Paper · 1965 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

COMPACT MUTANTS OF APPLE INDUCED BY IONIZING RADIATION

K. Lapins

8
claims
23
verbatim quotes
28
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Mutations of compact habit of growth were induced in selected apple varieties by acute irradiation with gamma rays from a Co 60 source at doses ranging from 3750 rad to 7500 rad. The rate of mutation was high. In trees of the McIntosh variety, repropagated from irradiated material, the percentage of total vegetative (tree or leaf) mutants was 9.8 and the percentage of compact mutants 5.2. The compact mutants were characterized by shortened internodes and reduced tree size. Various degrees of growth reduction were induced by the radiation treatment. Most of the compact mutants produced fruit of an undesirable shape, often flattened, irregular, and grooved. However, mutants were selected which combined the desirable compact growth habit with fruit that was characteristic of the variety.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gamma irradiation induced compact growth mutations in apple.

Treatment
acute irradiation with gamma rays from a Co 60 source at doses ranging from 3750 rad to 7500 rade0
Outcome
Mutations of compact habit of growthe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mutations of compact habit of growth were induced in selected apple varieties by acute irradiation with gamma rays from a Co 60 source at doses ranging from 3750 rad to 7500 rad”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–177 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mutation rate was high.

Outcome
rate of mutatione0
Direction
highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rate of mutation was high”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–208 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑
t1

“APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In repropagated McIntosh trees, total vegetative mutants were 9.8%.

Material
McIntoshe0
Outcome
percentage of total vegetative (tree or leaf) mutantse0
Value
9.8e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In trees of the McIntosh variety, repropagated from irradiated material, the percentage of total vegetative (tree or leaf) mutants was 9.8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–348 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑
t1

“APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In repropagated McIntosh trees, compact mutants were 5.2%.

Material
McIntoshe1
Outcome
percentage of compact mutantse0
Value
5.2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the percentage of compact mutants 5.2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–390 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑
t1

“APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑
e1

“In trees of the McIntosh variety, repropagated from irradiated material, the percentage of total vegetative (tree or leaf) mutants was 9.8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–348 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compact mutants had shortened internodes and reduced tree size.

Material
compact mutantse0
Outcome
shortened internodes and reduced tree sizee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The compact mutants were characterized by shortened internodes and reduced tree size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–476 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑
t1

“APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Radiation induced varying degrees of growth reduction.

Treatment
radiation treatmente0
Outcome
growth reductione0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Various degrees of growth reduction were induced by the radiation treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–553 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑
t1

“APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most compact mutants bore undesirably shaped fruit.

Material
compact mutantse0
Outcome
fruit of an undesirable shape, often flattened, irregular, and groovede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Most of the compact mutants produced fruit of an undesirable shape, often flattened, irregular, and grooved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–662 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑
t1

“APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selected mutants combined compact growth with fruit characteristic of the variety.

Material
mutantse0
Outcome
desirable compact growth habit with fruit that was characteristic of the varietye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mutants were selected which combined the desirable compact growth habit with fruit that was characteristic of the variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–794 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑
t1

“APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑

radiation · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.