Paper · 2007 · Canadian Journal of Botany

Do low-ethylene-producing transgenic canola (Brassica napus) plants expressing the ACC deaminase gene differ from wild-type plants in response to UVB radiation?

Mirwais M. Qaderi; M. Anisul Islam; David M. Reid; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Few studies have considered ethylene involvement in plant responses to ultraviolet-B (UVB) radiation. We studied the responses to UVB radiation of one wild-type (WT, ‘Westar’) canola (Brassica napus L.) with normal ethylene evolution and two transgenic (C1, C2) lines with lower ethylene evolution. Canola plants were grown under biologically effective levels of UVB (UVB BE ) radiation: 0.03 (low), 4.88 (medium), and 9.78 (high) kJ·m –2 ·d –1 in controlled-environment growth chambers. The growth and physiological parameters of the plants were measured. Of the two transgenic lines, C1 demonstrated higher ethylene evolution than C2 but lower than WT. The lowest aboveground and belowground biomass was found with exposure to high UVB radiation. WT produced more biomass than C2. Net CO 2 assimilation and transpiration did not vary among plant lines or UVB treatments. Water-use efficiency was lower under high UVB radiation than under low UVB. The quantum yield of photosystem II was higher for C2 than for either WT or C1. WT did not differ from transgenic plants in respect to photosynthetic pigments and UV-screening compounds. Photosynthetic pigment concentration decreased, but concentration of UV-screening compounds, thickness of epicuticular wax, and the rate of root hydraulic conductance were increased by exposure to UVB radiation. While there appears to be a lack of ethylene involvement in some of the measured physiological parameters, the transgenic plants exhibited differential sensitivity to UVB in a few key measured parameters.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C1 evolved more ethylene than C2 but less than WT.

Material
C1e0
Outcome
ethylene evolutione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
C2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“C1 demonstrated higher ethylene evolution than C2 but lower than WT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–653 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High UVB yielded the lowest aboveground and belowground biomass.

Treatment
high UVB radiatione0
Outcome
aboveground and belowground biomasse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest aboveground and belowground biomass was found with exposure to high UVB radiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–747 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WT produced more biomass than C2.

Material
WTe0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
C2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WT produced more biomass than C2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–781 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net CO2 assimilation and transpiration did not vary across lines or UVB treatments.

Treatment
UVB treatmentse0
Outcome
Net CO 2 assimilation and transpiratione0
Direction
did not varye0
Comparator
plant linese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Net CO 2 assimilation and transpiration did not vary among plant lines or UVB treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-use efficiency was lower under high than low UVB.

Treatment
high UVB radiatione0
Outcome
Water-use efficiencye0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
low UVBe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water-use efficiency was lower under high UVB radiation than under low UVB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–947 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C2 had higher photosystem II quantum yield than WT or C1.

Material
C2e0
Outcome
quantum yield of photosystem IIe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
WT or C1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The quantum yield of photosystem II was higher for C2 than for either WT or C1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1027 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WT and transgenic plants did not differ in pigments or UV-screening compounds.

Material
WTe0
Outcome
photosynthetic pigments and UV-screening compoundse0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
transgenic plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WT did not differ from transgenic plants in respect to photosynthetic pigments and UV-screening compounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1134 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UVB decreased photosynthetic pigment concentration.

Treatment
UVB radiatione0
Outcome
Photosynthetic pigment concentratione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Photosynthetic pigment concentration decreased, but concentration of UV-screening compounds, thickness of epicuticular wax, and the rate of root hydraulic conductance were increased by exposure to UVB radiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1346 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UVB increased UV-screening compounds, epicuticular wax thickness and root hydraulic conductance.

Treatment
UVB radiatione0
Outcome
concentration of UV-screening compounds, thickness of epicuticular wax, and the rate of root hydraulic conductancee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“concentration of UV-screening compounds, thickness of epicuticular wax, and the rate of root hydraulic conductance were increased by exposure to UVB radiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1346 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑

uv · physiology: water · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

radiation · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 2 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

uv · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

uv · physiology: photosynthesis · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

8 papers: 0 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.