Paper · 1954 · Journal of Heredity

MUTATIONS IN APPLES INDUCED BY X-RADIATION

C. J. BISHOP

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
19
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Dormant scions of the diploid apple varieties Yellow Bellflower, Cortland, Sandow and Golden Russet were treated with 3500–4000r of X-rays and grafted into grown trees by the framework method, inserting 100 to 200 scions per tree. Typical abnormalities in the leaves and bifurcation of the branches were observed in the early growth from the scions. The X-rays also caused an abnormal short thick shoot development and induced early formation of the flower buds. During the second season, grafting these buds produced a total of about 200 apples, many of them of giant size and irregular in shape. Of 150 apples carefully examined when picked, nine were found to be sectorial color chimaeras. Color changes were observed in the direction of both more and less red color. A comparison of the picked fruit from the X-rayed scions with a sample of 150 apples from non X-rayed trees showed both more and wider sectors in the fruit from the X-rayed scions. The results indicate that X-rays may be used as an artificial method of inducing color gene mutations in apples.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

X-rayed apple scions showed leaf abnormalities and branch bifurcation.

Taxon
APPLESt0
Treatment
X-rayse1
Outcome
abnormalities in the leaves and bifurcation of the branchese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“APPLES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–19 · show in text ↑
e0

“Typical abnormalities in the leaves and bifurcation of the branches were observed in the early growth from the scions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–349 · show in text ↑
e1

“The X-rays also caused an abnormal short thick shoot development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–414 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

X-rays caused short, thick shoots and early flower-bud formation in apples.

Taxon
APPLESt0
Treatment
X-rayse0
Outcome
abnormal short thick shoot development and induced early formation of the flower budse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“APPLES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–19 · show in text ↑
e0

“The X-rays also caused an abnormal short thick shoot development and induced early formation of the flower buds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–462 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

About 200 apples formed from grafted buds in the second season, many giant and irregular.

Outcome
apples, many of them of giant size and irregular in shapee0
Value
about 200 applese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the second season, grafting these buds produced a total of about 200 apples, many of them of giant size and irregular in shape.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–597 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nine of 150 examined apples were sectorial color chimaeras.

Outcome
sectorial color chimaerase0
Value
ninee0
Qualifier
150 applese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Of 150 apples carefully examined when picked, nine were found to be sectorial color chimaeras.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–692 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple fruit color changed toward both more and less red.

Taxon
APPLESt0
Outcome
Color changese0
Direction
both more and less red colore0

Verbatim

t0

“APPLES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–19 · show in text ↑
e0

“Color changes were observed in the direction of both more and less red color.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–770 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit from X-rayed apple scions had more and wider color sectors than fruit from untreated trees.

Treatment
X-rayed scionse0
Outcome
sectorse0
Direction
more and widere0
Comparator
non X-rayed treese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–19 · show in text ↑
e0

“A comparison of the picked fruit from the X-rayed scions with a sample of 150 apples from non X-rayed trees showed both more and wider sectors in the fruit from the X-rayed scions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–951 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that X-rays may induce apple color-gene mutations.

Outcome
X-rays may be used as an artificial method of inducing color gene mutationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results indicate that X-rays may be used as an artificial method of inducing color gene mutations in apples.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1064 · show in text ↑

radiation · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.