0

Not reportedValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Linear plus plateau model fit the data with less bias than the other models.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–992 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium use significantly affected potato yield.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume0
Treatment
K usee0
Outcome
yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a significant effect of K use on the yield and quality of potatoes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1070 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium use significantly affected potato quality.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume0
Treatment
K usee0
Outcome
qualitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a significant effect of K use on the yield and quality of potatoes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1070 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

130 kg K ha−1 maximized potato tuber yield, corresponding to 12 mg K L−1 in soil solution.

Treatment
Potassium fertilizer application at 130 kg K ha−1e0
Outcome
tuber yielde0
Direction
maximizede0
Value
12 mg K L−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potassium fertilizer application at 130 kg K ha−1, which is equivalent to a soil solution level of 12 mg K L−1, maximized the tuber yield of potato.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1219 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Improving tuber dry matter required a soil solution K level as high as 14.62 mg L−1, equivalent to 157 kg ha−1.

Treatment
soil solution K levele0
Outcome
tuber dry mattere0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
14.62 mg L−1e0
Qualifier
157 kg ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for the improvement in tuber dry matter, reducing sugars, protein contents, and starch contents, the soil solution K level required was as high as14.62 mg L−1 (157 kg ha−1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1402 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Improving tuber reducing sugars required a soil solution K level as high as 14.62 mg L−1.

Treatment
soil solution K levele0
Outcome
reducing sugarse0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
14.62 mg L−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for the improvement in tuber dry matter, reducing sugars, protein contents, and starch contents, the soil solution K level required was as high as14.62 mg L−1 (157 kg ha−1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1402 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Improving tuber protein contents required a soil solution K level as high as 14.62 mg L−1.

Treatment
soil solution K levele0
Outcome
protein contentse0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
14.62 mg L−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for the improvement in tuber dry matter, reducing sugars, protein contents, and starch contents, the soil solution K level required was as high as14.62 mg L−1 (157 kg ha−1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1402 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Improving tuber starch contents required a soil solution K level as high as 14.62 mg L−1.

Treatment
soil solution K levele0
Outcome
starch contentse0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
14.62 mg L−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for the improvement in tuber dry matter, reducing sugars, protein contents, and starch contents, the soil solution K level required was as high as14.62 mg L−1 (157 kg ha−1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1402 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximizing potato vitamin C required 17.74 mg L−1 soil solution K, equivalent to 190 kg ha−1.

Treatment
rate of Ke0
Outcome
vitamin C contente0
Direction
maximizee0
Value
17.74 mg L−1e0
Qualifier
190 kg ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Even greater rate of K, 17.74 mg L−1 (190 kg ha−1), was needed to maximize vitamin C content in potato.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1506 · show in text ↑

potassium · quality: protein · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

potassium · quality: sugar starch · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

potassium · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 21 positive, 3 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

450 papers: 394 positive, 56 negative or no effect

393 papers in the same direction as this paper · 48 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

446 papers more in this group

See all 450 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.