Paper · 2012

Preliminary study on mutagenic effects of 60Co-γ irradiation on Golden Delicious apple and Gala apple.

Yujiao Zhang; Yang Feng; Zhao Lin; et al.

6
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The mutagenic effects of 60Co-γ irradiation at different doses on the annual branches of Golden Delicious apple and Gala apple were studied.The results showed that: as the radiation dosage increased,the survival rate of the grafted branches decreased.The suitable irradiation dose for Golden Delicious apple and Gala apple was both 40~80 Gy.After irradiation within this dose range,the branches of apple trees became shorter,leaves became narrower,and the number of binary-cross branches and more-cross branches increased significantly.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted apple branch survival decreased as radiation dosage increased.

Treatment
radiation dosagee0
Outcome
survival rate of the grafted branchese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“as the radiation dosage increased,the survival rate of the grafted branches decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–251 · show in text ↑
t0

“Golden Delicious apple and Gala apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The suitable irradiation dose for Golden Delicious apple was 40~80 Gy.

Material
Golden Delicious applee0
Outcome
suitable irradiation dosee0
Value
40~80 Gye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The suitable irradiation dose for Golden Delicious apple and Gala apple was both 40~80 Gy.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–341 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The suitable irradiation dose for Gala apple was 40~80 Gy.

Material
Gala applee0
Outcome
suitable irradiation dosee0
Value
40~80 Gye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The suitable irradiation dose for Golden Delicious apple and Gala apple was both 40~80 Gy.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–341 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation at 40~80 Gy shortened apple branches.

Treatment
irradiatione0
Outcome
branches of apple treese0
Direction
shortere0
Qualifier
this dose rangee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After irradiation within this dose range,the branches of apple trees became shorter,leaves became narrower,and the number of binary-cross branches and more-cross branches increased significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–536 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation at 40~80 Gy narrowed apple leaves.

Treatment
irradiatione0
Outcome
leavese0
Direction
narrowere0
Qualifier
this dose rangee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After irradiation within this dose range,the branches of apple trees became shorter,leaves became narrower,and the number of binary-cross branches and more-cross branches increased significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–536 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation at 40~80 Gy significantly increased binary-cross and more-cross branches.

Treatment
irradiatione0
Outcome
number of binary-cross branches and more-cross branchese0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
this dose rangee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After irradiation within this dose range,the branches of apple trees became shorter,leaves became narrower,and the number of binary-cross branches and more-cross branches increased significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–536 · show in text ↑

radiation · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.